Euphytica

, Volume 204, Issue 2, pp 383–394 | Cite as

Effect of cytoplasmic diversity on post anthesis heat tolerance in wheat

  • Shyamal Krisna Talukder
  • P. V. Vara Prasad
  • Tim Todd
  • Md Ali Babar
  • Jesse Poland
  • Robert Bowden
  • Allan Fritz
Article

Abstract

To study the cytoplasmic effects on heat tolerance, the nuclear genomes of ten alloplasmic lines were substituted by four or five backcrosses using ‘Karl 92’, ‘Ventnor’, ‘U1275’ and ‘Jagger’ as the recurrent parent. During the final backcross, reciprocal crosses were made to develop cytoplasmic near isogenic lines. Sixty-eight BC5F1/BC4F1 lines and their parents were evaluated in growth chambers for post anthesis heat tolerance. Plants were grown in the greenhouse and subjected to heat stress in growth chambers 10 days after anthesis for 14 days. Growth chambers were maintained at 35/30 °C for heat stress treatment. To create an optimum temperature treatment, the greenhouse was maintained at 20/15 °C. Effects of high temperature on chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm (photosystem II measuring parameter) were significantly affected by different cytoplasms. Seven cytoplasms showed improved tolerance to heat with at least one recurrent parent. These results indicate that cytoplasmic variations can contribute to an increase in chlorophyll content and quantum efficiency of photosystem II of wheat during heat stress, and also highlight the importance of the interaction between cytoplasmic and nuclear genes. The role of cytoplasm may be considered in wheat breeding programs aimed at improving heat tolerance, but the nature of the interaction between cytoplasm and nuclear gene content warrants further investigation.

Keywords

Grain filling duration Near isogenic lines Thousand kernel weight Alloplasmic line Backcrossing Reciprocal crossing 

Supplementary material

10681_2014_1350_MOESM1_ESM.docx (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 51 kb)

