Euphytica

, Volume 191, Issue 2, pp 245–257 | Cite as

Combining ability and GGE biplot analyses for resistance to northern leaf blight in tropical and subtropical elite maize inbred lines

Article

Abstract

The incidence and severity of northern leaf blight (NLB) disease has increased in Southern Africa in the past years with previously resistant cultivars being affected; implying more resistant sources have to be identified and inheritance of NLB resistance investigated. Therefore, 45 F1 hybrids generated in a half diallel mating of ten elite maize inbred lines were evaluated in six environments for combining ability, genotype × environment interaction and effect of NLB disease on grain yield. General and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA) were highly significant (P < 0.001) for both NLB disease and grain yield. The GCA/SCA ratio was close to unity for both NLB (0.96) and grain yield (0.89), indicating predominance of additive over non-additive gene action for the traits in these inbred lines. Parent P2 and P7 had good GCA for both NLB disease resistance and high grain yield. The NLB disease ratings on the maize hybrids and inbreds ranged from 1.0 to 8.5 (approximately 0–75 % severity). Negative slope coefficients of the linear regression indicated maize yield decrease of 280–610 kg ha−1 for NLB final disease severity of about 25–75 %, respectively, stressing the need for resistant cultivars to manage the disease. Genotype and (genotype × environment) (GGE) biplots indicated absence of crossover interaction and revealed positive associations among environments, signifying the suitability of all the environments for disease screening. Therefore, the significant additive effects for NLB disease and grain yield entail that breeding progress would be made through selection and a few disease ‘hot-spot’ sites, such as Cedara (South Africa) and Mpongwe (Zambia) can be used for disease screening.

Keywords

Combining ability Genotype × environment interaction Gene action Maize (Zea mays L.) Northern leaf blight Yield reduction 

