Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 13–24 | Cite as

Adaptation or preadaptation: why are keelback snakes (Tropidonophis mairii) less vulnerable to invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus) than are other Australian snakes?

  • John Llewelyn
  • Ben L. Phillips
  • Greg P. Brown
  • Lin Schwarzkopf
  • Ross A. Alford
  • Richard Shine
Original paper


Biological invasions can expose native predators to novel prey which may be less nutritious or detrimental to predators. The introduction and subsequent spread of cane toads (Bufo marinus) through Australia has killed many anuran-eating snakes unable to survive the toad’s toxins. However, one native species, the keelback snake (Tropidonophis mairii), is relatively resistant to toad toxins and remains common in toad-infested areas. Is the keelback’s ability to coexist with toads a function of its ancestral Asian origins, or a consequence of rapid adaptation since cane toads arrived in Australia? And does the snake’s feeding preference for frogs rather than toads reflect an innate or learned behaviour? We compared keelback populations long sympatric with toads with a population that has encountered toads only recently. Unlike toad-vulnerable snake species, sympatry with toads has not affected keelback toxin tolerances or feeding responses: T. mairii from toad-sympatric and toad-naïve populations show a similar sensitivity to toad toxin, and a similar innate preference for frogs rather than toads. Feeding responses of neonatal keelbacks demonstrate that learning plays little or no role in the snake’s aversion to toads. Thus, behavioural aversion to B. marinus as prey, and physiological tolerance to toad toxins are pre-existing innate characteristics of Australian keelbacks rather than adaptations to the cane toad’s invasion of Australia. Such traits were most likely inherited from ancestral keelbacks that adapted to the presence of bufonids in Asia. Our results suggest that the impact of invasive species on native taxa may be strongly influenced by the biogeographic histories of the species involved.


