Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 197, Issue 2, pp 295–302 | Cite as

Selection efficiency of tunnel length and stalk breakage to obtain maize inbred lines resistant to stem borer attack

  • A. Butrón
  • F. Samayoa
  • R. Santiago
  • R. A. Malvar
Article

Abstract

There is not any conclusive result about the most suitable trait for performing pedigree selection for improving maize performance against corn borer attack: tunnel length or stalk breakage. We have used simultaneously both selection traits in the same genetic backgrounds and the objective of the present work has been to compare the suitability of pedigree selection for tunnel length and stalk breakage in order to obtain inbred lines that per se and in hybrid combination show lower stem damage and good agronomic performance. Tunnel length is better as selection criteria for increasing resistance to corn borers, but, in some genetic backgrounds, genetic linkage between yield and stalk tunneling by stem borers could make that selection for reduced tunnel length resulted in significant yield reductions.

Keywords

Maize Plant breeding Selection method Resistance to stem borers 

References

  1. Abel CA, Berhow MA, Wilson RL, Binder BF, Hibbard BE (2000a) Evaluation of conventional resistance to European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in experimental maize lines developed from a backcross breeding program. J Econ Entomol 93:1814–1821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abel CA, Wilson RL, Wiseman BR, White WH, Davis FM (2000b) Conventional resistance of experimental maize lines to corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), and sugarcane borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). J Econ Entomol 93:982–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butron A, Malvar RA, Cartea ME, Ordas A, Velasco P (1999a) Resistance of maize inbreds to pink stem borer. Crop Sci 39:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butron A, Malvar RA, Velasco P, Vales MI, Ordas A (1999b) Combining abilities for maize stem antibiosis, yield loss, and yield under infestation and non infestation with pink stem borer. Crop Sci 39:691–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butron A, Malvar RA, Revilla P, Soengas P, Ordas A (2002) Rind puncture resistance in maize: inheritance and relationship with resistance to pink stem borer attack. Plant Breed 121:378–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butron A, Sandoya G, Santiago R, Ordas A, Rial A, Malvar RA (2006) Searching for new sources of pink stem borer resistance in maize (Zea mays L.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 53:1455–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butrón A, Romay MC, Peña-Asín J, Alvarez A, Malvar RA (2012) Genetic relationship between maize resistance to corn borer attack and yield. Crop Sci 52:1176–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carena MJ, Bergman G, Riveland N, Eriksmoen E, Halvorson M (2009) Breeding maize for higher yield and quality under drought stress. Maydica 54:287–296Google Scholar
  9. Cartea ME, Malvar RA, Butron A, Vales MI, Ordas A (1999) Inheritance of antibiosis to Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize. J Econ Entomol 92:994–998Google Scholar
  10. Duvick DN (2005) The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize (Zea mays L.). In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in Agronomy, vol 86. pp 83–145Google Scholar
  11. Eizaguirre M, Albajes R (1992) Diapause induction in the stem corn-borer, Sesamia nonagrioides (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Entomologia Generalis 17:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallauer AR, Lamkey KR, Russell WA, White PR (1994) Registration of B97 and B98, two parental inbred lines of maize. Crop Sci 34:318–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kreps RC, Gumber RK, Schulz B, Klein D, Melchinger AE (1998) Genetic variation in testcrosses of European maize inbreds for resistance to the European corn borer and relations to line per se performance. Plant Breed 117:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin SA, Darrah LL, Hibbard BE (2004) Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci 44:711–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayfield K, Betran FJ, Isakeit T, Odvody G, Murray SC, Rooney WL, Carlo Landivar J (2012) Registration of maize germplasm lines Tx736, Tx739, and Tx740 for reducing preharvest aflatoxin accumulation. J Plant Regist 6:88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ordas A, Revilla P, Malvar RA, Cartea ME (1994) Development of sweet corn hybrids adapted to the environmental-conditions of the northwest of spain. Maydica 39:171–175Google Scholar
  17. Panouille A, Anglade P, Boyat A, Gouesnard B, Vible JC, Dupin M (1998) Assessment of 10 years of maize pedigree breeding for European corn borer tolerance and high-yielding combining ability. Agronomie 18:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reid LM, Zhu X, Parker A, Yan W (2009) Increased resistance to Ustilago zeae and Fusarium verticilliodes in maize inbred lines bred for Fusarium graminearum resistance. Euphytica 165:567–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Russell WA, Guthrie WD, Klun JA, Grindeland R (1975) Selection for resistance in maize to first-brood European corn-borer by using leaf-feeding damage of insect and chemical-analysis for DIMBOA in plant. J Econ Entomol 68:31–34Google Scholar
  20. Schulz B, Kreps R, Klein D, Gumber RK, Melchinger AE (1997) Genetic variation among European maize inbreds for resistance to the European corn borer and relation to agronomic traits. Plant Breed 116:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tarter JA, Goodman MM, Holland JB (2003) Test cross performance of semiexotic inbred lines derived from Latin American maize accessions. Crop Sci 43:2272–2278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willmot DB, Hibbard BE, Barry BD, Antonio AQ, Darrah LL (2005) Registration of Mo48 and Mo49 maize germplasm lines with resistance to European corn borer. Crop Sci 45:426–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Butrón
    • 1
  • F. Samayoa
    • 1
  • R. Santiago
    • 1
  • R. A. Malvar
    • 1
  1. 1.Misión Biológica de Galicia (CSIC)PontevedraSpain

Personalised recommendations