, 215:23 | Cite as

Frequent introgression of European cauliflowers in the present day cultivated Indian cauliflowers and role of Indian genotypes in the evolution of tropical cauliflower

  • S. S. DeyEmail author
  • R. Bhatia
  • Kanika Sharma
  • Ila Bhardwaj
  • Chithra Devi Pandey
  • Chander Parkash
  • Raj Kumar


Adaptation to higher temperature and humidity are typical characteristics of Indian cauliflower. The typical Indian cauliflowers have been used worldwide in developing cultivars with tolerance to higher temperature. Present day cultivated types of Indian cauliflowers posses other desirable traits like white and compact curd with semi-erect plant types like the European snowball types. However, there is no molecular-genetic study to define the role of present day European types in the evolution of Indian cauliflowers. We have studied forty five genotypes of cauliflowers including present day cultivars from different maturity groups of Indian cauliflowers and snowball types cultivated in India. To understand the relationship among the different cauliflowers we studied the pattern of diversity using 115 SSRs uniformly distributed throughout the Brassica oleracea genomes along with fourteen important agronomic traits of cauliflowers. It was found that the first two groups of Indian cauliflowers (Group-I and II) were completely different from the snowball types cultivated in India. They are probably originated from the Cornish types. However, the widely cultivated genotypes have undergone several cycles of selection to acquire the desirable plant types. All genotypes of snowball types were clustered together along with genotypes from European origin. The last group of Indian cauliflowers share similarity with snowball types and other European genotypes both in molecular and agronomic level. The genotypes from Taiwan and China were more similar to the Indian cauliflower genotypes which establishes the role of Indian cauliflowers in evolution of different tropical cauliflowers cultivated in different countries. Population structure analysis revealed most likely value of K = 4. Our study establishes the frequent introgression of snowball types in the evolution of Indian cauliflowers with requirement of comparatively lower temperature. The role of the Indian cauliflowers with high temperature tolerance in the evolution of present day tropical cauliflowers is also established.


Indian cauliflower Evolution SSR analysis Morphological traits Snowball types Cornish types 


Supplementary material

10681_2019_2346_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)
10681_2019_2346_MOESM2_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 26 kb)
10681_2019_2346_MOESM3_ESM.txt (12 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (TXT 11 kb)
10681_2019_2346_MOESM4_ESM.docx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 11 kb)


  1. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Camargo LEA, Williams PH, Osborn TC (1995) Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling resistance of Brassica oleracea to Xanthomonas campestris pv campestris in the field and glasshouse. Phytopathology 85:1296–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crisp P (1982) The use of an evolutionary scheme for cauliflowers in the screening of genetic resources. Euphytica 31:725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doebley J (1992) Mapping the genes that made maize. Trends Genet 8:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doebley J (1993) Genetics, development and plant evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 3:865–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doebley J, Lukens L (1998) Transcriptional regulation and the evolution of plant form. Plant Cell 10:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantity of fresh leaf material. Phytochem Bull 119:11–15Google Scholar
  9. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldner H (1956) New varieties of cauliflower developed locally. Bull Indep Biol Labbr Keffrr Mala Isr 12:13–14Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert JC (1953) Improved hot weather cauliflower types. Circ Hawaii Agric Exp Stn 49:7Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert JC (1955) Pua Kea cauliflower for low elevations. Hawaii Fm Sci 4:5–8Google Scholar
  13. Izzah NK, Lee J, Jayakodi M, Perumal S, Jin M, Park BS, Ahn K, Yang TJ (2014) Transcriptome sequencing of two parental lines of cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and construction of an EST-based genetic map. BMC Genom 15:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalloo G, Bergh BO (1993) Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Li H, Chen X, Yang Y, Xu J, Gu J, Fu J, Qian X, Zhang S, Wu J, Liu K (2011) Development and genetic mapping of microsatellite markers from whole genome shotgun sequences in Brassica oleracea. Mol Breed 28:585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mortensen E, Bullard ET (1968) Handbook of tropical and subtropical horticulture. Dept of State Agency for International Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Nei M, Takezaki N (1983) Estimation of genetic distances and phylogenetic trees from DNA analysis. In: Proceedings of 5th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, vol 21, pp 405–412Google Scholar
  18. Nieuwhof M (1963) Pollination and contamination of Brassica oleracea L. Euphytica 12:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paul WRC (1933) A note on the cultivation of cauliflower in the low country districts of Ceylon. Trop Agric 81:91–94Google Scholar
  20. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006) DARwin software.
  21. Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F (2003) Methods for data analysis. In: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glazmann JC (eds) Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants. Science Publishers, Inc and Cirad, Montpellier, pp 31–63Google Scholar
  22. Rodrigo PA, Urbanes PG, Hernais PS (1935) A progress reports on the acclimatization of cauliflower. Philipp J Agric 6:115–127Google Scholar
  23. Schwanitz F (1967) Die Evolution der Kulturpflanzen. Bayerischer Landwirtschaftverlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  24. Seshadhri VS, Chatterjee SS (1996) The history and adaptation of some introduced vegetable crops in India. Veg Sci 23:114–140Google Scholar
  25. Sharma SR, Singh PK, Chable V, Tripathy SK (2004) A review in hybrid cauliflower development. In: Singh PK, Dasgupta SK, Tripathi SK (eds) Hybrid vegetable development. The Haworth Press, New York, pp 217–221Google Scholar
  26. Singh BK (2015) Advances in genetic improvement of cauliflower. In: Pandey S, Singh B, Mishra GP, Karkute SG (eds) Novel genomic tools and modern genetics and breeding approaches for vegetable crops improvement. TM No. 66, ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi, pp 101–115Google Scholar
  27. Singh BK, Devi J (2015) Improved production technology for cole crops (Brassica oleracea). In: Singh N, Roy S, Karmakar P, Chaurasia SNS, Gupta S, Singh B (eds) Improved production technologies in vegetable crops. TM No. 59, ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi, pp 102–119Google Scholar
  28. Singh BK, Singh B (2016) Development of hybrids and hybrid seed production of cole crops. In: Singh B, Pandey S, Singh N, Manimurugan C, Devi J, Singh PM (eds) Principles and production techniques of hybrid seeds in vegetables. TM No. 67, ICAR-IIVR, Varanasi, pp 112–125Google Scholar
  29. Singh B, Singh A, Pal AK, Banerjee MK (2002) Evaluation of self-incompatibility in Indian cauliflower. Veg Sci 29:142–145Google Scholar
  30. Singh BK, Singh B, Singh PM (2018) Breeding cauliflowers: a review. Int J Veg Sci 24:58–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Song K, Osborn TC, Williams PH (1988) Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). Theor Appl Genet 79:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swarup V, Chatterjee SS (1972) Origin and improvement of Indian cauliflower. Econ Bot 26:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsunoda S, Hirata K, Gomez-Campo C (1980) Brassica crops and wild allies. Japan Scientific Societies Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  34. Verma BK, Kalia P, Prassanna BM (2017) Genetic characterization of self-incompatible lines and strategies for heterosis breeding in cauliflower. Int J Veg Sci 23:411–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang W, Huang S, Liu Y, Fang Z, Yang L, Hua W, Yuan S, Liu S, Sun J, Zhuang M, Zhang Y, Zeng A (2012) Construction and analysis of a high-density genetic linkage map in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). BMC Genom 13:523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Sinaur, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  37. Wood R, Jones HM (1936) Cauliflower cultivation in the tropics. Trop Agric 13:218–220Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. S. Dey
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Bhatia
    • 1
  • Kanika Sharma
    • 1
  • Ila Bhardwaj
    • 1
  • Chithra Devi Pandey
    • 2
  • Chander Parkash
    • 1
  • Raj Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research InstituteKulluIndia
  2. 2.Division of Germplasm ConservationICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic ResourcesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations