, Volume 190, Issue 3, pp 471–479 | Cite as

Developing the next generation of diverse and healthier maize cultivars tolerant to climate changes

  • M. J. Carena


Maize (Zea mays L.) average yields per hectare have significantly increased in the past 80 years. However, the variability of these yields across years has also significantly increased in the past 40 years making newer and genetically narrow-based hybrids, on average, less stable and more susceptible to climate changes. The objective of this research was to develop new sources of short-season inbred lines carrying unique alleles to grow maize hybrids under challenging environments. The North Dakota State University (NDSU) maize germplasm enhancement program has recently developed 10 new and unique exotic short-season populations partially derived from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Mexico, Saint Croix, and the USA. These germplasm sources were created recombining top early-generation NDSU EarlyGEM lines that were extensively tested in hybrid trials for general combining ability of several traits. Results have shown that germplasm carrying unique alleles can break environmental margins for maize production. Unfortunately, maize breeding programs tend to be located in ideal crop production areas instead of exploiting marginal environments for the development of more stable products. The NDSU EarlyGEM program is a successful example of tropical and late-temperate maize germplasm adaptation into short-season environments in order to increase the genetic diversity on farms. However, public sector applied maize breeding programs continue to disappear across the USA and abroad because of changes in research emphasis. Long-term germplasm adaptation and improvement programs carrying unique alleles will be essential in the development of the next generation of healthier cultivars tolerant to climate changes.


Cultivars Climate change Healthier maize NDSU EarlyGEM Zea mays L. 



The North Dakota Corn Utilization Council and the USDA–GEM program have supported the creation of the first generation NDSU EarlyGEM lines and populations to increase the genetic diversity of US northern maize hybrids.


  1. Buckler ES, Holland JB, Bradbury PJ, Acharya CB, Brown PJ, Browne C, Ersoz E, Flint-Garcia S, Garcia A, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, Harjes C, Guill K, Kroon DE, Larsson S, Lepak NK, Li H, Mitchell SE, Pressoir G, Peiffer JA, Rosas MO, Rocherford TR, Romay MC, Romero S, Salvo S, Villeda HS, da Silva HS, Sun Q, Tian F, Upadyayula N, Ware D, Yates H, Yu J, Zhang Z, Kresovich S, McMullen MD (2009) The genetic architecture of maize flowering time. Science 325:714–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carena MJ (2005) Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carena MJ (2011) Germplasm Enhancement for Adaptation to Climate Changes. Crop Breed Appl Biotechol S1:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carena MJ 2012. Challenges and opportunities for developing maize cultivars in the public sector. Euphytica (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Carena MJ, Hallauer AR (2001a) Expression of heterosis in leaming and midland yellow dent populations. J Iowa Acad Sci 108:73–78Google Scholar
  6. Carena MJ, Hallauer AR (2001b) Response to inbred progeny recurrent selection in leaming and midland yellow dent populations. Maydica 46:1–10Google Scholar
  7. Carena MJ, Wicks ZW III (2006a) Maize early maturing hybrids: an exploitation of US temperate public genetic diversity in reserve. Maydica 51:201–208Google Scholar
  8. Carena MJ, Wicks ZW III (2006b) Maize early maturing hybrids: an exploitation of US temperate public genetic diversity in reserve. Maydica 51:201–208Google Scholar
  9. Carena MJ, Eno C, Wanner DW (2008) Registration of NDBS11(FR–M)C3, NDBS1011, and NDBSK(HI–M)C3 maize germplasms. J Plant Reg 2:132–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carena MJ, Pollak L, Salhuana W, Denuc M (2009a) Development of unique lines for early-maturing hybrids: moving GEM germplasm northward and westward. Euphytica 170:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carena MJ, Bergman G, Riveland N, Eriksmoen E, Halvorson M (2009b) Breeding maize for higher yield and quality under drought stress. Maydica 54:287–296Google Scholar
  12. Cochran WG, Cox GM (1957) Experimental design, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodman MM (1985) Exotic maize germplasm: status, prospects, and remedies. Iowa state J Res 59:497–527Google Scholar
  15. Goodman MM (1990) Genetic and germplasms stocks worth conserving. J Hered 81:11–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodman MM (1999) Broadening the genetic diversity in maize breeding by use of exotic germplasm. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  17. Hallauer AR (1978) Potential of exotic germplasm for maize improvement. In: Walsen DB (ed) Maize breeding and genetics. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ (2009) Maize breeding. In: Carena MJ (ed) Handbook of plant breeding: cereal breeding. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallauer AR, Sears JH (1972) Integrating exotic germplasm in to corn belt breeding programs. Crop Sci 12:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallauer AR, Carena MJ, Miranda Fo JB (2010) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 3rd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Mikel MA, Dudley JW (2006) Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci 46:1193–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milton DJ (1970) Plant introduction of maize as a source of oil and unusual fatty acid composition. J Agric Food Chem 18:1970Google Scholar
  23. Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Fortuno JV, Johnson EJ (1965) The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 42:139–144Google Scholar
  24. Pollak LM (2003) The history and success of the public private project on Germplasm enhancement of maize (GEM). Adv Agron 78:45–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rinke EH, Sentz JC (1962) Moving corn belt dent germplasm northward. Minnesota Agric Exp Stn 110:53Google Scholar
  26. Russell WA (1972) Registration of B70 and B73 parental lines of maize. Crop Sci 12:721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sevilla R, Salhuana W (1997) General description of the plan and execution of latin American maize project (LAMP). In: Salhuana W, Sevilla R, Eberhart SA (eds) LAMP final report 1997. Wiley and sons, New York, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  28. Sharma S, Carena MJ (2012) NDSU EarlyGEM: increasing the genetic diversity of northern US hybrids through the development of unique exotic elite lines. Maydica (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Simmonds NW (1993) Introgression and incorporation: strategies for the use of crop genetic resources. Biol Rev 68(4):539–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh SK, Johnson LA, Pollak LM, Hurburgh CR (2001) Compositional, physical and wet-milling properties of accessions used in germplasm enhancement of maize project. Cereal Chem 78(3):330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sprague GF, Federer WT (1951) A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. II error, year × variety, location × variety, and variety components. Agron J 43:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tarter JA, Goodman MM, Holland JB (2004) Recovery of exotic alleles in semi exotic maize inbreds derived from crosses between latin American accessions and a temperate line. Theor Appl Genet 109:609–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Troyer AF (2009) Development of hybrid corn and the seed corn industry. In: Hake JL (ed) Maize handbook-volume II: genetics and genomics. Springer Science Business Media LLC, New York, pp 87–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Uhr DV, Goodman MM (1995) Temperate maize inbreds from tropical germplasm. I testcross yield trials. Crop Sci 35:779–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weatherspoon JH (1970) Comparative yields of single, three-way and double crosses of maize. Crop Sci 10:157–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations