, Volume 203, Issue 2, pp 367–374 | Cite as

Molecular diagnosis to identify new sources of resistance to sclerotinia blight in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  • Engin Yol
  • Hari D. Upadhyaya
  • Bulent Uzun


Sclerotinia blight, caused by soil-borne fungus Sclerotinia minor Jagger, is one of the destructive diseases in groundnut. Pathogen affected plants usually displays lesions, wilt and collapse which cause high yield losses. Traditional field screening is time and resources consuming. Molecular markers associated with resistance genes offer an alternative selection technique which is relatively easy, more definite and not influenced by environmental fluctuations. In the present investigation, a marker-assisted diagnosis was done to screen 256 diverse germplasm for the presence or absence of SSR markers reported resistance or susceptibility to sclerotinia blight. One hundred and forty two genotypes from different botanical varieties were recognized as new potential sources of resistance to sclerotinia blight for field evaluation. The banding pattern related to the disease resistance is observed at high frequency in the variety vulgaris (39.4 %) and less distributed in the varieties fastigiata (38.0 %) and hypogaea (19.7 %) among the resistant genotypes in the collection. These genotypes had same banding pattern as reported for resistance germplasm. This work reports the successful application of marker-assisted diagnosis as a tool to identify resistance to sclerotinia blight in diverse collections.


Sclerotinia minor Jagger Disease resistance Pathogen Molecular markers Marker-assisted selection 



This study was supported by the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology of Turkey with the grant number of SANTEZ-01527-STZ-2012-2. We are grateful to International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Gene bank, Hyderabad, India for supplying genetic material and to the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University for continuous supports.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.


  1. Arus P, Moreno-Gonzalez J (1993) Marker-assisted selection. In: Hayward MD, Bosemark NO, Romagosa I (eds) Plant breeding: principles and prospects. Chapman and Hall, Cambridge, pp 315–331Google Scholar
  2. Ashkani S, Rafii MY, Rusli I, Sariah M, Abdullah SNA, Rahim HA, Latif MA (2012) SSRs for marker-assisted selection for blast resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol Report 30:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey JE, Brune PD (1997) Effect of crop pruning on Sclerotinia blight of peanut. Plant Dis 81:990–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boopathi NM (2013) Genetic mapping and marker assisted selection. Springer, IndiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butzler TM, Bailey J, Beute MK (1998) Integrated management of Sclerotinia blight in peanut: utilizing canopy morphology, mechanical pruning, and fungicide timing. Plant Dis 82:1312–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlin KDC, Melouk HA, Payton ME (2010) Evaluation of the U.S. peanut mini core collection using a molecular marker for resistance to Sclerotinia minor Jagger. Euphytica 172:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chenault KD, Maas A, Melouk HA, Payton ME (2009) Discovery and characterization of a molecular marker for Sclerotinia minor (Jagger) resistance in peanut. Euphytica 166:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  9. Ender M, Terpstra K, Kelly JD (2008) Marker-assisted selection for white mold resistance in common bean. Mol Breed 21:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2012) FAOSTAT. FAO, Rome. Accessed 18 June 2014
  11. Ferguson ME, Burow MD, Schulze SR, Bramel PJ, Paterson AH, Kresovich S, Mitchell S (2004) Microsatellite identification and characterization in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Theor Appl Genet 108:1064–1070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gil SV, Harob R, Oddinoc C, Kearneyc M, Zuzac M, Marinellic A, Marcha GJ (2008) Crop management practices in the control of peanut diseases caused by soilborne fungi. Crop Prot 27:1–9Google Scholar
  13. Gregory W, Krapovickas A, Gregory M (1980) Structure, variation, evolution, and classification in Arachis. In: Summerfield R, Bunting A (eds) Advances in legume science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, pp 469–481Google Scholar
  14. Krapovickas SA, Rigoni VA (1994) Taxonomia del genero Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8:1–186Google Scholar
  15. Laemmlen F (2001) Sclerotinia diseases. Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California Publication, 8042:1–5Google Scholar
  16. Liao B, Holbrook C (2007) Groundnut. In: Singh RJ (ed) Genetics resources, chromosome engineering and crop improvement, Oilseed Crops, vol 4. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 231–289Google Scholar
  17. Livingstone DM, Hampton JL, Phipps PM, Grabau EA (2005) Enhancing resistance to Sclerotinia minor in peanut by expressing a barley oxalate oxidase gene. Plant Physiol 137:1354–1362CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mace ES, Phong DT, Upadhyaya HD, Chandra S, Crouch JH (2006) SSR analysis of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm resistant to rust and late leaf spot diseases. Euphytica 152:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melouk HA, Backman PA (1995) Management of soil borne fungal pathogens. In: Melouk HA, Shokes FM (eds) Peanut health management. APS, Minnesota, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  20. Mondal S, Badigannavar AM (2010) Molecular diversity and association of SSR markers to rust and late leaf spot resistance in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Breed 129:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murty UR, Jahnavi MR (1983) Breeding potential of interspecific tetraploids in Arachis L. In: Feakin SD (ed) Proceedings of an international workshop on cytogenetics of Arachis. ICRISAT, Patancheru, pp 125–130Google Scholar
  22. Nagy ED, Chu Y, Guo Y, Khanal S, Tang S, Li Y, Dong W, Timper P, Taylor C, Ozias-Akins P, Holbrook CC, Beilinson V, Nielsen NC, Stalker HT, Knapp SJ (2010) Recombination is suppressed in an alien introgression on chromosome 5A of peanut harboring Rma, a dominant root knot nematode resistance gene. Mol Breed 26:357–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nigam SN, Aruna R (2008) Improving breeding efficiency for early maturity in peanut. Plant Breed Rev 30:295–316Google Scholar
  24. Porter DM, Melouk HM (1997) Sclerotinia blight. In: Kokalis-Burelle N, Porter DM, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Smith DH, Subrahmanyam P (eds) Compendium of peanut diseases, 2nd edn. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, pp 34–35Google Scholar
  25. Porter DM, Beute MK, Wyne JC (1975) Resistance of peanut germplasm to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Peanut Sci 2:78–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sarvamangala C, Gowda MVC, Varshney RK (2011) Identification of quantitative trait loci for protein content, oil content and oil quality for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Fıeld Crop Res 122:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shoba D, Manivannan N, Vindhiyavarman P, Nigam SN (2012) SSR markers associated for late leaf spot disease resistance by bulked segregant analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 188:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith FD, Phipps PM, Stipes RJ (1992) Fluazinam: a new fungicide for control of sclerotinia blight and other soil borne diseases of peanut. Peanut Sci 19:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tallury SP, Hollowell JE, Isleib TG, Stalker HT (2014) Greenhouse evaluation of section Arachis wild species for sclerotinia blight and cylindrocladium black rot resistance. Peanut Sci 41:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thiessen LD, Woodward JE (2012) Diseases of peanut caused by soilborne pathogens in the Southwestern United States. ISRN Agron 2012:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Upadhyaya HD, Bramel PJ, Ortiz R, Singh S (2002) Developing a mini core of peanut for utilization of genetic resources. Crop Sci 42:2150–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Upadhyaya HD, Sharma S, Dwivedi SL (2011) Arachis. In: Chittaranjan K (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources legume crops and forages. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu BM, Subbarao KV (2003) Effects of irrigation and tillage on the dynamics of Sclerotinia minor sclerotia and lettuce drop incidence. Phytopathology 93:1572–1580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Field Crops, Faculty of AgricultureAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations