Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 373–388

Plastic bet-hedging in an amphicarpic annual: an integrated strategy under variable conditions

  • Asaf Sadeh
  • Hagai Guterman
  • Mordechai Gersani
  • Ofer Ovadia
Original Paper


Amphicarpy is a form of diversified bet-hedging expressed mostly in annual plants, where two types of offspring are produced with two distinct ecological roles: long-range aerial dispersers and highly competitive subterranean, sedentary fruit. Emex spinosa is a semi-arid, amphicarpic annual, inhabiting habitats with different levels of environmental variation. We tested the hypothesis that, in E. spinosa, bet-hedging may be “fine-tuned” by plasticity in the phenotype ratio (aerial/subterranean fruit mass) as a function of environmental conditions. We conducted a greenhouse experiment, manipulating nutrient availability and intraspecific density, to determine the pattern of ratio shifts. In order to determine whether the integrated strategy is an adaptation to variable habitats, a similar common garden experiment was conducted, comparing two natural populations differing in environmental variability. The offspring ratio shifted in response to both nutrient availability and plant density. In pots containing single plants the ratio increased steeply with nutrient availability, while in pots containing eight plants a more moderate increase occurred. These shifts were the result of plasticity in allocation to both achene types, as well as ontogenetic effects on aerial achene production. The degree of response increased with the heterogeneity of the habitat of origin. We found evidence for an adaptive integrated strategy, with bet-hedging “fine-tuned” by phenotypic plasticity. Strenuous conditions tended to shift the offspring ratio towards securing subterranean reproductive success, while favorable conditions resulted in a shift towards dispersible achenes.


Bet-hedging Seed dispersal Emex spinosa Integrated strategies Life history Phenotypic plasticity Sibling competition Variable environments 


  1. Alpert P, Simms E (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA (1997) Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions. In: Bazzaz FA, Grace J (eds) Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, NewYork, pp 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell G, Lechowicz MJ, Appenzeller A, Chandler M, DeBlois E, Jackson L, Mackenzie B, Preziosi R, Schallenberg M, Tinker N (1993) The spatial structure of the physical environment. Oecologia 96:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaustein L, Schwartz SS (2001) Why study ecology in temporary pools? Isr J Zool 47:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulmer MG (1984) Delayed germination of seeds: Cohen’s model revisited. Theor Popul Biol 26:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheplick GP (1987) The ecology of amphicarpic plants. Trends Ecol Evol 2:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheplick GP (1994) Life history evolution in amphicarpic plants. Plant Species Biol 9:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheplick GP, Quinn JA (1983) The shift in aerial/subterranean fruit ratio in Amphicarpum purshii: causes and significance. Oecologia 57:374–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheplick GP, Kane KH (2004) Genetic relatedness and competition in Triplasis purpurea (Poaceae): resource partitioning or kin selection? Int J Plant Sci 164:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen D (1966) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J Theor Biol 12:119–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen D (1967) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcome. J Theor Biol 16:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen D (1971) Maximizing final yield when growth is limited by time or by limiting resources. J Theor Biol 33:299–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeWitt TJ, Langerhans RB (2004) Integrated solutions to environmental heterogeneity. In: DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (eds) Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 98–111Google Scholar
  14. Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. University of California Press, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. Evenari M, Kadouri A, Gutterman Y (1977) Eco-physiological investigations on the Amphicarpy of Emex Spinosa (L.) Campd. Flora 166:223–238Google Scholar
  16. Evenari M, Shanan L, Tadmor N (1982) The Negev: the challenge of a desert. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Gersani M, Brown JS, O’brien EE, Maina GM, Abramski Z (2001) Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. J Ecol 89:660–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillespie JH (1977) Natural selection for variance in offspring numbers: a new evolutionary principal. Am Nat 111:1010–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gillespie JH (1981) The role of migration in the genetic-structure of populations in temporally and spatially varying environments .3. Migration modification. Am Nat 117:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hairston NG (1989) Ecological experiments: purpose, design, and execution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. University of California Agricultural Experimental Station, Berkley, Circ. 347Google Scholar
  23. Lytle DA, Poff NL (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 19:94–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandák B, Pyšek P (1999) How does density and nutrient stress affect allometry and fruit production in a heterocarpic species Atriplex sagittata (Chenopodiaceae)? Can J Bot 77:1106–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mangel M, Clark CW (1988) Dynamic modeling in behavioral ecology. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. McConnaughay KDM, Coleman SJ (1999) Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy GI (1968) Patterns in life history and the environment. Am Nat 102:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nager RG, Van-Noordwijk AJ (1995) Proximate and ultimate aspects of phenotypic plasticity in timing of great tit breeding in a heterogeneous environment. Am Nat 146:454–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peters DPC, Havstad KM (2006) Nonlinear dynamics in arid and semi-arid systems: interactions among drivers and processes across scales. J Arid Environ 65:196–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Philippi TE (1993) Bet-hedging germination of desert annuals—beyond the 1st year. Am Nat 142:474–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Philippi TE, Seger J (1989) Hedging one’s evolutionary bets, revisited. Trends Ecol Evol 4:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Philippi TE, Simovich MA, Bauder ET, Moorad JA (2001) Habitat ephemerality and hatching fractions of a diapausing anostracan (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Isr J Zool 47:387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice SA, Bazzaz FA (1989) Quantification of plasticity of plant traits in response to light intensity: comparing phenotypes at a common weight. Oecologia 78:502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roff DA (2002) Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Rood SB, Patino S, Coombs K, Tyree MT (2000) Branch sacrifice: cavitation-associated drought adaptation of riparian cottonwoods. Trees Struct Funct 14:248–257Google Scholar
  37. Satake A, Sasaki A, Iwasa Y (2001) Variable timing of reproduction in unpredictable environments: adaptation of flood plain plants. Theor Popul Biol 60:1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seger J, Brockmann HJ (1987) What is bet-hedging? Oxf Surv Evol Biol 4:182–211Google Scholar
  39. Shachak M, Sachs M, Moshe I (1998) Ecosystem management of desertified shrublands in Israel. Ecosystems 1:475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snyder KA, Tartowski SL (2006) Multi-scale temporal variation in water availability: implications for vegetation dynamics in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. J Arid Environ 65:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sultan SE (1995) Phenotypic plasticity and plant adaptation. Acta Bot Neerl 44(4):363–383Google Scholar
  42. Venable DL (1985) The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism. Am Nat 126:577–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venable DL, Brown JS (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. Am Nat 131:360–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Venable DL, Lawlor L (1980) Delayed germination and dispersal in desert annuals: escape in space and time. Oecologia 46:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Venable DL, Dyreson E, Morales E (1995) Population dynamics consequences and evolution of seed traits of Heterosperma pinnatum (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 82:410–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Venable DL (2007) Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals. Ecology 88:1086–1090PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002) Differentiation in populations of Hordeum spontaneum Koch along a gradient of environmental productivity and predictability: plasticity in response to water and nutrient stress. Biol J Linn Soc 75:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weigelt A, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W (2005) Competition among three dune species: the impact of water availability on below-ground processes. Plant Ecol 176:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss PW (1980) Germination, reproduction and interference in the amphicarpic annual E. spinosa (L.) Campd. Oecologia 45:244–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zeide B (1978) Reproductive behavior of plants in time. Am Nat 112:636–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zohary M (1962) Plant life of Palestine. Ronald Press Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asaf Sadeh
    • 1
  • Hagai Guterman
    • 1
  • Mordechai Gersani
    • 1
  • Ofer Ovadia
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesBen-Gurion University in the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations