Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 357–366 | Cite as

Evidence for social role in a dolphin social network

  • David LusseauEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Social animals have to take into consideration the behaviour of conspecifics when making decisions to go by their daily lives. These decisions affect their fitness and there is therefore an evolutionary pressure to try making the right choices. In many instances individuals will make their own choices and the behaviour of the group will be a democratic integration of everyone’s decision. However, in some instances it can be advantageous to follow the choice of a few individuals in the group if they have more information regarding the situation that has arisen. Here I provide early evidence that decisions about shifts in activity states in a population of bottlenose dolphin follow such a decision-making process. This unshared consensus is mediated by a non-vocal signal, which can be communicated globally within the dolphin school. These signals are emitted by individuals that tend to have more information about the behaviour of potential competitors because of their position in the social network. I hypothesise that this decision-making process emerged from the social structure of the population and the need to maintain mixed-sex schools.

Keywords

Bottlenose dolphin Unshared consensus Social network Tursiops Behaviour Sociality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am currently supported by a Killam Postdoctoral Fellowship provided by the Killam trusts. I would like to thank Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho and Hal Whitehead for numerous fruitful discussions. Comments from two anonymous reviewers and Sara Helms Cahan improved this manuscript. Data collection and compilation was funded by the New Zealand Whale and Dolphin Trust, the New Zealand Department of Conservation, Real Journeys Ltd, and the University of Otago (Departments of Zoology and Marine Sciences and Bridging Grant scheme). I would also like to thank Susan M. Lusseau, Oliver J. Boisseau, Liz Slooten, and Steve Dawson for their numerous contributions to this research.