References

  1. Aquino P, Carrion F, Calvo R, Flores D (2001) Selected maize statistics. In: Pingali PL (ed) CIMMYT 1999–2000 World maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker RJ (1978) Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci 18:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bello OB, Abdulmaliq SY, Ige SA, Mahamood J, Oluleye F, Azeez MA, Afolabi MS (2012) Evaluation of early and late/intermediate maize varieties for grain yield potential and adaptation to a Southern Guinea savanna agro-ecology of Nigeria. Int J Plant Res 2:14–21Google Scholar
  4. Bookmyer JM, Bonos SA, Meyer WA (2009) Inheritance characteristics of brown patch resistance in tall fescue. Crop Sci 49:2302–2308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen KL, Pedersen WL (1988) Effects of northern leaf blight and detasseling on yields and yield components of corn inbreds. Plant Dis 72:952–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewbaker JL, Logrono ML, Kim SK (1989) The MIR (maize inbred resistance) trials: performance of tropical adapted maize inbreds. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Hawaii Institute of Agriculture and Human Resources Research Series 062Google Scholar
  7. Carson ML (1995) A new gene in maize conferring the “chlorotic halo” reaction to infection by Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis 79:717–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carson ML, Goodman MM, Williamson SM (2002) Variation in aggressiveness among isolates of Cercospora from maize as a potential cause of genotype-environment interaction in gray leaf spot trials. Plant Dis 86:1089–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CIMMYT (1985) Managing trials and reporting data for CIMMYT International Maize Testing Program. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  10. CIMMYT (2001) Maize inbred lines released by CIMMYT: a compilation of 454 CIMMYT maize lines (CMLs), CML1–CML454. August 2001. Second Draft. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  11. CIMMYT Maize Programme (2004) Maize diseases: a guide for field identification, 4th edn. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  12. Coakley SM (1979) Climatic variability in the Pacific Northwest and its effect on stripe rust of winter wheat. Clim Chang 2:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derera J, Tongoona P, Pixley KV, Vivek B, Laing MD, van Rij N (2008) Gene action controlling gray leaf spot resistance in Southern African maize germplasm. Crop Sci 48:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dhliwayo T, Pixley K, Menkir A, Warburton M (2009) Combining ability, genetic distances, and heterosis among elite CIMMYT and IITA tropical maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 49:1201–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Egesi CN, Onyeka TJ, Asiedu R (2009) Environmental stability of resistance to anthracnose and virus diseases of water yam (Dioscorea alata) Afr. J Agric Res 4:113–118Google Scholar
  16. Fairbanks DHK, Benn GA (2000) Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 50:237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher DE, Hooker AL, Lim SM, Smith DR (1976) Leaf infection and yield loss caused by four Helminthosporium leaf diseases of corn. Phytopathology 66:942–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493Google Scholar
  19. Hakiza JJ, Lipps PE, Martin St S, Pratt RC (2004) Heritability and number of genes controlling partial resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize inbred H99. Maydica 49:173–182Google Scholar
  20. Lipps PE, Pratt RE, Hakiza JJ (1997) Interaction of Ht and partial resistance to Exserohilum turcicum in maize. Plant Dis 81:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mawere S, Vincent V, Meyer JD, Pixley K (2006) Resistance of four inbred maize lines to inoculation with 20 isolates of maize streak virus from Zimbabwe. Plant Dis 90:1485–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pataky JK (1992) Relationships between yield of sweet corn and northern leaf blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum. Phytopathology 82:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pataky JK (1994) Effects of races 0 and 1 of Exserohilum turcicum on sweet corn hybrids differing for Ht- and partial resistance to northern leaf blight. Plant Dis 78:1189–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pataky JK, Raid RN, du Toit LJ, Schueneman TJ (1998) Disease severity and yield of sweet corn hybrids with resistance to northern leaf blight. Plant Dis 82:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM (2011) Introduction to GenStat for windows (14th edn). VSN International, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  26. Perkins JM, Pedersen WL (1987) Disease development and yield losses associated with northern corn leaf blight on corn. Plant Dis 71:940–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pratt RC, Gordon SG (2006) Breeding for resistance to maize foliar pathogens. Plant Breed Rev 26:119–173Google Scholar
  28. Raymundo AD, Hooker AL (1981) Measuring the relationship between northern corn leaf blight and yield losses. Plant Dis 65:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid LM, Zhu X (2005) Screening corn for resistance to common diseases in Canada. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Technical Bulletin, Catalogue No.: A42-103/2005E-PDF, ISBN: 0-662-40347-9Google Scholar
  30. SAS Institute Inc (2002) The SAS system for Windows, release 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., CaryGoogle Scholar
  31. Schechert AW, Geiger HH, Welz HG (1997) Generation means and combining ability analysis of resistance to Setosphaeria turcica in African maize. In: Proceedings of the 5th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, Arusha, pp 211–218Google Scholar
  32. Scherm H, Yang XB (1995) Interannual variations in wheat rust development in China and the United States in relation to the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Phytopathology 85:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sharma RC, Payak MM (1990) Durable resistance to two leaf blights in two maize inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 80:542–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sibiya J, Tongoona P, Derera J, Van Rij N, Makanda I (2011) Combining ability analysis for Phaeosphaeria leaf spot resistance and grain yield in tropical advanced maize inbred lines. Field Crop Res 120:86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sibiya J, Tongoona P, Derera J, Van Rij N (2012) Genetic analysis and genotype x environment (G × E) for grey leaf spot disease resistance in elite African maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Euphytica 185:349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sigulas KM, Hill RR, Ayers JE (1988) Genetic analysis of Exserohilum turcicum lesion expansion on corn. Phytopathology 78:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vivek BS, Odongo O, Njuguna J, Imanywoha J, Bigirwa G, Diallo A, Pixley K (2010) Diallel analysis of grain yield and resistance to seven diseases of 12 African maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Euphytica 172:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Welz HG, Geiger HH (2000) Genes for resistance to northern corn leaf blight in diverse maize populations. Plant Breed 119:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan W (2002) Singular-value partitioning in biplot analysis of multienvironmental trial data. Agron J 94:990–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yan W, Kang MS (2003) GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan W, Tinker NA (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and application. Can J Plant Sci 86:623–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE Biplot. Crop Sci 40:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yan W, Kang BM, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-genotype environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang Y, Kang MS (1997) DIALLEL-SAS: a SAS program for Griffing’s diallel analyses. Agron J 89:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Kang MS, Lamkey KR (2005) Diallel-SAS05: a comprehensive program for Griffing’s and Gardner-Eberhart analyses. Agron J 97:1097–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.African Centre for Crop Improvement, School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations