, Volume 181, Issue 2, pp 237–251 | Cite as

Genetic diversity, structure and fruit trait associations in Greek sweet cherry cultivars using microsatellite based (SSR/ISSR) and morpho-physiological markers

  • Ioannis V. Ganopoulos
  • Konstantinos Kazantzis
  • Ioannis Chatzicharisis
  • Irene Karayiannis
  • Athanasios S. TsaftarisEmail author


It is important to couple phenotypic analysis with genetic diversity for germplasm conservation in gene bank collections. The use of molecular markers supports the study of genetic marker-trait associations of biological and agronomic interest on diverse genetic material. In this report, 19 Greek traditional sweet cherry cultivars and two international cultivars, which were used as controls, were grown in Greece and characterized for 17 morpho-physiological traits, 15 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci and 10 inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. To our knowledge, this is the first report on molecular genetic diversity studies in sweet cherry in Greece. Principal component analysis (PCA) of nine qualitative and eight quantitative morphological parameters explain over 77.33% of total variability in the first five axes. The SSR markers yielded a combined matching probability ratio (MPR) of 9.569 × e−12. The 15 SSR loci produced a total of 92 alleles. Ten ISSR primers generated 91 bands, with an average of 9.1 bands per primer. Expected heterozygosity (gene diversity) values of 15 SSR loci and 10 ISSR markers averaged at 0.683 and 0.369, respectively. Based on stepwise multiple regression analysis (MRA), SSR alleles were found associated with harvest time and fruit polar diameter. Furthermore, three ISSR markers were correlated with fruit harvest and soluble solids and four ISSR markers were correlated with fruit skin color. Stepwise MRA identified six SSR alleles associated with harvest time with a high correlation (P < 0.001), with linear associations with high F values. Hence, data analyzed by the use of MRA could be useful in marker-assisted breeding programs when no other genetic information is available.


Sweet cherry SSR/ISSR MRA Fruit association markers Morpho-physiological traits 



Simple sequence repeat


Inter simple sequence repeat


Amplified fragment length polymorphism


Random amplified polymorphic DNA


Multiple regression analysis


Matching probability ratio


Principal component analysis


Polymerase chain reaction


Quantitative trait locus



Deep thanks are due to Dr. Panagiotis Madesis and Dr. Georgios Merkouropoulos, Institute of Agrobiotechnology, for their suggestions and improvements. We also acknowledged the comments made by anonymous reviewers since the comments critically improved the manuscript. Help with statistical analysis of Mrs. Maria Ganopoulou and Pinelopi Vasiliou is greatly acknowledged. Continuous support of the Institute of Agrobiotechnology/CERTH from the General Secretariat of Research and Technology of Greece is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

10681_2011_416_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (79 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 79 kb)