References

  1. Allan R (1997) Registration of 10 pairs of alloplasmic and euplasmic Stephens wheat germplasm. Crop Sci 37(3):1033–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JO (2005) Effect of teosinte cytoplasmic genomes on maize phenotype. Genetics 169(2):863–880PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibi A, Oosterhuis D, Gonias E (2008) Photosynthesis, quantum yield of photosystem II and membrane leakage as affected by high temperatures in cotton genotypes. J Cotton Sci 12:150–159Google Scholar
  4. Budar F, Roux F (2011) The role of organelle genomes in plant adaptation. Plant Signal Behav 6:635–639PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke JJ (1998) Characterization of acquired thermotolerance in soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem 36(8):601–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao W, Scoles G, Hucl P, Chibbar R (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of five morphological groups of hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell.) based on RAPD analysis. Genome 43(4):724–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carmer SG, Swanson MR (1973) An evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by Monte Carlo methods. J Am Stat Assoc 68(341):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cothren J (1999) Physiology of the cotton plant. Cotton: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, Danvers, pp 207–268Google Scholar
  9. Diethelm R, Shibles R, Green D, Shoemaker R (1989) Cytoplasmic effects on photosynthetic activities of soybean leaves. Crop Sci 29(2):334–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekiz H, Kiral AS, Akcin A, Simsek L (1998) Cytoplasmic effects on quality traits of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 100(1–3):189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gorantla M, Babu P, Lachagari VR, Reddy A, Wusirika R, Bennetzen JL, Reddy AR (2007) Identification of stress-responsive genes in an indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) using ESTs generated from drought-stressed seedlings. J Exp Bot 58(2):253–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hand ML, Cogan NO, Stewart AV, Forster JW (2010) Evolutionary history of tall fescue morphotypes inferred from molecular phylogenetics of the Lolium-Festuca species complex. BMC Evol Biol 10(1):303PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson MR (1991) Plant mitochondrial mutations and male sterility. Annu Rev Genet 25(1):461–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ishii T, Mori N, Ogihara Y (2001) Evaluation of allelic diversity at chloroplast microsatellite loci among common wheat and its ancestral species. Theor Appl Genet 103(6–7):896–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen RG, Bahr JT (1977) Ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 28(1):379–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kirk JT, Tilney-Bassett RA (1978) Plastids, their chemistry, structure, growth, and inheritance, 2nd edn. Elsvier North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Kofoid K, Maan S (1982) Agronomic and bread-making performance of fertile alloplasmic wheats. Crop Sci 22(4):725–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar R, Sagar P (2010) Effect of cytoplasm on combining ability and yield attributes in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 70(3):247–256Google Scholar
  19. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Inst, CaryGoogle Scholar
  20. Mullarkey M, Jones P (2000) Isolation and analysis of thermotolerant mutants of wheat. J Exp Bot 51(342):139–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paliwal R, Röder MS, Kumar U, Srivastava J, Joshi AK (2012) QTL mapping of terminal heat tolerance in hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 125(3):561–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petersen G, Seberg O, Yde M, Berthelsen K (2006) Phylogenetic relationships of Triticum and Aegilops and evidence for the origin of the A, B, and D genomes of common wheat (Triticum aestivum). Mol Phylogenet Evol 39(1):70–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Prasad P, Pisipati S, Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Fritz A (2008) Impact of nighttime temperature on physiology and growth of spring wheat. Crop Sci 48(6):2372–2380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Provan J, Wolters P, Caldwell K, Powell W (2004) High-resolution organellar genome analysis of Triticum and Aegilops sheds new light on cytoplasm evolution in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 108(6):1182–1190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reynolds M, Balota M, Delgado M, Amani I, Fischer R (1994) Physiological and morphological traits associated with spring wheat yield under hot, irrigated conditions. Funct Plant Biol 21(6):717–730Google Scholar
  26. Ristic Z, Bukovnik U, Prasad PV (2007) Correlation between heat stability of thylakoid membranes and loss of chlorophyll in winter wheat under heat stress. Crop Sci 47(5):2067–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roach DA, Wulff RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:209–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sears R, Moffatt J, Martin T, Cox T, Bequette R, Curran S, Chung O, Heer W, Long J, Witt M (1997) Registration of ‘Jagger’wheat. Crop Sci 37(3):1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shonnard GC, Gepts P (1994) Genetics of heat tolerance during reproductive development in common bean. Crop Sci 34(5):1168–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sutka J, Worland A, Maystrenko O (1991) Slight effect of the cytoplasm on frost-resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Res Commun 19(3):311–317Google Scholar
  31. Taiz L, Zeiger E (2006) Secondary metabolites and plant defense. Plant Physiol 4:315–344Google Scholar
  32. Tao D, Hu F, Yang J, Yang G, Yang Y, Xu P, Li J, Ye C, Dai L (2004) Cytoplasm and cytoplasm-nucleus interactions affect agronomic traits in japonica rice. Euphytica 135(1):129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vedel F, Quetier F, Dosba F, Doussinault G (1978) Study of wheat phylogeny by coRI analysis of chloroplastic and mitochondrial DNAs. Plant Sci Lett 13(2):97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vedel F, Quetier F, Cauderon Y, Dosba F, Doussinault G (1981) Studies on maternal inheritance in polyploid wheats with cytoplasmic DNAs as genetic markers. Theor Appl Genet 59(4):239–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad M (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61(3):199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wardlaw IF (1974) Temperature control of translocation. In: Bielske RL, Ferguson AR, Cresswell MM (eds) Mechanism of regulation of plant growth. Bull. Royal Soc., Wellington, pp 533–538Google Scholar
  37. Wardlaw IF, Blumenthal C, Larroque O, Wrigley CW (2002) Contrasting effects of chronic heat stress and heat shock on kernel weight and flour quality in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 29(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu CA, Campbell DR (2007) Leaf physiology reflects environmental differences and cytoplasmic background in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrids. Am J Bot 94(11):1804–1812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yadav O (1994) Effect of A1 cytoplasm on the combining ability for smut severity in pearl millet. Theor Appl Genet 88(1):28–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang J, Sears R, Gill B, Paulsen G (2002a) Growth and senescence characteristics associated with tolerance of wheat-alien amphiploids to high temperature under controlled conditions. Euphytica 126(2):185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang J, Sears R, Gill B, Paulsen G (2002b) Quantitative and molecular characterization of heat tolerance in hexaploid wheat. Euphytica 126(2):275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shyamal Krisna Talukder
    • 1
  • P. V. Vara Prasad
    • 2
  • Tim Todd
    • 3
  • Md Ali Babar
    • 4
  • Jesse Poland
    • 3
  • Robert Bowden
    • 5
  • Allan Fritz
    • 6
  1. 1.Forage Improvement DivisionThe Samuel Roberts Noble FoundationArdmoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Plant PathologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.Department of AgronomyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  5. 5.USDA/ARS/Hard Winter Wheat Genetics Research UnitKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  6. 6.Department of AgronomyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations