Advertisement

Euphytica

, 214:216 | Cite as

Assessment of different anther culture approaches to produce doubled haploids in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

  • Abouzar Asadi
  • Alireza Zebarjadi
  • Mohammad Reza Abdollahi
  • Jose M. Seguí-Simarro
Article
  • 175 Downloads

Abstract

Cucumber is one of the most important vegetable crops worldwide, which makes it a good candidate to produce doubled haploid (DH) lines to accelerate plant breeding. Traditionally, these approaches involved induction of gynogenesis or parthenogenesis with irradiated pollen, which carries some disadvantages compared to androgenesis. Despite this, studies on anther/microspore cultures in cucumber are surprisingly scarce. Furthermore, most of them failed to unambiguously demonstrate the haploid origin of the individuals obtained. In this work we focused on anther cultures using two cucumber genotypes, different previously published protocols for anther culture, different in vitro culture variants to make it more efficient, and most importantly, a combination of flow cytometry and microsatellite molecular markers to evaluate the real androgenic potential and the impact of anther wall tissue proliferation. We developed a method to produce DH plants involving a bud pretreatment at 4 °C, a 35 °C treatment to anthers, culture with BAP and 2,4-D, and induction of callus morphogenesis by an additional 35 °C treatment and sequential culture first in liquid medium in darkness and second in solid medium with light. We also found that factors such as genotype, proliferation of anther wall tissues, orientation of anthers in the culture medium and growth regulator composition of the initial anther culture medium have a remarkable impact. Our rate of chromosome doubling (81%) was high enough to exclude additional chromosome doubling steps. Together, our results present androgenesis as an improvable but yet more convenient alternative to traditional gynogenesis and parthenogenesis-based approaches.

Keywords

Androgenesis Callogenesis Chromosome doubling Cucurbits Embryogenesis Organogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to all the whole staff of the Cell Biology Group for helping and training AA during his stay in the group. This work was supported by Grant AGL2017-88135-R to JMSS from Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) jointly funded by FEDER.

