Abstract
Sugarcane is known for its highly complex genetics and more knowledge is needed for better use and conservation of genetic materials. In order to identify genotypes and to assess genetic diversity, diverse data sets such as morphological and molecular markers are used as a general approach. To evaluate the usefulness of different markers, important sugarcane genotypes in Argentina were characterized by AFLP, SSR and morphological traits. All genotypes characterized were grouped in one main cluster in dendrograms using two independent softwares. Interestingly, local genotypes grouped together with USA varieties and no clear genetic differentiation could be found probably due to intensive germplasm exchange between these breeding programs. The molecular markers tested were useful for genetic diversity assessment as well as for genotype identification. These markers should be included in the internationally established characters for sugarcane variety protection as they give a better view on whole genome complexity. Additionally, genetic similarities obtained from molecular markers will provide more accurate information to breeders than the pedigree method, especially when considering the asymmetric genetic inheritance of sugarcane. Morphological traits are valuable tools to identify genotypes since they reflect external resemblance more than genetic relatedness. When they were combined with molecular markers the dendogram obtained revealed genetic relationships and the genetic diversity was better estimated. In summary, both methods appear to be useful, complementing each other and should be used together to assist sugarcane breeders in estimating genetic diversity, electing parents for crossings, identifying superior lines and to protect intellectual property rights.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed MA, Cuenya MI, García MB, Díaz Romero C (2007) Dinámica y características del recambio de variedades de caña de azúcar en tucumán desde las primeras décadas del siglo xx hasta la actualidad. Avance Agroindustrial 28:17–22
Aljanabi SM, Forget L, Dookun A (1999) An improved and rapid protocol for the isolation of polysaccharide and polyphenol-free sugarcane DNA. Plant Mol Biol Rep 17:1–8
Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tanksley SD, Sorrells ME (1993) Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36(1):181–186
Angiolillo AM, Mencuccini M, Baldoni L (1999) Olive genetic diversity assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. TAG 98:411–421
Arro JA (2004) Genetic diversity among sugarcane clones using target region amplification polymorphism (TRAP) markers and pedigree relationships. Master of Science Thesis, Agronomy & Environmental Management
Balzarini M, Di Rienzo J (2003) Info-gen: software para análisis estadístico de datos genéticos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Balzarini M, Arroyo A, Bruno C, Di Renzo J (2006) Análisis de datos de marcadores con Info-gen. XXXV Congreso Argentino de Genética, San Luis
Barret BA, Kidwell KK (1998) Comparison of AFLP and pedigree-based genetic diversity assessment methods using wheat cultivars from the Pacific Northwest. Crop Sci 38:1271–1278
Besse PG, Taylor B, Carroll N, Berding D, Burner CL (1998) Assessing genetic diversity in a sugarcane germplasm collection using an automated AFLP analysis. Genetica 104:143–153
Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32(3):314–331
Breaux RD, Legendre BL (1983) The USDA commercial breeding program in Louisiana. Proc Inter Am Sugar Cane Sem Var Breed III:99–105
Bremer G (1961a) Problems in breeding and cytology of sugarcane. Euphytica 10:59–78
Bremer G (1961b) Cytological crossing research of sugar cane. Euphytica 10:229–243
Budak H, Shearman RC, Parmaksiz I, Gaussoin RE, Riordan TP, Dweikat I (2004) Molecular characterization of buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. TAG 108(2):328–334. doi:10.1007/s00122-003-1428-4
Caetano-Anollés G, Gresshoff PM (1994) Staining nucleic acids with silver: an alternative to radioisotopic and fluorescent labeling. Promega Notes Mag 45:13
Chang YS, Lo CC (1993) Genetic relationship among major sugar cane cultivars in Taiwan. Rep Taiwan Sugar Res Inst 140:1–10
Coburn JR, Temnykh SV, Paul EM, McCouch SR (2002) Design and application of microsatellite marker panels for semiautomated genotyping of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Sci 42:2092–2099
Cordeiro GM (2001) Molecular marker systems for sugarcane germplams analysis, Chap. 9. In: Henry RJ (ed) Plant genotyping, the DNA fingerprinting of plants. Cabi publishing, Wallingford
Cordeiro GM, Taylor GO, Henry RJ (2000) Characterisation of microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum sp.), a highly polyploid species. Plant Sci 155(2):161–168
Cordeiro GM, Casu R, McIntyre CL, Manners JM, Henry RJ (2001) Microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) ESTs cross transferable to erianthus and sorghum. Plant Sci 160(6):1115–1123
Cordeiro GM, Pan YB, Henry RJ (2003) Sugarcane microsatellites for the assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm. Plant Sci 165:181–189
Cox TS, Kiang YT, Gorman MB, Rogers DM (1985) Relationships between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybean. Crop Sci 25:529–532
Cuenya MI, Ostengo S, Chavanne ER, Espinosa MA, Costilla DD, Ahmed MA (2009) Relevamiento de la distribución de variedades comerciales y de la aplicación de otras tecnologías en el área de cultivo de la provincia de Tucumán: Campaña 2007–2008. Gacetilla Agroindustrial EEAOC 72
Cuenya MI, Chavanne ER, Ostengo S, García MB, Ahmed M, Costilla DD, Díaz Romero C, Espinosa MA, Delgado N, Díaz JV (2011) TUC 95-10: una nueva variedad de caña de azúcar altamente productiva. Gacetilla Agroindustrial EEAOC 75
Da Silva JA, Bressiani JA (2005) Sucrose synthase molecular marker associated with sugar content in elite sugarcane progeny. Genet Mol Biol 28(2):294–298. doi:10.1590/S1415-47572005000200020
Degani C, Rowland LJ, Saunders JA, Hokanson SC, Ogden E, Golan-Goldrish A, Galetta GL (2001) A comparison of genetic relationship measures in strawberry (Fragaria ananassa duch.) based on AFLP, RAPDs and pedigree data. Euphytica 117:1–12
Demey JR, Zambrano AY, Fuenmayor F, Segovia V (2003) Relación entre caracterizaciones molecular y morfológica en una colección de yuca. Interciencia 28(12):684–689
Deren CW (1995) Genetic base of U.S. mainland sugar cane. Crop Sci 35:1195–1199
D’Hont A, Rao PS, Feldman P, Grivet LN, Islam-Faridi N, Taylo P, Glaszmann JC (1995) Identification and characterization of sugarcane intergereric hybrids, Saccharum officinarum × Eriantus arudinaceus, with molecular markers and DNA in situ hybridisation. TAG 91:320–326
D’Hont A, Seshagiri Rao P, Alleyne S, Glaszmann JC, Feldmann P (1997) Application of molecular markers in sugarcane breeding. Proceedings West Indies sugar technologists, pp 77–79
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2010) InfoStat versión 2009. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297–302
Durán LA, Blair MW, Giraldo MC, Macchiavelli R, Prophete E, Nin JC, Beaver JS (2005) Morphological and molecular characterization of common bean landraces and cultivars from the Caribbean. Crop Sci 45:1320–1328
Gallacher DJ (1997) Optimised descriptors recommended for Australian sugarcane germplasm (Saccharum spp. Hybrid). Aust J Agric Res 48(6):775–779
García MG, Ontivero M, Díaz Ricci JC, Castagnaro AP (2002) Morphological traits and high resolution rapd markers for the identification of the main strawberry varieties cultivated in Argentina. Plant Breed 121:76–80
Gillet EM (1991) Genetic analysis of nuclear DNA restriction fragment patterns. Genome 34(5):693–703
Graner A, Ludwig WF, Melchinger AE (1994) Relationships among European barley germplasm. II. Comparisons of RFLP and pedigree data. Crop Sci 34:1199–1205
Heinz DJ (1987) Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam 603 pp
Hill MH, Witsenboer M, Zabeau P, Vos R, Kesseli R, Michelmore R (1996) PCR-based fingerprinting using AFLPs as a tool for studying genetic relationships in Lactuca spp. TAG 93:1202–1210
Junjian N, Colowit PM, Mackill DJ (2002) Evaluation of genetic diversity in rice subspecies using microsatellite markers. Crop Sci 42:601–607
Kempthorne O (1957) An introduction to genetic statistics. Wiley, New York
Lima ML, Garcia AA, Oliveira KM, Matsuoka S, Arizono H, De Souza CL Jr, De Souza AP (2002) Analysis of genetic similarity detected by aflp and coefficient of parentage among genotypes of sugar cane (Saccharum spp.). TAG 104(1):30–38
Link W, Dixkens C, Singh M (1995) Genetic diversity in European and Mediterranean faba bean germplasm revealed by RAPD markers. TAG 90:27–32
Lu YH, D′Hont A, Paulet F, Grivet L, Arnaud M, Glaszmann JC (1994) Molecular diversity and genome structure in modern sugarcane varieties. Euphytica 78:217–226
Machado JR, Walker DI, Bressiani JA, Goncalves A, da Silva J (1995) Emasculation of sugarcane tassels using hot water. Proc ISSCT 22:346–348
Manifesto MM, Schlatter AR, Hopp HE, Suarez EY, Dubcovsky J (2001) Quantitative evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers. Crop Sci 41:682–690
Manigbas NL, Villegas LC (2004) Microsatellite markers in hybridity tests to identify true hybrids of sugarcane. Phil Crop Sci 29:23–32