  1. Affifi AA, Clark V (1984) Computer-aided multivariate analysis. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Amurrio JM, Deron AM, Zeven AC (1995) Numerical taxonomy of Iberian pea landraces based on quantitative and qualitative characters. Euphytica 82:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnau G, Lallemand J, Bourgoin M (2003) Fast and reliable strawberry cultivar identification using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification. Euphytica 129:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldoni L, Tosti N, Ricciolini C, Belaj A, Arcioni S, Pannelli G, Germana MA, Mulas M, Porceddu A (2006) Genetic structure of wild and cultivated olives in the central Mediterranean basin. Ann Bot 98:935–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatt GM (1970) Multivariate analysis approach to selection of parents for hybridization aiming at yield improvement in self-pollinated crops. Aust J Agric Res 21:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Breseghello F, Sorrells ME (2006) Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172:1165–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatterjee SN, Nagaraja GM, Srivastava PP, Naik G (2004) Morphological and molecular variation of Morus laevigata in India. Genetica 121:133–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke JB, Tobutt KR (2003) Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites from Prunus avium ‘Napoleon’. Mol Ecol Notes 3:578–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarke JB, Sargent DJ, Boskovic RI, Belaj A, Tobutt KR (2009) A cherry map from the inter-specific cross Prunus avium ‘Napoleon’ × P. nipponica based on microsatellite, gene-specific and isoenzyme markers. Tree Genet Genomes 5:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeNise S, Johnston E, Halverson J, Marshall K, Rosenfeld D, McKenna S, Sharp T, Edwards J (2004) Power of exclusion for parentage verification and probability of match for identity in American kennel club breeds using 17 canine microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 35:14–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dirlewanger E, Cosson P, Tavaud M, Aranzana J, Poizat C, Zanetto A, Arus P, Laigret F (2002) Development of microsatellite markers in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and their use in genetic diversity analysis in peach and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L). Theor Appl Genet 105:127–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Downey SL, Iezzoni AF (2000) Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 125:76–80Google Scholar
  14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  15. Gerlach HK, Stosser R (1997) Patterns of random amplified polymorphic DNAs for sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivar identification. J Appl Bot Angew Bot 71:212–218Google Scholar
  16. Goulao L, Oliveira CM (2001) Molecular characterisation of cultivars of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) using microsatellite (SSR and ISSR) markers. Euphytica 122:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gulsen O, Roose ML (2001) Lemons: diversity and relationships with selected citrus genotypes as measured with nuclear genome markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:309–317Google Scholar
  18. Hampl V, Pavlicek A, Flegr J (2001) Construction and bootstrap analysis of DNA fingerprinting-based phylogenetic trees with the freeware program FreeTree: application to trichomonad parasites. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:731–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedrick UP (1915) The cherries of New York. J B Lyon, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  20. IPGRI (1985) Cherry descriptors. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  21. Joshi SP, Gupta VS, Aggarwal RK, Ranjekar PK, Brar DS (2000) Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship as revealed by inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism in the genus Oryza. Theor Appl Genet 100:1311–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kar PK, Srivastava PP, Awasthi AK, Urs SR (2008) Genetic variability and association of ISSR markers with some biochemical traits in mulberry (Morus spp.) genetic resources available in India. Tree Genet Genomes 4:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koukourojiannis V (1996) Οι τάσεις στην παραγωγή και εμπορία των κερασιών. Γεωργία-Κτηνοτροφία 2:24–31 (Greek)Google Scholar
  24. Lewontin RC (1972) The apportionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 6:381–398Google Scholar
  25. Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Noli E, Tuberosa R (2005) Population structure and long-range linkage disequilibrium in a durum wheat elite collection. Mol Breed 15:271–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marchese A, Tobutt KR, Raimondo A, Motisi A, Boskovic RI, Clarke J, Caruso T (2007) Morphological characteristics, microsatellite fingerprinting and determination of incompatibility genotypes of Sicilian sweet cherry cultivars. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 82:41–48Google Scholar
  28. Marinoni D, Akkak A, Bounous G, Edwards KJ, Botta R (2003) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Castanea sativa (Mill). Mol Breed 11:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marshall RE (1954) Cherries and cherry products. In: Economic crops, vol 5. Inter-science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 70:3321–3323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nei M, Li W (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273Google Scholar
  33. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pakniyat H, Powell W, Baird E, Handley LL, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Nevo E, Hackett CA, Caligari PDS, Forster BP (1997) AFLP variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch) with reference to salt tolerance and associated ecogeography. Genome 40:332–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parker HG, Kim LV, Sutter NB, Carlson S, Lorentzen TD, Malek TB, Johnson GS, DeFrance HB, Ostrander EA, Kruglyak L (2004) Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 304:1160–1164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, Rafalski A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ (1999) A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenberg NA, Pritchard JK, Weber JL, Cann HM, Kidd KK, Zhivotovsky LA, Feldman MW (2002) Genetic structure of human populations. Science 298:2381–2385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roy SN, Bargmann RE (1957) Tests of multiple independence and the associated confidence-bounds. North Carolina Institute of Statistics Mimeograph Series No. 175Google Scholar
  41. Ruan C (2010) Germplasm-regression-combined marker-trait association identification in plants. Afr J Biotechnol 9:573–580Google Scholar
  42. Ruan CJ, Li H, Mopper S (2009) Characterization and identification of ISSR markers associated with resistance to dried-shrink disease in sea buckthorn. Mol Breed 24:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schueler S, Tusch A, Schuster M, Ziegenhagen B (2003) Characterization of microsatellites in wild and sweet cherry (Prunus avium L)—markers for individual identification and reproductive processes. Genome 46:95–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Struss D, Boritzki M, Karle R, Iezzoni AF (2002) Microsatellite markers differentiate eight Giessen cherry rootstocks. HortScience 37:191–193Google Scholar
  45. Struss D, Ahmad R, Southwick SM, Boritzki M (2003) Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:904–909Google Scholar
  46. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Testolin R, Marrazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I, Dettori MT, Pancaldi M, Sansavini S (2000) Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43:512–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. UPOV (1976) Guidelines for the conduct of test for distinctness, homogenity and stability of the cherry. International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, GenovaGoogle Scholar
  49. Vaughan SP, Russell K (2004) Characterization of novel microsatellites and development of multiplex PCR for large-scale population studies in wild cherry, Prunus avium. Mol Ecol Notes 4:429–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vijayan K, Srivatsava PP, Nair CV, Awasthi AK, Tikader A, Sreenivasa B, Urs SR (2006) Molecular characterization and identification of markers associated with yield traits in mulberry using ISSR markers. Plant Breed 125:298–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Pooni HS, Clemeno TP, Newbury HJ (1996) Predicting quantitative variation within rice germplasm using molecular markers. Heredity 76:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Webster AD (1996) The taxonomic classification of sweet and sour cherries and a brief history of their cultivation. In: Webster AD, Looney NE (eds) Cherries. Cab International, Wallingford, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  53. Wolfe AD (2005) ISSR techniques for evolutionary biology. Mol Evol Prod Biochem Data B 395:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Eugenics 15:323–354Google Scholar
  55. Wunsch A, Hormaza JI (2002) Molecular characterisation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L) Batsch] SSR sequences. Heredity 89:56–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wunsch A, Hormaza JI (2004) Cloning and characterization of genomic DNA sequences of four self-incompatibility alleles in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L). Theor Appl Genet 108:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yeh FC, Boyle TJB (1997) Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg J Bot 129:157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis V. Ganopoulos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Kazantzis
    • 3
  • Ioannis Chatzicharisis
    • 3
  • Irene Karayiannis
    • 3
  • Athanasios S. Tsaftaris
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Institute of Agrobiotechnology (IN.A.)Center for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH)ThermiGreece
  3. 3.Pomology InstituteNAGREFImathiaGreece

Personalised recommendations