Advertisement

Euphytica

, 215:49 | Cite as

Eighteen cycles of recurrent mass selection for early flowering in two maize synthetics

  • Bernardo Ordás
  • Pedro Revilla
  • M. Cinta Romay
  • Rosa A. Malvar
  • Ana Butrón
  • Amando OrdásEmail author
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

The genetic basis of commercial maize (Zea mays L.) is quite narrow. The incorporation of exotic germplasm, i.e. all germplasm that does not have immediate usefulness without selection for adaptation, is a way of enhancing the genetic basis of the material that a breeder can use. The populations of maize ‘Purdue Synthetic A o2’ (Purdue A) and ‘Purdue Synthetic B o2’ (Purdue B) were subjected to 18 cycles of recurrent mas selection for early flowering in Northwestern Spain. To evaluate the efficiency of selection, the original populations, the cycles of selection 6, 12, and 18, and five hybrid checks were evaluated in four environments in Spain. Both populations responded positively to selection for earlier female flowering with linear regression being highly significant. The change in the number of days from planting to silking was similar in both populations (1.01 days to silking/cycle of selection). Plant height, kernel moisture at harvest, and yield decreased significantly in both populations. Selection for early silking was efficient and resulted on similar decreases of kernel moisture in both populations, but yield and biomass decreased strongly. Therefore, although we must pay careful attention to agronomical important traits, these early o2 populations can be incorporated to a breeding program under short season conditions.

Keywords

Adaptation Early flowering Maize Mass selection Zea mays L. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Plan for Research and Development (project codes AGL2007-64218/AGR, AGL2010-22254-C02-01, AGL2013-48852-C3-1-R, and AGL2016-77628-R), and FEDER funds. Bernardo Ordás wishes to acknowledge his grant from the “Ramón y Cajal” program of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

References

  1. Bernardo R (2014) Essentials of plant breeding. Stemma Press, WoodburyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowley SR (2015) A hitchhiker’s guide to statistics in biology: generalized linear mixed, model edn. Plants et al., KincardineGoogle Scholar
  3. Fontúrbel MT, Ordás A (1981) Selección masal por precocidad en dos poblaciones de maíz. Genét Ibér 33:225–235 (In Spanish with an English abstract.) Google Scholar
  4. Gbur EE, Stroup WW, McCarter KS, Durham S, Young LJ, Christman M, West M, Kramer M (2012) Analysis of generalized linear mixed models in the agricultural and natural resources sciences. ASA-SSSA-CSSA, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  5. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ (2014) Adaptation of tropical maize germplasm to temperate environments. Euphytica 196:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallauer AR, Miranda Fo JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  7. Hallauer AR, Sears JH (1972) Integrating exotic germplasm into Corn Belt maize breeding programs. Crop Sci 12:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawton JW, Wilson CM (2003) Proteins of the kernel. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists Inc., St. Paul, pp 313–354Google Scholar
  9. Lee EA, Tracy WF (2009) Modern maize breeding. Maize handbook—volume II: genetics and genomics. Springer, New York, pp 141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mertz ET, Bates LS, Nelson OE (1964) Mutant gene that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm. Science 145:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moose SP, Dudley JW, Rocheford TR (2004) Maize selection passes the century mark: a unique resource for twenty-first century genomics. Trends Plant Sci 9:358–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ordás A (1988) Mass selection for earliness in two populations of maize. An Aula Dei 19:207–211Google Scholar
  13. Ordás A, Santiago I, Malvar RA, Vales MI (1996) Six cycles for selection for adaptation in two exotic populations of maize. Euphytica 92:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pinter L, Burucs Z, Alfoldi Z (1995) Comparison of normal and opaque-2 maize genotypes used for corn cob mix in pig-feeding. Agron J 87:547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Samayoa LF, Butrón A, Revilla P, Alvarez A, Malvar RA (2012) Five cycles of mass selection for earliness and ear appearance under corn borer infestation in the maize synthetic BS17. Crop Sci 52:2432–2437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. SAS Institute (2012) SAS STAT 14.1 help and documentation. SAS Inst., CaryGoogle Scholar
  17. Stroup WW (2013) Generalized linear mixed models: modern concepts, methods and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC)PontevedraSpain
  2. 2.Institute for Genomic DiversityCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations