, 214:118 | Cite as

Introgression of Gossypium barbadense L. into Upland cotton germplasm RMBUP-C4S1

  • Johnie N. JenkinsEmail author
  • Jack C. McCartyJr
  • Dewayne Deng
  • Lige Geng
  • R. W. Hayes
  • D. C. Jones
  • Ruhangiz Mammadova


Gossypium barbadense L. cotton has significantly better fiber quality than Upland cotton (G. hirsutum L.); however, yield and environmental adaptation of G. barbadense is not as wide as Upland. Most cotton in the world is planted to Upland cultivars. Many attempts have been made, over a considerable number of years, to introgress fiber quality alleles from G. barbadense into Upland. However, introgression barriers, primarily in the form of interspecific incompatibility, have limited these traditional approaches. The use of chromosome substitution lines (CSL) as a bridge should provide a more efficient way to introgress alleles from G. barbadense into Upland. We crossed 18 G. barbadense CSL to three cultivars and developed a random mated population. After five cycles of random mating followed by one generation of self-pollination to increase the seed supply, we grew the random mated population and used 139 G. barbadense chromosome specific SSR markers to assess a random sample of 96 plants for introgression. We recovered 121 of 139 marker loci among the 96 plants. The distribution of the G. barbadense alleles ranged from 10 to 28 alleles in each plant. Among the 96 plants we found individual plants with marker loci from 6 to 14 chromosomes or chromosome arms. Identity by descent showed little relatedness among plants and no population structure was indicated by a heat map. Using CSL we were able to develop a mostly Upland random mated population with considerable introgression of G. barbadense alleles which should be useful for breeding.


Chromosome substitution lines Cotton Gossypium barbadense × Gossypium hirsutum interspecific cross Interspecific introgression Upland cotton 



Chromosome substitution line


Chromosome substitution line from G. barbadense L.


Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross


Recombinant inbred lines



Joint contribution of USDA, ARS, Mississippi State, MS, Mississippi State University, and Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC. In cooperation with Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. Received April 5, 2018. This research was supported in part by a Grant (09-541) from Cotton Incorporated, Cary, NC. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names, brand names, trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that may also be suitable.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Don Jones is an employee of Cotton Incorporated.


  1. Blenda A, Fang DD, Rami JF, Garsmeur O, Lou F, Lacape J-M (2012) A high density consensus genetic map of tetraploid cotton that integrates multiple component maps through molecular marker redundancy check. PLoS ONE 12:9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Endrizzi JE (1963) Genetic analysis of six primary monosomes and one tertiary monosome in Gossypium hirsutum. Genetics 48:1625–1633PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Endrizzi JE, Turcotte EL, Kohel RJ (1985) Genetics, cytology, and evolution of Gossypium. Adv Genet 23:271–375Google Scholar
  4. Guo W, Cai C, Wang C, Han Z, Song X, Wang K, Niu X, Wang C, Lu K, Shi B, Zhang T (2007) A microsatellite-based, gene-rich linkage map reveals genome structure, function, and evolution in Gossypium. Genetics 176:527–554. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Horne EC, Kumpatla SP, Patterson KA, Gupta M, Thompson SA (2004) Improved protocols for high throughput sunflower and cotton genomic DNA extraction and PCR fidelity. Plant Mol Biol Rep 22:83–84. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenkins JN, McCarty JC Jr, Gutierrez OA, Hayes RW, Jones DC (2013) Registration of RMBUP-C4, a random-mated population with Gossypium barbadense L. alleles introgressed into Upland cotton germplasm. J Plant Reg 7:224–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. JPM Genomics 7.0 SASGoogle Scholar
  8. Kohel RJ, Yu J, Park Y, Lazo GR (2001) Molecular mapping and characterization of traits controlling fiber quality in cotton. Euphytica 121:163–172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Si Z, Chen H, Zhu X, Cao Z, Zhang T (2017) Genetic dissection of lint yield and fiber quality traits of G. hirsutum in G. barbadense background. Mol Breed 37:9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stelly DM, Saha S, Raska DA, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Gutierrez OA (2005) Registration of 17 Upland (Gossypium hirsutum) cotton germplasm lines disomic for different G. barbadense chromosome or arm substitution. Crop Sci 45:2663–2665. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang P, Zhu Y, Song X, Cao Z, Ding Y, Liu B, Zhu X, Wang S, Guo W, Zhang T (2012) Inheritance of long staple fiber quality traits of Gossypium barbadense in G. hirsutum background using CSIL’s. Theor Appl Genet 124:1415–1428. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yu Y, Yuan D, Liang S, Li X, Wang X, Lin Z, Zhang X (2011) Genome stsructure of cotton revealed by a genome-wide SSR genetic map constructed from a BC1 population between Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense. BMC Genom 12:15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang J, Percy RG, McCarty JC Jr (2014) Introgression genetics and breeding between Upland and Pima cotton: a review. Euphytica 198:1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA-ARSMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Crop Germplasm Preservation, Identification, and Introduction, Institute of Cereal and Oil CropsHebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Crop Genetics and Breeding Laboratory of Hebei ProvinceShijiazhuangChina
  3. 3.Cotton IncorporatedCaryUSA
  4. 4.Genetic Resources Institute of AzerbaijanNational Academy of SciencesBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations