Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 205, Issue 1, pp 219–230 | Cite as

Breeding maize for traditional and organic agriculture

  • Pedro RevillaEmail author
  • Jose Ignacio Ruiz de Galarreta
  • Rosa Ana Malvar
  • Arsenio Landa
  • Amando Ordás
Article

Abstract

Breeding maize (Zea mays L.) for traditional agriculture can increase quality and added value of agricultural products and allow the recovery of traditional foods. The objectives of this work were to evaluate improved open-pollinated populations under organic and conventional agriculture in order to determine the effects of selection for yield and flour yield and the relationship between agronomic and quality traits under both cropping systems. We have selected open-pollinated maize populations for flour yield and bakery quality under organic conditions, improved them under conventional conditions and evaluated the breeding programs under organic and conventional conditions. Breeding was efficient for grain and flour yield under organic agriculture for Meiro (an open-pollinated population with black grains) but not for the other populations neither in organic nor in conventional conditions. Yield ranks of varieties were moderately correlated under both conditions, and genotype × environment interaction (GE) was significant for most traits when the analyses of variance were made over all environments but also when organic and conventional environments were separated. GE was higher under organic agriculture. Correlations between traits were higher under conventional agriculture and there were important discrepancies between correlations in organic and conventional agriculture. We concluded that selection under conventional agriculture was efficient for one population under organic agriculture. Selection under the target environment could increase the possibilities of success.

Keywords

Organic agriculture Yield Quality Germplasm Breeding 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research was supported by the Spanish Plan for Research and Development (project code AGL2010-22254), the Basque Government, and the Diputación Provincial de Pontevedra.

References

  1. Alonso Ferro RC, Malvar RA, Revilla P, Ordás A, Castro P, Moreno-González J (2008) Inheritance of quality and agronomic traits in hard endosperm maize for human food. J Agric Sci 146:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardelean M, Cordea M, Haş V, Bors A (2012) G × E Interaction on yield stability of five sweet corn hybrids grown under different agricultural systems. Not Botkert Hort Agrobot 40:290–292Google Scholar
  3. Boller B, Tanner P, Schubiger FX (2008) Breeding forage grasses for organic conditions. Euphytica 163:459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burger H, Schloen M, Schmidt W, Geiger HH (2008) Quantitative genetic studies on breeding maize for adaptation to organic farming. Euphytica 163:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duarte AP, Mason SC, Jackson DS, Kiehl JC (2005) Grain quality of Brazilian genotypes as influenced by nitrogen level. Crop Sci 45:1958–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. He H, Hoseney RC (1991) Gas retention at different cereal flours. Cereal Chem 68:334–336Google Scholar
  7. Kovacevic D, Lazic B (2012) Modern trends in the development of agriculture and demands on plant breeding and soil management. Genetika 44:201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Landa A, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Butrón A, Ordás A (2006) Maíz para panificación. Agricultura 886:506–509Google Scholar
  9. Lazcano C, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Domínguez J (2011) Yield and fruit quality of four sweet corn hybrids (Zea mays) under conventional and integrated fertilization with vermicompost. J Sci Food Agric 91:1244–1253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leford DR, Russell WA (1985) Evaluation of physical grain quality in the BS17 and BS1(HS)C1 synthetics of maize. Crop Sci 25:471–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2008) Genetic correlation between corn performance in organic and conventional production systems. Crop Sci 48:903–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Löschenberger F, Fleck A, Grausgruber H, Hetzendorfer H, Hof G, Lafferty J, Marn M, Neumayer A, Pfaffinger G, Birschitzky J (2008) Breeding for organic agriculture: the example of winter wheat in Austria. Euphytica 163:469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Malvar RA, Revilla P, Moreno-González J, Butrón A, Sotelo J, Ordás A (2008) White maize: genetics of quality and agronomic performance. Crop Sci 48:1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy K, Lammer D, Lyon S, Carter B, Jones SS (2005) Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: an evolutionary–participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renew Agric Food Syst 20:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poneleit CG (2001) Breeding white endosperm maize. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty corns, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 235–273Google Scholar
  16. Revilla P, Landa A, Rodríguez VM, Romay MC, Ordás A, Malvar RA (2008) Maize for bread under organic agriculture. SJAR 6:241–247Google Scholar
  17. Revilla P, Landa A, Rodríguez A, Ordas A, Malvar RA (2012) Influence of growing and storage conditions on bakery quality of traditional maize varieties under organic agriculture. Crop Sci 52:593–600Google Scholar
  18. Rodrigues de Oliveira L, Vieira Miranda G, Oliveira DeLima R, Vagno de Souza L, Cardoso Galvão JC, Cristina dos Santos I (2011) Combining ability of tropical maize cultivars in organic and conventional production systems. Ciênc Rural 41:739–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodríguez VM, Soengas P, Landa A, Ordá A, Revilla P (2013) Effects of selection for color intensity on antioxidant activity in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica 193:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Romay MC, Ordás B, Revilla P, Ordás A (2011) Three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in two Spanish maize synthetics. Crop Sci 51:1016–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SAS Institute (2010) SAS Version 9.3. The SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  22. Serna-Saldivar SO, Gómez MH, Rooney LW (2001) Food uses of regular and specialty corns and their dry-milled fractions. In: Hallauer AR (ed) specialty corn. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, pp 303–337Google Scholar
  23. Troyer AF (1999) Background of U.S. hybrid maize. Crop Sci 39:601–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vales MI, Malvar RA, Revilla P, Ordas A (2001) Recurrent selection for grain yield in two Spanish maize synthetic populations. Crop Sci 41:15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Bueren ETL, Jones SS, Tamm L, Murphy KM, Myers JR, Leifert C, Messmer MM (2011) The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: a review. Njas-Wagening J Life Sci 58:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Watson SA (1988) Maize marketing, processing, and utilization. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Maize and maize improvement, 3rd edn. American Society Agronomy, Madison, pp 881–940Google Scholar
  27. Weyhrich RA (1998) Responses to seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci 38:308–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wolfe MS, Baresel JP, Desclaux D, Goldringer I, Hoad S, Kovacs G, Löschenberger F, Miedaner T, Østergård H, van Bueren ETL (2008) Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica 163:323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Revilla
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jose Ignacio Ruiz de Galarreta
    • 2
  • Rosa Ana Malvar
    • 1
  • Arsenio Landa
    • 3
  • Amando Ordás
    • 1
  1. 1.Misión Biológica de GaliciaSpanish Council for Scientific ResearchPontevedraSpain
  2. 2.NEIKER-Instituto Vasco de Investigación y Desarrollo AgrarioVitoriaSpain
  3. 3.Promotora Orxeira S.AOurenseSpain

Personalised recommendations