Martínez L, Cavagnaro P, Masuelli R, Rodriguez J (2005) Evaluation of diversity among Argentine grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) varieties using morphological data and AFLP markers. Elect J Biotechnol 6:37–45
Maughan PJ, Saghai MA, Maroof GR, Buss GR, Huestis GM (1996) Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) in soybean: species diversity, inheritance, and near-isogenic line analysis. TAG 93:392–401
McIntyre CL, Jackson PA (2001) Low level of selfing found in a sample of crosses in Australian sugarcane breeding programs. Euphytica 117:245–249
Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM (2003) Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants—salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci 43:1235–1248
Mueller UG, Wolfenbarger LL (1999) AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting. Trends Ecol Evol 14:384–394
Nagai C (1984) Emasculation of sugarcane tassels by hot water. Am Rept HSPA 3-4
Paul S, Wachira FN, Powell W, Waugh R (1997) Diversity and genetic differentiation among populations of India and Kenyan tea [Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze] revealed by AFLP-markers. TAG 94:255–263
Plaschke J, Ganal MW, Roder MS (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. TAG 91:1001–1007
Powell W, Machray G, Provan J (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Plant Sci 1:215–222
Queme JL, Molina L, Melgar M (2005) Analysis of genetic similarity among 48 sugarcane varieties using microsatellite DNA sequences. Proc ISSCT 25:592–595
Rohlf FJ (1993) Ntsys-pc. Version 2.0. Applied biostatistics inc., Exeter Software, New York
Salem KFM, El-Zanaty AM, Esmail RM (2008) Assessing wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genetic diversity using morphological characters and microsatallite markers. World J Agric Sci 4(5):538–544
SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT release 9.1. SAS Inst., Cary, NC
Schut JW, Qi X, Stam P (1997) Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley. Theor Appl Genet 95:1161–1168
Selvi A, Nair NV, Balasundaram N, Mohapatra T (2003) Evaluation of maize microsatellite markers for genetic diversity analysis and fingerprinting in sugarcane. Genome 46:394–403
Semagn K (2002) Genetic relationships among ten endod types as revealed by a combination of morphological, RAPD and AFLP markers. Hereditas 137:149–156
Smith S, Luk S, Sobral B, Muhawish S, Peleman J, Zabeau M (1994) Associations among inbred lines of maize using rflp and DNA amplification technologies (AFLP and AP-PCR), and correlations with pedigree, f1 yield and heterosis. Maize Genet Newslett 68:45
Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. W. Freeman, San francisco 573 pp
Souza E, Sorrells ME (1989) Pedigree analysis of North American oat cultivars released from 1951 to 1985. Crop Sci 29:595–601
Tinker NA, Fortin MG, Mather DE (1993) Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley. Theor Appl Genet 85:976–984
Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) (2005) Directrices para la ejecución del examen de la distinción, la homogeneidad y la estabilidad tg/186/1. www.Upov.Int/es/publications/tg-rom/tg186/tg_186_1.Pdf
Vettore AL, da Silva FR, Kemper EL, Arruda P (2001) The Libraries that made SUCEST. Genet Mol Biol 24:1–7
Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, Stift G, Dryzhyruk V, Lelley T (2005) Genetic diversity in camelina germplasm as revealed by seed quality characteristics and RAPD polymorphism. Plant Breed 124:446–453
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23(21):4407–4414
Wagih ME, Musa Y, Ala A (2004) Fundamental botanical and agronomical characterization of sugarcane cultivars for clonal identification and monitoring genetic variations. Sugar Tech 6(3):127–140
Zhang MQ, Zheng XF, Yu AL, Xu JS, Zheng H (2004) Molecular marker application in sugarcane. Sugarcane Biotechnol 6(4):251–254
Acknowledgments
We thank A. D′Hont (CIRAD, France) for providing us with MSCIIR primer sequences, S. Olmos (INTA) for technical support, L. Montivero and Bjorn Welin for reviewing the manuscript English version and Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) for their generous financial support. APC is CONICET member; MFP and JR are CONICET fellows.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perera, M.F., Arias, M.E., Costilla, D. et al. Genetic diversity assessment and genotype identification in sugarcane based on DNA markers and morphological traits. Euphytica 185, 491–510 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0661-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-012-0661-9