Authors contribution

AA performed all the experimental work and analyzed the results. AZ, MRA and JMSS designed the experimental work and analyzed the results. JMSS wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdollahi MR, Najafi S, Sarikhani H, Moosavi SS (2016) Induction and development of anther-derived gametic embryos in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) by optimizing the macronutrient and agar concentrations in culture medium. Turk J Biol 40(3):571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashok Kumar HG, Murthy HN (2004) Effect of sugars and amino acids on androgenesis of Cucumis sativus. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 78(3):201–208.  https://doi.org/10.1023/b:ticu.0000025637.56693.68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai B, Su YH, Yuan J, Zhang XS (2013) Induction of somatic embryos in arabidopsis requires local YUCCA expression mediated by the down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis. Mol Plant 6(4):1247–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/sss154 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Claveria E, Garcia-Mas J, Dolcet-Sanjuan R (2005) Optimization of cucumber doubled haploid line production using in vitro rescue of in vivo induced parthenogenic embryos. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130(4):555–560Google Scholar
  5. Corral-Martínez P, Nuez F, Seguí-Simarro JM (2011) Genetic, quantitative and microscopic evidence for fusion of haploid nuclei and growth of somatic calli in cultured ms10 35 tomato anthers. Euphytica 178(2):215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0303-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danin-Poleg Y, Reis N, Tzuri G, Katzir N (2001) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Cucumis. Theor Appl Genet 102(1):61–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong Y-Q, Zhao W-X, Li X-H, Liu X-C, Gao N-N, Huang J-H, Wang W-Y, Xu X-L, Tang Z-H (2016) Androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis haploids in cucurbit species. Plant Cell Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2018-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. FAOSTAT (2018) http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed July 2018
  9. Ficcadenti N, Sestili S, Annibali S, Di Marco M, Schiavi M (1999) In vitro gynogenesis to induce haploid plants in melon Cucumis melo L. Genet Breed 53:255–257Google Scholar
  10. Gałązka J, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (2013) Review of research on haploid production in cucumber and other cucurbits. Folia Hortic.  https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2013-0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamidvand Y, Abdollahi MR, Chaichi M, Moosavi SS (2013) The effect of plant growth regulators on callogenesis and gametic embryogenesis from anther culture of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Int J Agric Crop Sci 5(10):1089Google Scholar
  12. Kurtar ES, Balkaya A, Kandemir D (2016) Evaluation of haploidization efficiency in winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) and pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) through anther culture. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 127(2):497–511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1074-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lotfi M, Alan AR, Henning MJ, Jahn MM, Earle ED (2003) Production of haploid and doubled haploid plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.) for use in breeding for multiple virus resistance. Plant Cell Rep 21(11):1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Metwally EI, Moustafa SA, El-Sawy BI, Shalaby TA (1998) Haploid plantlets derived by anther culture of Cucurbita pepo. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 52(3):171–176.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005908326663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohamed M, Refaei E (2004) Enhanced haploids regeneration in anther culture of summer squash (Curcurbita pepo L.). Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep 27:57–60Google Scholar
  16. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parra-Vega V, Renau-Morata B, Sifres A, Seguí-Simarro JM (2013) Stress treatments and in vitro culture conditions influence microspore embryogenesis and growth of callus from anther walls of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 112(3):353–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0242-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rakha M, Metwally E, Moustafa S, Etman A, Dewir Y (2012) Evaluation of regenerated strains from six Cucurbita interspecific hybrids obtained through anther and ovule in vitro cultures. Aust J Crop Sci 6(1):23–30Google Scholar
  19. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81(24):8014–8018.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauton A, Dumas de Vaulx R (1987) Obtention de plantes haploides chez melon (Cucumis melo L.) par gynogenese indute par du pollen irraidié. Agronomie 7:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seguí-Simarro JM (2016) Androgenesis in solanaceae. In: Germanà MA, Lambardi M (eds) In vitro embryogenesis. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1359. Springer, New York, pp 209–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2006) Androgenesis induction from tomato anther cultures: callus characterization. Acta Hort 725:855–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2007) Embryogenesis induction, callogenesis, and plant regeneration by in vitro culture of tomato isolated microspores and whole anthers. J Exp Bot 58(5):1119–1132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2008) Pathways to doubled haploidy: chromosome doubling during androgenesis. Cytogenet Genome Res 120(3–4):358–369.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000121085 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shalaby TA (2006) Embryogenesis and plantlets regeneration from anther culture of squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.) as affected by different genotypes. J Agric Res Tanta Univ 32(1):173–183Google Scholar
  26. Song H, Lou QF, Luo XD, Wolukau JN, Diao WP, Qian CT, Chen JF (2007) Regeneration of doubled haploid plants by androgenesis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 90(3):245–254.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9263-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steward FC, Mapes MO, Mears K (1958) Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Am J Bot 45(10):705–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Su YH, Zhao XY, Liu YB, Zhang CL, O’Neill SD, Zhang XS (2009) Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in arabidopsis. Plant J 59(3):448–460.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03880.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Suprunova T, Shmykova N (2008) In vitro induction of haploid plants in unpollinated ovules, anther and microspore culture of Cucumis sativus. In: Cucurbitaceae 2008: proceedings of the IXth Eucarpia meeting on genetics and breeding of cucurbitaceae, pp 371–374Google Scholar
  30. Xie M, Qin L-Y, Pan J-S, He H-L, Wu A-Z, Cai R (2005) Flower morphogenesis and microspore development versus anther culture of cucumber. Acta Bot Boreal-Occid Sin 25(6):1096Google Scholar
  31. Zhan Y, Chen J-F, Malik AA (2009) Embryoid induction and plant regeneration of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) through microspore culture. Acta Hort Sin 36(2):221–226Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi UniversityKermanshahIran
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureBu-Ali Sina UniversityHamedanIran
  3. 3.Cell Biology Group – COMAV InstituteUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations