Euphytica

, Volume 185, Issue 3, pp 325–336 | Cite as

The breeding possibilities and genetic parameters of maize resistance to foliar diseases

  • Rafael Augusto Vieira
  • Carlos Alberto Scapim
  • Lia Mara Moterle
  • Dauri José Tessmann
  • Antonio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior
  • Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves
Article

Abstract

The combining ability and genetic parameters of maize grown in two different environments of diseases pressure were estimated for partial resistance to northern leaf blight (Exserohilum turcium, NLB) and gray leaf spot (Cercospora spp., GLS). Nine inbred lines were crossed in a complete diallel mating scheme including reciprocals. Two experiments were carried out to test the hybrids using randomised complete blocks design with three replications during the growing season 2008/2009. The severities of NLB and GLS were assessed under natural infestation conditions. The first experiment was the lowest NLB and GLS pressure environment, whereas the second was the highest. Data was evaluated using individual and joint Griffing’s diallel analyses. General and specific combining abilities were significant (P < 0.10) for NLB and GLS resistance under both pressures. Although additive and nonadditive gene effects were significant, the additive gene effects were more important for resistance to the diseases. The lines 1 (P83), 6 (P30F) and 7 (Pst) had the most outstanding general combining ability for NLB resistance, and the line 3 (P80) was outstanding for resistance to GLS. Based on both diseases resistance and grain yield, the synthetic composites 6 × 7 × 3 and (6 × 7) × 3 were recommended for intrapopulational breeding using recurrent selection. Three promising hybrid combinations (the 3 × 6, and 5 × 7 for resistance to NLB, and 3 × 9 for resistance to GLS) were recommended for interpopulational breeding. Resistance levels to NLB and GLS resistance were better discriminated under HP than LP conditions; however, promising lines were detected under both pressures.

Keywords

Zea mays L. General and specific combining abilities Northern leaf blight Gray leaf spot Exserohilum turcium Cercospora spp. 

References

  1. Bus VGM, Ranatunga C, Alspach P, Oraguzie N, Whitworth C (2005) A partial diallel study of powdery mildew resistance in six apple cultivars under three growing conditions with different disease pressures. Euphytica 148:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carson ML (1995) Inheritance of latent period length in maize infected with Exserohilum turcicum. Plant Dis 79:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudhary B, Mani VP (2010) Genetic analysis of resistance to Turcicum Leaf Blight in semi-temperate early maturing genotypes of maize (Zea mays). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 70:65–70Google Scholar
  4. Cruz CD (2006) Genes–versão Windows. Imprensa Universitária, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, p 642Google Scholar
  5. Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PCS (1994) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. Imprensa Universitária, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, p 480Google Scholar
  6. Derera J, Tongoonaa P, Pixley KV, Vivek B, Laing MD, van Rij NC (2008) Gene action controlling gray leaf spot resistance in Southern African maize germplasm. Crop Sci 48:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donahue PJ, Stromberg EL, Myers SL (1991) Inheritance of reaction to gray leaf spot in a diallel cross of 14 maize inbreds. Crop Sci 31:926–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elwinger GF, Johnson MW, Hill RR Jr, Ayers JE (1990) Inheritance of resistance to gray leaf spot of corn. Crop Sci 30:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gevers HO, Lake JK, Hohls T (1994) Diallel cross analysis of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize. Plant Dis 78:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldman IL (1999) Teaching recurrent selection in the classroom with Wisconsin fast plants. HortTech 9:579–584Google Scholar
  11. Gordon SG, Lipps PE, Pratt RC (1999) Heritability and components of resistance to Cercospora zeae-maydis derived from maize inbred VO613Y. Phytopathology 96:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing system. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493Google Scholar
  13. Hallauer AR, Miranda Filho JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, p 468Google Scholar
  14. Huff CA, Ayers JE, Hill RR (1988) Inheritance of resistance in corn (Zea mays) to gray leaf spot. Phytopathology 78:790–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang MS (1994) Applied quantitative genetics. MS Kang Publication, Los Angeles, California, p 157Google Scholar
  16. Luckett DJ (1989) Diallel analysis of yield components, fiber quality and bacterial blight resistance using spaced plants of cotton. Euphytica 44:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manh NQ (1977) Inheritance of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize. Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  18. Menkir A, Ayodele M (2005) Genetic analysis of resistance to gray leaf spot of midaltitude maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 45:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moterle LM (2010) Análise biométrica da qualidade da qualidade fisiológica de sementes de milho. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of Maringá, MaringáGoogle Scholar
  20. Mwanga ROM, Yencho GC, Moyer JW (2002) Diallel analysis of sweetpotato for resistance to sweet potato virus disease. Euphytica 128:237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pataky JK (1992) Relationships between yield of sweet corn and northern leaf blight caused by Exserohilum turcicum. Phytopathology 82:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sigulas KM, Hill RR, Ayers JE (1988) Genetic analysis of Exserohilum turcicum expansion on corn. Phytopathology 78:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith KL (1989) Epidemiology of gray leaf spot of field corn (Zea mays L.) caused by Cercospora zeae-maydis Tehon & Daniels. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Maryland, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson DL, Bergquist RR, Payne GA, Bowman DT, Goodman MM (1987) Inheritance of resistance to gray leaf spot in maize. Crop Sci 27:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Troyer AF (1996) Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids. Euphytica 92:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ulrich JF, Hawk JA, Carroll RB (1990) Diallel analysis of maize inbreds for resistance to gray leaf spot. Crop Sci 30:1198–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vanegas-Angaritas H, De-León C, Narro-Léon L (2007) Genetic analysis of tolerance to Cercospora ssp. in tropical maize inbred lines. Agrociencia 41:35–43Google Scholar
  28. Vieira RA (2010) Melhoramento genético da resistência à helmintosporiose comum, cercosporiose e ferrugem-polissora em milho-pipoca. Master Thesis, State University of Maringá, MaringáGoogle Scholar
  29. Vieira RA, Scapim CA, Moterle LM, Tessmann DJ, Conrado TV, Amaral Júnior AT (2009a) Dialell analysis of leaf disease resistance in inbred Brazilian popcorn cultivars. Gen Mol Res 8:1427–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vieira RA, Tessmann DJ, Scapim CA, Hata FT, Rodovalho MA, Barreto RR (2009b) Genetic resistance of new popcorn hybrids to foliar diseases. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 9:140–146Google Scholar
  31. Ward JMJ, Nowell DC (1998) Integrated management for the control of maize gray leaf spot. Integr Pest Manage Rev 3:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ward JMJ, Stromberg L, Nowell DC, Nutter FW Jr (1999) Gray leaf spot, a disease of global importance in maize production. Plant Dis 83:884–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White DG (1999) Compendium of corn diseases, 3rd edn. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, p 78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael Augusto Vieira
    • 1
  • Carlos Alberto Scapim
    • 1
  • Lia Mara Moterle
    • 1
  • Dauri José Tessmann
    • 1
  • Antonio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior
    • 2
  • Leandro Simões Azeredo Gonçalves
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUEM—Universidade Estadual de MaringáMaringáBrazil
  2. 2.Plant Breeding LaboratoryUENF—Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil

Personalised recommendations