Enhancing Fusarium crown rot resistance of durum wheat by introgressing chromosome segments from hexaploid wheat
- 252 Downloads
Compared with hexaploid wheat, tetraploid durum is more susceptible to Fusarium crown rot (FCR) infection. The feasibility of enhancing FCR resistance in durum wheat by introgressing chromosome segments of hexaploid wheat was investigated by generating and analysing a backcross population derived from a susceptible durum wheat variety ‘Bellaroi’ (recurrent parent) and a resistant hexaploid genotype ‘CSCR6’ (donor parent). Together with a few scattered segments on various chromosomes, segments of a large section of the donor chromosome 6B showed a significant effect in enhancing FCR resistance in the durum background. However, a known major locus on the donor 3BL conferring high level of resistance to FCR in hexaploid wheat failed to provide any improvement in resistance than that of the genome average once it was introduced into the durum wheat. A small proportion of the backcross population gave similar resistance to the bread wheat variety ‘Kennedy’, a level of FCR resistance acceptable to durum growers. These lines share a 4B segment from the hexaploid donor, although the segment was not among those with the largest individual effect across the whole population. These results show that it is feasible to improve FCR resistance of durum wheat by exploiting hexaploid chromosome segments, although resistance loci of the hexaploid wheat may not function properly in durum backgrounds.
KeywordsFusarium crown rot Durum wheat Gene transfer Introgression lines Quantitative trait loci
Fusarium crown rot
Controlled environmental facility
Quantitative trait loci
JM is grateful to the University of Western Australia for financial support through an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the University Postgraduate Awards, and CYZ to the Service Centre for Experts and Scholars of Hebei Province, China for a fellowship supporting her visit to CSIRO Plant Industry. We are also grateful to Drs. Evans Lagudah, Karen Aitken, Louise Thatcher and Sukumar Chakraborty for their critical reading of the manuscript.
- Burgess L (2005) Intermediate hosts and the management of crown rot and head blight. In: Annual Report of GRDC strategic initiative on crown rot, common root rot and Fusarium head blight. Grains Research and Development Corporation, Kingston, Australia, pp 34–36 Google Scholar
- Chakraborty S, Liu CJ, Mitter V, Scott JB, Akinsanmi OA, Ali S, Dill-Macky R, Nicol J, Backhouse D, Simpfendorfer S (2006) Pathogen population structure and epidemiology are keys to wheat crown rot and Fusarium head blight management. Plant Pathol 35:1–13Google Scholar
- Daniel R, Simpfendorfer S (2008) The impact of crown rot on winter cereal yields.http://www.grdc.com.au/uploads/documents/GRDC%20update%202008%20crown%20rot%20impact%20on%20yield.doc
- Miller TE (1987) Systematics and evolution. In: Lupton FHG (ed) Wheat breeding: its scientific basis. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Zheng Z, Li HB, Ma J, Chakraborty S, Faris JD, Xu SS, Liu CJ (2008) Identification of chromosomes responsible for crown rot resistance in durum wheat. In: Proceedings of 11th international wheat genetics symposium, Brisbane, 24–29 August, 2008, P132:1–4Google Scholar