Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation?
- First Online:
Mary Jane West-Eberhard has suggested that plasticity may be of primary importance in promoting evolutionary innovation and diversification. Here, we explore the possibility that the diversification of phytophagous insects may have occurred through such a process, using examples from nymphalid butterflies. We discuss the ways in which host plant range is connected to plasticity and present our interpretation of how West-Eberhard’s scenario may result in speciation driven by plasticity in host utilization. We then review some of the evidence that diversity of plant utilization has driven the diversification of phytophagous insects and finally discuss whether this suggests a role for plasticity-driven speciation. We find a close conceptual connection between our theory that the diversification of phytophagous insects has been driven by oscillations in host range, and our personal interpretation of the most efficient way in which West-Eberhard’s theory could account for plasticity-driven speciation. A major unresolved issue is the extent to which a wide host plant range is due to adaptive plasticity with dedicated modules of genetic machinery for utilizing different plants.
KeywordsButterflies Insects Polygonia Host plants Development Phenotypic accommodation Genetic accommodation Niche Resource use
- Janz N, Nylin S (2007) Host plant range and speciation: the oscillation hypothesis. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation, and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. University of California Press (in press)Google Scholar
- Nylin S, Wahlberg N (in press) Does plasticity drive speciation? Host plant shifts and diversification in nymphaline butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) during the tertiary. Biol J Linn SocGoogle Scholar
- Nylin S, Gotthard K, Nygren GH (2005) Seasonal plasticity, host plants, and the origin of butterfly biodiversity. In: Fellowes MDE, Holloway GJ, Rolff J (eds) Insect evolutionary ecology. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 111–137Google Scholar
- Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M (1998) Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
- Shapiro AM (1976) Seasonal polyphenism. Evol Biol 9:259–333Google Scholar
- Shapiro AM (1984) The genetics of seasonal polyphenism and the evolution of “general purpose genotypes” in butterflies. In: Wöhrmann K, Loeschcke V (eds) Population biology and evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 16–30Google Scholar
- Thompson JN (1994) The coevolutionary process. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar