Advertisement

Euphytica

, 182:239 | Cite as

Construction of an integrated microsatellite and key morphological characteristic database of potato varieties on the EU common catalogue

  • A. ReidEmail author
  • L. Hof
  • G. Felix
  • B. Rücker
  • S. Tams
  • E. Milczynska
  • D. Esselink
  • G. Uenk
  • B. Vosman
  • A. Weitz
Article

Abstract

The European Union Common Catalogue (EUCC) for potato contains over 1000 varieties. Each year member states add varieties to the list after they have undergone Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability (DUS) testing according to international guidelines. A rapid and robust method for variety identification to aid the management and maintenance of existing variety collections and for the screening of new candidate varieties would therefore be a highly useful tool for DUS testing stations. A database containing key morphological characteristics and microsatellite data was constructed for varieties on the 2006 list of the EUCC for potato. Rules for scoring SSR markers in different laboratories were established to allow a harmonized scoring of markers. Almost all varieties (99.5%) were shown to have unique molecular profiles and in pair wise comparisons 99.99% of all variety pairs could be distinguished. This clearly shows the versatility of the markers and database for identifying potato samples.

Keywords

Potato variety identification SSR Simple sequence repeat European common catalogue 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding of this project was provided by the CPVO, The Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (NL), Naktuinbouw (NL), SASA (UK), the Bundessortenamt (DE) and COBORU (PL).

References

  1. Anon (2004) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. UPOV guideline TG/23/6. http://www.upov.int/en/publications/tg_rom/tg_index.html. Accessed Aug 2010
  2. Becker SA, Steinmetz K, Weising K, Boury S, Peltier D, Renou J-P, Kahl G, Wolff K (2000) Microsatellites for cultivar identification in Pelargonium. Theor Appl Genet 101:643–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bredemeijer GMM, Cooke RJ, Ganal MW, Peeters R, Isaac P, Noordijk Y, Rendell S, Jackson J, Röder MS, Wendehake K, Dijcks M, Amelaine M, Wickaert R, Bertrand L, Vosman B (2002) Construction and testing of a microsatellite database containing more than 500 tomato varieties. Theor Appl Genet 105:1019–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooke RJ (1999) New approaches to potato variety identification. Potato Res 42:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Esselink GD, Smulders MJM, Vosman B (2003) Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theor Appl Genet 106:277–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2008) http://www.potato2008.org/en/world/index.html. Accessed Aug 2010
  7. Fulton TM, Chunwongse T, Tanksley SD (1995) Microprep protocol for extraction of DNA from tomato and other herbaceous plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 13:207–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghislain M, Spooner DM, Rodríguez F, Villamón F, Núñez J, Vásquez C, Waugh R, Bonierbale M (2004) Selection of highly informative and user-friendly microsatellites (SSRs) for genotyping of cultivated potato. Theor Appl Genet 108:881–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghislain M, Núñez J, del Rosario Herrera M, Pignataro J, Guzman F, Bonierbale M, Spooner DM (2009) Robust and highly informative microsatellite-based genetic identity kit for potato. Mol Breed 23:377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hils U, Pieterse L (2007) World catalogue of potato varieties 2007. Agrimedia, ClenzeGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutten RCB, van Berloo R (2001) An online potato pedigree database. http://www.plantbreeding.wur.nl/potatopedigree/. Accessed Aug 2010
  12. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castiglione S, Winfield MO, Sala F, Van de Wiel C, Bredemeijer G, Vosman B, Matthes M, Daly A, Brettschneider R, Bettini P, Buiatti M, Maestri E, Malcevschi A, Marmiroli N, Aert R, Volckaert G, Rueda J, Linacero R, Vazquez A, Karp A (1997) Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Mol Breed 3:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones H, Bernole A, Jensen LB, Horsnell RA, Law JR, Cooke RJ, Norris CE (2008) Minimising inter-laboratory variation when constructing a unified molecular database of plant varieties in an alloganous crop. Theor Appl Genet 117:1335–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kawchuk LM, Lynch DR, Thomas J, Penner B, Sillito D, Kulcsar F (1996) Characterization of Solanum tuberosum simple sequence repeats and application to potato cultivar identification. Am Potato J 73:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Milbourne D, Meyer RC, Collins AJ, Ramsey LD, Gebhardt C, Waugh R (1998) Isolation, characterisation and mapping of simple sequence repeat loci in potato. Mol Gen Genet 259:233–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reid A, Kerr EM (2007) A rapid SSR-based identification method for potato cultivars. Plant Genet Resour 5:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reid A, Hof L, Esselink D, Vosman B (2008) Potato cultivar genome analysis. In: Burn R (ed) Plant pathology––techniques and protocols. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Röder MS, Wendehake K, Korzun V, Bredemeijer G, Laborie D, Bertrand L, Isaac P, Rendell S, Jackson J, Cooke RJ, Vosman B, Ganal MW (2002) Construction and analysis of a microsatellite-based database of European wheat varieties. Theor Appl Genet 106:67–73PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Reid
    • 1
    Email author
  • L. Hof
    • 2
  • G. Felix
    • 1
  • B. Rücker
    • 3
  • S. Tams
    • 3
  • E. Milczynska
    • 4
  • D. Esselink
    • 5
  • G. Uenk
    • 5
  • B. Vosman
    • 5
  • A. Weitz
    • 6
  1. 1.SASAEdinburghUK
  2. 2.NaktuinbouwRoelofarendsveenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.BundessortenamtHannoverGermany
  4. 4.COBORUSłupia WielkaPoland
  5. 5.Wageningen UR Plant BreedingWageningenThe Netherlands
  6. 6.CPVOAngers Cedex 02France

Personalised recommendations