Preadaptation Introduced species Chemical defense Cane toad Keelback 


  1. Bernays EA (1993) Aversion learning and feeding. In: Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect learning: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  2. Blumstein DT (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breeden K (1963) Cane toad (Bufo marinus). Wildl Aust 1:31Google Scholar
  4. Brodie ED, Brodie ED Jr (1990) Tetrodotoxin resistance in garter snakes: an evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey. Evolution 44:651–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodie ED, Brodie ED Jr (1999) Costs of exploiting poisonous prey: evolutionary trade-offs in a predator-prey arms race. Evolution 53:626–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodie ED Jr, Ridenhour BJ, Brodie ED (2002) The evolutionary response of predators to dangerous prey: hotspots and coldspots in the geographic mosaic of coevolution between garter snakes and newts. Evolution 56:2067–2082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll SP, Loye JE, Dingle H, Mathieson M, Famula TR, Zalucki MP (2005) And the beak shall inherit—evolution in response to invasion. Ecol Lett 8:944–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cogger HG (2000) Reptiles and amphibians of Australia, 6th edn. Reed New Holland, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Cogger H, Heatwole H (1981) The Australian reptiles: origins, biogeography, distribution patterns and island evolution. In: Keast A, Junk W (eds) Ecological biogeography of Australia. The Hague, Boston, pp 1332–1373Google Scholar
  10. Cooper CB, Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA (2007) Contrasting natural experiments confirm competition between house finches and house sparrows. Ecology 88:864–870CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife: threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickman CR (1992) Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology 73:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drummond H, Garcia MC (1995) Congenital responsiveness of garter snakes to a dangerous prey abolished by learning. Anim Behav 49:891–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on colour patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erspamer V, Erspamer GF, Mazzanti G, Endean R (1984) Active peptides in the skins of one hundred amphibian species from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Comp Biochem Physiol C 77:99–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritts TH, Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:113–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Futuyma DJ, Moreno G (1988) The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:207–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Georges A (2009) Wildlife worries spread. Canberra Times, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  19. Glenn S, Holway D (2008) Consumption of introduced prey by native predators: Argentine ants and pit-building ant lions. Biol Invasions 10:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greer AE (1997) The biology and evolution of Australian snakes. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping NortonGoogle Scholar
  21. King RB, Ray JM, Stanford KM (2006) Gorging on gobies: beneficial effects of alien prey on a threatened vertebrate. Can J Zool 84:108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kozubikova E, Filipova L, Kozak P, Duris Z, Martins M, Dieguez-Uribeondos J, Oidtmann B, Petrusek A (2009) Prevalence of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci in invasive American crayfishes in the Czech Republic. Conserv Biol 23:1204–1213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Krueger CC, May B (1991) Ecological and genetic effects of salmonid introductions in North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:66–77Google Scholar
  24. Launchbaugh KL, Provenza FD (1994) The effect of flavor concentration and toxin dose on the formation and generalization of flavor aversions in lambs. J Anim Sci 72:10–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Llewelyn J, Phillips BL, Shine R (2009a) Sublethal costs associated with the consumption of toxic prey by snakes. Aust Ecol 34:179–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Llewelyn J, Schwarzkopf L, Alford R, Shine R (2009b) Something different for dinner? Responses of a native Australian predator (the keelback snake) to an invasive prey species (the cane toad). Biol Invasions, published online July 14th 2009Google Scholar
  27. Llewelyn J, Webb JK, Schwarzkopf L, Alford R, Shine R (in press) Behavioural responses of carnivorous marsupials (Planigale maculata) to toxic invasive cane toads (Bufo marinus). Aust Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.02067.x
  28. Maerz JC, Karuzas JM, Madison DM, Blossey B (2005) Introduced invertebrates are important prey for a generalist predator. Divers Distrib 11:83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malnate EV, Underwood G (1988) Australasian snakes of the genus Tropidonophis. Proc Acad Natl Sci Phila 140:59–201Google Scholar
  30. Meyer K, Linde H (1971) Collection of toad venoms and chemistry of toad venom steroids. In: Bucherl W, Buckley EE (eds) Venomous animals and their venoms. Academic Press, New York, pp 521–556Google Scholar
  31. Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5446–5451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillips BL, Shine R (2004) Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:17150–17155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Phillips BL, Shine R (2006) An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: cane toads and black snakes in Australia. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:1545–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Shine R (2003) Assessing the potential impact of cane toads on Australian snakes. Conserv Biol 17:1738–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Phillips BL, Brown GP, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads. Nature 439:803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips BL, Greenlees MJ, Brown GP, Shine R (2009) Predator behaviour and morphology mediates the impact of an invasive species: cane toads and death adders in Australia. Anim Conserv, published online July 29th 2009Google Scholar
  37. Pockley D (1965) The free and the caged. Blackwoods Mag 1965:439–466Google Scholar
  38. Rayward A (1974) Giant toads: a threat to Australian wildlife. Wildlife 17:506–507Google Scholar
  39. Schoonhoven LM, Meerman J (1978) Metabolic cost of changes in diet and neutralization of allelochemics. Entomol Exp Appl 24:489–493Google Scholar
  40. Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Shine R (1989) Constraints, allometry, and adaptation: food habits and reproductive biology of Australian brownsnakes (Preudonaja: Elapidae). Herpetologica 45:195–207Google Scholar
  42. Shine R (1991) Strangers in a strange land: ecology of the Australian colubrid snakes. Copeia 1991:120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shine R, Brown GP (2008) Adapting to the unpredictable: reproductive biology of vertebrates in the Australian wet-dry tropics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:363–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Short J, Kinnear JE, Robley A (2002) Surplus killing by introduced predators in Australia-evidence for ineffective anti-predator adaptations in native prey species? Biol Conserv 103:283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Skelhorn J, Rowe C (2006) Predator avoidance learning of prey with secreted or stored defences and the evolution of insect defences. Anim Behav 72:827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Straughan IR (1969) The Hyla bicolor complex (Anura, Hylidae) in north Queensland. Proc R Soc Queensland 80:43–54Google Scholar
  47. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett 9:357–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tyler MJ (1987) Frog and cane toad skin secretions. In: Covacevich J, Davie P, Pearn J (eds) Toxic plants and animals: a guide for Australia. Queensland Museum, Brisbane, pp 329–339Google Scholar
  49. Tyler MJ, Davies M (1978) Species-groups within the Australopapuan hylid frog genus Litoria Tschudi. Aust J Zool 26:619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Urban MC, Phillips BL, Skelly DK, Shine R (2007) The cane toad’s (Chaunus [Bufo] marinus) increasing ability to invade Australia is revealed by a dynamically updated range model. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Webb JK, Brown GP, Child T, Greenlees MJ, Phillips BL, Shine R (2008) A native dasyurid predator (common planigale, Planigale maculata) rapidly learns to avoid a toxic invader. Aust Ecol 33:821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussmann GF, Hairston JNG (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424:303–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Llewelyn
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ben L. Phillips
    • 1
  • Greg P. Brown
    • 1
  • Lin Schwarzkopf
    • 2
  • Ross A. Alford
    • 2
  • Richard Shine
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Marine and Tropical BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia
  3. 3.TownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations