Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 209, Issue 1, pp 113–119 | Cite as

How to advance up to seven generations of canola (Brassica napus L.) per annum for the production of pure line populations?

  • Y. Yao
  • P. Zhang
  • H. B. Wang
  • Z. Y. LuEmail author
  • C. J. Liu
  • H. Liu
  • G. J. YanEmail author
Article

Abstract

One of the critical factors restricting the progress in crop breeding and genetic studies is the time required in generating desired ‘pure line’ segregating populations. We developed a procedure that can advance up to seven generations of canola per annum, allowing the production of pure line populations within a year. An ‘all soil’ method was compared with an ‘embryo culture plus soil’ procedure. Treatment of keeping only a single pod per plant was compared with that of keeping many pods per plant. Five generations per annum were achieved using the ‘all soil’ method, when plants were under conditions of high temperature, water stress, long lighting hours and natural seed maturation. Seven generations per annum were achieved using the ‘embryo culture plus soil’ procedure keeping a single pod per plant. This fast generation procedure is being used in producing recombinant inbreeding lines and near isogenic lines in our research programme and its wider adoption could facilitate canola breeding and other biological studies.

Keywords

Efficient breeding Embryo culture RIL and NIL production Short generation cycle 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support from the Australian Council of Grain Grower Organisations (COGGO) Research Fund 2014–2015, National Natural Science Foundation of China (41273100), and Guangzhou Education Bureau Innovation Team Project (No. 13C02) are appreciated. Y. Yao would like to thank China Scholarship Council (CSC) for her visiting scholarship at The University of Western Australia.

References

  1. Chase SS (1952) Production of homozygous diploids of maize from monoploids. Agron J 44:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cowling WA (2007) Genetic diversity in Australian canola and implications for crop breeding for changing future environments. Field Crop Res 104:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edward J, Hertel K (2011) Procrop canola growth and development. Publication of State of New South Wales through Department of Primary Industries. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/516181/Procrop-canola-growth-and-development.pdf
  4. Ferrie AMR, Keller WA (2004) Brassica improvement through microspore culture. Biotechnol Agric For 54:149–168Google Scholar
  5. Ferrie AMR, Mollers C (2010) Haploids and doubled haploids in Brassica spp. for genetic and genomic research. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fletcher RS, Mullen JL, Yoder S, Bauerle WL, Reuning G, Sen S, Meyer E, Juenger TE, McKay JK (2013) Development of a next-generation NIL library in Arabidopsis thaliana for dissecting complex traits. BMC Genom 14:655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gu HH, Hagberg P, Zhou WJ (2004) Cold pretreatment enhances microspore embryogenesis in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Growth Regul 42:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kott LS, Beversdorf WD (1990) Enhanced plant regeneration from microspore-derived embryos of Brassica napus by chilling, partial desiccation and age selection. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 23:187–192Google Scholar
  9. Ma J, Yan GJ, Liu CJ (2011) Development of near-isogenic lines for a major QTL on 3BL conferring Fusarium crown rot resistance in hexaploid wheat. Euphytica 183:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mohapatra D, Bajaj YPS (1987) Interspecific hybridization in Brassica juncea × Brassica hirta using embryo rescue. Euphytica 36:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murashige and Skoog (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ochatt SJ, Sangwan RS (2008) In vitro shortening of generation time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 93:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ochatt SJ, Pontecaille C, Rancillac M (2000) The growth regulators used for bud regeneration and shoot rooting affect the competence for flowering and seed set in regenerated plants of protein peas. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plants 36:188–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ochatt SJ, Sangwan RS, Marget PY, Ndong YA, Rancillac M, Perney P (2002) New approaches towards the shortening of generation cycles for faster breeding of protein legumes. Plant Breed 121:436–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Panguluri SK, Kumar AA (eds) (2013) Phenotyping for plant breeding: applications of phenotyping methods for crop improvement. Springer Science & Business Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Potter T, Burton W, Edwards J, Wratten N, Mailer R, Seberry D (2009) Comparison of historical canola varieties in Australia. 16th Australian research assembly on Brassicas. Ballarat VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ribalta FM, Croser JS, Erskine W, Finnegan PM, Lulsdorf MM, Ochatt SJ (2014) Antigibberellin-induced reduction of internode length favors in vitro flowering and seed-set in different pea genotypes. Biol Plantarum 58:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shumilina DV, Shmykova NA, Bondareva LL, Suprunova TP (2015) Effect of genotype and medium culture content on microspore-derived embryo formation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis) cv Lastochka. Biol Bull 42:302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Takahira J, Cousin A, Nelson MN, Cowling WA (2011) Improvement in efficiency of microspore culture to produce doubled haploid canola (Brassica napus L.) by flow cytometry. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang HB, Wang YX, Zhao H (2003) How to accelerate the process of plant genetic modification. J Hebei Agr Sci 7:50–56Google Scholar
  21. Wang TT, Cai XF, Zhang JH, Li HX, Ye ZB (2010) The culture and early male sterile identification of distant hybrid embryos derived from Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. and male sterile line in B. juncea. Acta Hortic Sin 37:1661–1666Google Scholar
  22. Xu L, Najeeb U, Tang GX, Gu HH, Zhang GQ, He Y, Zhou WJ (2007) Haploid and doubled haploid technology. In: Gupta SK (ed) Rapeseed breeding, Advances in Botanical Research. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 181–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang GQ, Zhang DQ, Tang GX, He Y, Zhou WJ (2006) Plant development from microspore-derived embryos in oilseed rape as affected by chilling, desiccation and cotyledon excision. Biol Plantarum 50:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zheng Z, Wang HB, Chen GD, Yan GJ, Liu CJ (2013) A procedure allowing up to eight generations of wheat and nine generations of barley per annum. Euphytica 191:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Life Science, Key Laboratory for Functional Study on Plant Stress-Resistant GenesGuangzhou UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and The UWA Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Hebei Centre of Plant Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics and PhysiologyHebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry SciencesShijiazhuangChina
  4. 4.Academy of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Sciences in Inner MongoliaHuhehotChina
  5. 5.CSIRO Agriculture FlagshipSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations