Euphytica

, Volume 190, Issue 2, pp 169–180 | Cite as

Selection of watermelon genotypes for resistance to bacterial fruit blotch

  • Francisco C. Q. Carvalho
  • Liliana A. Santos
  • Rita C. S. Dias
  • Rosa L. R. Mariano
  • Elineide B. Souza
Article

Abstract

Bacterial fruit blotch, caused by Acidovorax citrulli, is a serious threat to the watermelon crop in Brazil. To date, there are no disease-resistant varieties, thus requiring research seeking sources of resistance. To select genotypes with potential use in the management of fruit blotch, the resistance level of watermelon genotypes belonging to the Cucurbits Germplasm Active Bank for the Brazilian Northeast (Banco Ativo de Germoplasma de Cucurbitáceas para o Nordeste Brasileiro—BAG) of Embrapa Semiárido was evaluated at different plant developmental stages: seeds (74 genotypes), seedlings and plants before flowering (29 genotypes) as well as plants during flowering and fruiting (seven genotypes). The genotypes were evaluated for the incidence or severity of the disease, which was estimated with the aid of descriptive scales. Additionally, A. citrulli transmission was determined in seeds derived from symptomatic and asymptomatic fruits. No watermelon genotype was immune to fruit blotch, and the majority showed variations in resistance responses. However, the genotypes BGCIA 979, BGCIA 34 and Sugar Baby showed high levels of resistance at most stages of plant development, thereby suggesting that these genotypes possess fruit blotch resistance genes that could be used in breeding programs. Seeds from symptomatic and asymptomatic fruits of the seven tested genotypes showed transmission rates of A. citrulli up to 35.3 % and 8.7 %, respectively. These results confirm that asymptomatic fruits can harbor contaminated seeds that are responsible for the transmission of the bacteria.

Keywords

Acidovorax citrulli Citrullus lanatus Genetic resistance Pre-breeding Seed transmission 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), for the scholarships awarded to Francisco C. Q. Carvalho, Rosa L. R. Mariano and Elineide B. Souza.

References

  1. Agrianual (2011) Anuário da agricultura brasileira. Instituto FNP, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo DV, Mariano RLR, Michereff SJ (2005) Métodos de inoculação de Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli em melão. Summa Phytopathol 31:69–73Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo LAS (1997) Manual de quantificação de doenças de plantas. Novartis, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahar O, Kritzman G, Burdman S (2009) Bacterial fruit blotch of melon: screens for disease tolerance and role of seed transmission in pathogenicity. Eur J Plant Pathol 123:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buso GSC, Nass LL, Marques ASA, Lopes CA, Buso JA (2004) Avaliação de genótipos de melão, visando identificar fontes de resistência a Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/186368/1/cot116.pdf. Accessed 24 jan 2012
  6. Dutta B, Scherm H, Gitaitis RD, Walcott RR (2011) Acidovorax citrulli seed inoculum load affects seedling transmission and spread of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon under greenhouse conditions. Plant Dis 96:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Faostat (2010) Food And Agriculture Organization Of The United Nations. http://www.fao.org. Accessed 05 feb 2012
  8. Ferreira DF (1992) SISVAR (Sistema para análise de variância para dados balanceados). UFLA, LavrasGoogle Scholar
  9. Goth RW, Webb RE (1981) Resistance of commercial watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) to Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli. Plant Dis 65:671–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halfeld-Vieira BA, Nechet KL (2007) Mancha-aquosa da melancia em Roraima. Fitopatol Bras 32:268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hopkins DL (1991) Chemical control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 104:270–272Google Scholar
  12. Hopkins DL (1993) Field spread of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Phytopathology 83:466Google Scholar
  13. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM (2002) Evaluation of Citrullus sp. germ plasm for resistance to Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Plant Dis 86:61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins DL, Stall B, Kucharek T, Gay D, Gitaitis R, Cook WP, Keinath APB, Latin R (1992) Bacterial fruit blotch in watermelon.http://plantpath.ifas.ufl.edu/takextpub/FactSheets/sicp1.pdf. Accessed 24 feb 2012
  15. Hopkins DL, Thompson CM, Elmstrom GW (1993) Resistance of watermelon seedlings and fruit to the fruit blotch bacterium. HortScience 28:122–123Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins DL, Cucuzza JD, Watterson JC (1996) Wet seed treatments for the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Plant Dis 80:529–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopkins DL, Cucuzza JD, Watterson JC (2003) Wet seed treatment with peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch and other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Dis 87:1495–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latin R, Hopkins DL (1995) Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. The hypothetical exam question becomes reality. Plant Dis 79:761–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macagnan D, Romeiro RS, Mendonça HL, Barreto RW (2003) Mancha bacteriana da melancia: uma nova doença no estado de Minas Gerais. Summa Phytopathol 29:286–287Google Scholar
  20. Moraes ISF, Medeiros FHV, Mariano RLR, Viana IO (2002) Proteção de plantas de melão contra Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli mediada por Bacillus spp. Fitopatol Bras 27:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nascimento ARP, Mariano RLR, Silva EI (2004) Hospedeiros alternativos de Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Hortic Bras 22:345–349Google Scholar
  22. O’brien RG, Martin AL (1999) Bacterial blotch of melons caused by strains of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Aust J Exp Agric 39:479–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira IS, Sales Júnior R, Mariano RLR (2001) Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli: método de isolamento e transmissão por sementes. Fitopatol Bras 26:302Google Scholar
  24. Oliveira IS, Sales Júnior R, Mariano RLR (2003) Ocorrência da mancha-aquosa por Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli em melão-pepino no Brasil. Fitopatol Bras 28:682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira JC, Silveira EB, Mariano RLR, Cardoso E, Viana IO (2007) Caracterização de isolados de Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Fitopatol Bras 32:480–487Google Scholar
  26. Pusey PL, Wilson CL (1984) Postharvest biological control of stone fruit brown rot by Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis 68:753–756Google Scholar
  27. Rane KK, Latin RX (1990) Investigation of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Phytopathology 80:1070Google Scholar
  28. Robbs CF, Rodrigues Neto J, Ramos RS, Sinigaglia C (1991) Mancha bacteriana da melancia no estado de São Paulo, causada por Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli. Fitopatol Bras 16:48Google Scholar
  29. Sales Júnior R, Menezes JB (2001) Mapeamento das doenças fúngicas, bacterianas e viróticas do cultivo do melão no Estado do RN. Technical report. Escola Superior de Agricultura de Mossoró, MossoróGoogle Scholar
  30. Silva KMM (2010) Análise da diversidade de isolados de Acidovorax citrulli. PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, RecifeGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva Neto EB, Medeiros FHV, Mariano RLR, Silveira EB (2003) Controle químico da mancha-aquosa do melão pelo tratamento de sementes. Fitopatol Bras 28:340Google Scholar
  32. Silveira EB, Michereff SJ, Mariano RLR (2003) Severidade da mancha-aquosa em meloeiro sob diferentes condições de molhamento foliar e concentração de inóculo de Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Fitopatol Bras 28:171–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Somodi GC, Jones JB, Hopkins DL, Stall RE, Kucharek TA, Hodge NC, Watterson JC (1991) Occurrence of a bacterial watermelon fruit blotch in Florida. Plant Dis 75:1053–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sowell G, Schaad NW (1979) Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli on watermelon: seed transmission and resistance of plant introductions. Plant Dis 63:437–441Google Scholar
  35. Walcott RR, Langston DB Jr, Sanders FH, Gitaitis RD (2000) Investigating intraspecific variation of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli using DNA fingerprinting and whole cell fatty acid analysis. Phytopathology 90:191–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walcott RR, Gitaitis RD, Castro AC (2003) Role of blossoms in watermelon seed infestation by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Phytopathology 93:528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walcott RR, Fessehaie A, Castro AC (2004) Differences in pathogenicity between two genetically distinct groups of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli on cucurbit hosts. J Phytopathol 152:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wiebe WL, Hopkins DL, Walcott RR (2001) Bacterial Fruit Blotch-A commercial growers guide. http://www.envirologix.com/artman/uploads/BFBGrowerGuide.pdf. Accessed 05 jan 2012

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco C. Q. Carvalho
    • 1
  • Liliana A. Santos
    • 1
  • Rita C. S. Dias
    • 2
  • Rosa L. R. Mariano
    • 1
  • Elineide B. Souza
    • 1
  1. 1.Phytobacteriology Laboratory, Department of AgronomyUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoRecifeBrasil
  2. 2.Embrapa SemiáridoPetrolinaBrasil

Personalised recommendations