References

  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold K, Whiten A (2003) Grooming interactions among the chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest, Uganda: tests of five explanatory models. Behaviour 140:519–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baird RW, Dill LM (1996) Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales. Behav Ecol 7:408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black JM (1988) Preflight signaling in swans—a mechanism for group cohesion and flock formation. Ethology 79:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne RW (2000) How monkeys find their way: leadership, coordination and cognitive maps of African baboons. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 491–518Google Scholar
  7. Connor RC, Heithaus MR, Barre LM (1999) Superalliance of bottlenose dolphins. Nature 397:571–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connor RC, Heithaus MR, Barre LM (2001) Complex social structure, alliance stability and mating access in a bottlenose dolphin ‘super-alliance’. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2000) Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:2213–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2003) Group decision-making in animals. Nature 421:155–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conradt L, Roper TJ (2005) Consensus decision making in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 20:449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corner LAL, Pfeiffer DU, Morris RS (2003) Social network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev Vet Med 59:147–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couzin ID, Krause J (2003) Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 32:1–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433:513–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Croft DP, James R, Ward AJW, Botham MS, Mawdsley D, Krause J (2005) Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia 143:211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Waal FBM (2000) Primates—A natural heritage of conflict resolution. Science 289:586–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finneran JJ, Oliver CW, Schaefer KM, Ridgway SH (2000) Source levels and estimated yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) detection ranges for dolphin jaw pops, breaches, and tail slaps. J Acoust Soc Am 107:649–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flack JC, de Waal FBM (2000) ‘Any animal whatever’—Darwinian building blocks of morality in monkeys and apes. J Consciousness Stud 7:1–29Google Scholar
  19. Flack JC, Girvan M, de Waal FBM, Krakauer DC (2006) Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439:426–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry 40:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1:215–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritz H, de Garine Wichatitsky M (1996) Foraging in a social antelope: effects of group size on foraging choices and resource perception in impala. J Anim Ecol 65:736–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerard JF, Loisel P (1995) Spontaneous emergence of a relationship between habitat openness and mean group-size and its possible evolutionary consequences in large herbivores. J Theor Biol 176:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:7821–7826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffin AS, West SA (2002) Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol Evol 17:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hinde RA (1976) Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man 11:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janik VM (2000) Source levels and the estimated active space of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) whistles in the Moray Firth, Scotland. J Comp Physiol A 186:673–680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jennions MD, Macdonald DW (1994) Cooperative breeding in mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 9:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kappeler PM, van Schaik CP (2002) Evolution of primate social systems. Int J Primatol 23:707–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koenig A (2002) Competition for resources and its behavioral consequences among female primates. Int J Primatol 23:759–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krause J., Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Lusseau D (2003a) The effects of tourism activities on bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in Fiordland, New Zealand pp 245. Zoology. University of Otago, DunedinGoogle Scholar
  33. Lusseau D (2003b) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S186–S188Google Scholar
  34. Lusseau D (2003c) Male and female bottlenose dolphins Tursiops sp. have different strategies to avoid interactions with tour boats in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 257:267–274Google Scholar
  35. Lusseau D (2006a) The short-term behavioral reactions of bottlenose dolphins to interactions with boats in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Mar Mamm Sci. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00052.xGoogle Scholar
  36. Lusseau D (2006b) Why do dolphins jump? Interpreting the behavioural repertoire of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Behav Proc. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.06.006Google Scholar
  37. Lusseau D, Newman MEJ (2004) Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S477–S481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lusseau D, Schneider K, Boisseau OJ, Haase P, Slooten E, Dawson SM (2003) The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations—Can geographic isolation explain this unique trait? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:396–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lusseau D, Williams RJ, Wilson B, Grellier K, Barton TR, Hammond PS, Thompson PM (2004) Parallel influence of climate on the behaviour of Pacific killer whales and Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Ecol Lett 7:1068–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lusseau D, Wilson B, Hammond PS, Grellier K, Durban JW, Parsons KM, Barton TR, Thompson PM (2006) Quantifying the influence of sociality on population structure in bottlenose dolphins. J Anim Ecol 75:14–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lusseau SM, Wing SR (2006) Importance of local production versus pelagic subsidies in the diet of an isolated population of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops sp. Mar Ecol Progr Ser in pressGoogle Scholar
  42. Mann J (2000) Unraveling the dynamics of social life: long-term studies and observational methods. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies. University of Chicago Press, London, pp 45–64Google Scholar
  43. Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (2000) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. McGraw JB, Caswell H (1996) Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data. Am Nat 147:47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poole JH, Payne K, Langbauer WR, Moss CJ (1988) The social contexts of some very low-frequency calls of African elephants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schneider K (1999) Behaviour and ecology of bottlenose dolphins in Doubtful Sound, Fiordland, New Zealand. Marine Sciences. University of Otago, Dunedin, 200 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Stewart KJ, Harcourt AH (1994) Gorillas vocalizations during rest periods - signals of impending departure. Behaviour 130:29–40Google Scholar
  49. Templeton JJ, Giraldeau LA (1996) Vicarious sampling: The use of personal and public information by starlings foraging in a simple patchy environment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tolley KA, Read AJ, Wells RS, Urian KW, Scott MD, Irvine AB, Hohn AA (1995) Sexual dimorphism in wild bottle-nosed dolphins (TursiopsTruncatus) from Sarasota, Florida. J Mammal 76:1190–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Watts DP (1998) Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:43–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watts DP (2002) Reciprocity and interchange in the social relationships of wild male chimpanzees. Behaviour 139:343–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Webb CR (2005) Farm animal networks: unraveling the contact structure of the British sheep population. Prev Vet Med 68:3–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wells RS, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1987) The social structure of free ranging bottlenose dolphins. In Genowyas H (ed) Current mammalogy. Plenum Press, New York, pp 247–305Google Scholar
  56. West SA, Murray MG, Machado CA, Griffin AS, Herre EA (2001) Testing Hamilton’s rule with competition between relatives. Nature 409:510–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams JA, Dawson SM, Slooten E (1993a) The abundance and distribution of bottle-nosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Can J Zool 71:2080–2088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams TM, Friedl WA, Haun JE (1993b) The physiology of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): heart rate, metabolic rate and plasma lactate concentration during exercise. J Exp Biol 179:31–46Google Scholar
  59. Würsig B, Würsig M (1977) The photographic determination of group size, composition, and stability of coastal porpoises (Tursiops truncatus). Science 198:755–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations