Euphytica

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 39–52

Genetic variation and environmental stability of grain mineral nutrient concentrations in Triticum dicoccoides under five environments

  • Hugo Ferney Gomez-Becerra
  • Atilla Yazici
  • Levent Ozturk
  • Hikmet Budak
  • Zvi Peleg
  • Alexey Morgounov
  • Tzion Fahima
  • Yehoshua Saranga
  • Ismail Cakmak
Article

Abstract

Nineteen wild emmer wheat [Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides (Körn.) Thell.] genotypes were evaluated for the grain concentrations of phosphorous (P), potassium (K), sulfur (S), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe) and cooper (Cu) under five different environments in Turkey and Israel. Each mineral nutrient has been investigated for the (1) genotype by environment (G × E) interactions, (2) genotype stability, (3) correlation among minerals and (4) mineral stability. Among the macronutrients analyzed, grain concentrations of Ca (range 338–2,034 mg kg−1) and S (range 0.18–0.43%) showed the largest variation. In the case of micronutrients, the largest variation was observed in the grain Mn concentration (range 13–87 mg kg−1). Grain concentrations of Fe and Zn also showed important variation (range 27–86 and 39–115 mg kg−1, respectively). Accessions with higher nutrient concentrations (especially Zn and Fe) had also greater grain weight, suggesting that higher grain Zn and Fe concentrations are not necessarily related to small grain size or weight. Analysis of variance showed that environment was the most important source of variation for K, S, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn, explaining between 44 and 78% of the total variation and G × E explained between 20 and 40% of the total variation in all the minerals, except for S and Zn where its effect accounted for less than 16%. Genotype was the most important source of variation for Cu (explaining 38% of the total variation). However, genotype effect was also important for Mg, Mn, Zn and S. Sulfur and Zn showed the largest heritability values (77 and 72%, respectively). Iron exhibited low heritability and high ratio value between the G × E and genotype variance components \( \left( {\sigma_{\text{GE}}^{2} /\sigma_{G}^{2} } \right) \), suggesting that specific adaptation for this mineral could be positively exploited. The wild emmer germplasm tested in the current study revealed some outstanding accessions (such as MM 5/4 and 24-39) in terms of grain Zn and Fe concentrations and environmental stability that can be used as potential donors to enhance grain micronutrient concentrations in wheats.

Keywords

Genotype × environment interaction Grain quality Micronutrients Plant breeding Mineral stability Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccoides 

References

  1. Atlin GN, Baker RJ, McRae KB, Lu X (2000) Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci 40:7–13Google Scholar
  2. Balint AF, Kovacs G, Erdei L, Sutka J (2001) Comparison of the Cu, Zn, Fe, Ca and Mg contents of the grains of wild, ancient and cultivated wheat species. Cereal Res Commun 29:375–382Google Scholar
  3. Bänzinger M, Long J (2000) The potential for increasing the iron and zinc density of maize through plant breeding. Food Nutr Bull 21:397–400Google Scholar
  4. Black RE, Lindsay HA, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onnis M, Ezzati M, Mathers C, Rivera J (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371:243–260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonfil DJ, Kafkafi U (2000) Wild wheat adaptation in different soil ecosystems as expressed in the mineral concentration of the seeds. Euphytica 114:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouis HE (2003) Micronutrient fortification of plants through plant breeding: can it improve nutrition in man at low cost? Proc Nutr Soc 62:403–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cakmak I (2000) Role of zinc in protecting plant cells from reactive oxygen species. New Phytol 146:185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cakmak I (2008) Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 302:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cakmak I, Tolay I, Ozdemir A, Ozkan H, Kling CI (1999) Differences in zinc efficiency among and within diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid wheats. Ann Bot 84:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cakmak I, Ozkan H, Braun HJ, Welch RM, Romheld V (2000) Zinc and iron concentrations in seeds of wild, primitive and modern wheats. Food Nutr Bull 21:401–403Google Scholar
  11. Cakmak I, Torun A, Millet E, Feldman M, Fahima T, Korol A, Nevo E, Braun HJ, Ozkan H (2004) Triticum dicoccoides: an important genetic resource for increasing zinc and iron concentration in modern cultivated wheat. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 50:1047–1054Google Scholar
  12. Cashman KD (2002) Calcium intake calcium bioavailability and bone health. Br J Nutr 87:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Distelfeld A, Cakmak I, Peleg Z, Ozturk L, Yazici AM, Budak H, Saranga Y, Fahima T (2007) Multiple QTL-effects of wheat Gpc-B1 locus on grain protein and micronutrient concentrations. Physiol Plant 129:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman M (2001) The origin of cultivated wheat. In: Bonjean AP, Angus WJ (eds) The world wheat book. Lavoisier Tech & Doc, Paris, pp 3–56Google Scholar
  15. Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14:742–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gauch HG (1990) Full and reduced models for yield trials. Theor Appl Genet 80:153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauch HG (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials: AMMI analysis of factorial designs. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Gauch HG Jr, Zobel RW (1996) AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 85–122Google Scholar
  19. Haydon MJ, Cobbett CS (2007) Transporters of ligands for essential metal ions in plants. New Phytol 174:499–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. House WA, Van Campen DR, Welch RM (1996) Influence of dietary sulfur-containing amino acids on the bioavailability to rats of zinc in corn kernels. Nutr Res 16:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalayci M, Torun B, Eker S, Aydin M, Ozturk L, Cakmak I (1999) Grain yield, zinc efficiency and zinc concentration of wheat cultivars grown in a zinc-deficient calcareous soil in field and greenhouse. Field Crops Res 63:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd edn. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. McDonald GK, Genc Y, Graham RD (2008) A simple method to evaluate genetic variation in grain zinc concentration by correcting for differences in grain yield. Plant Soil 306:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller GD, Jarvis JK, McBean LD (2001) The importance of meeting calcium needs with foods. J Am Coll Nutr 20:168–185Google Scholar
  25. Milligan SB, Balzarini M, White WH (2003) Broad-sense heritabilities, genetic correlations, and selection indices for sugarcane borer resistance and their relation to yield loss. Crop Sci 43:1729–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morgonuov A, Gómez-Becerra HF, Abugalieva A, Dzhunusova M, Yessimbekova M, Muminjanov H, Zelenskiy Y, Ozturk L, Cakmak I (2007) Iron and zinc grain density in common wheat grown in Central Asia. Euphytica 155:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy KM, Reeves PG, Jones SS (2008) Relationship between yield and mineral nutrient concentrations in historical and modern spring wheat cultivars. Euphytica 163:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nevo E, Korol AB, Beiles A, Fahima T (2002) Evolution of Wild Emmer and wheat improvement: population genetics, genetic resources, and genome organization of wheat’s progenitor, Triticum dicoccoides. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Oikeh SO, Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, Welch R, Glahn RP (2003a) Genotypic differences in concentration and bioavailability of kernel-iron in tropical maize genotypes grown under field conditions. J Plant Nutr 26:2307–2319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oikeh SO, Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, Welch R, Glahn RP (2003b) Assessment of concentrations of iron and zinc and bioavailable iron in grains of early-maturing tropical maize genotypes. J Agric Food Chem 51:3688–3694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Oikeh SO, Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, Welch R, Glahn RP, Gauch G Jr (2004) Environmental stability of iron and zinc concentrations in grain of elite early-maturing tropical maize genotypes grown under field conditions. J Agric Sci 142:543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortiz-Monasterio I, Graham RD (2000) Breeding for trace minerals in wheat. Food Nutr Bull 21:392–396Google Scholar
  33. Oury F-X, Leenhardt F, Rémésy C, Chanliaud E, Duperrier B, Balfourier F, Charmet G (2006) Genetic variability and stability of grain magnesium, zinc and iron concentrations in bread wheat. Eur J Agron 25:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozturk L, Yazici MA, Yucel C, Torun A, Cekic C, Bagci A, Ozkan H, Braun H-J, Sayers Z, Cakmak I (2006) Concentration and localization of zinc during seed development and germination in wheat. Physiol Plant 128:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peleg Z, Saranga Y, Yazici A, Fahima T, Ozturk L, Cakmak I (2008) Grain zinc, iron and protein concentrations and zinc-efficiency in wild emmer wheat under contrasting irrigation regimes. Plant Soil 306:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson CJ, Johnson VA, Mattern PJ (1986) Influence of cultivar and environment on mineral and protein concentrations of wheat flour, bran, and grain. Cereal Chem 63:183–186Google Scholar
  37. Rengel Z, Batten GD, Crowley DE (1999) Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crops Res 60:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi R, Li H, Tong Y, Jing R, Zhang F, Zou C (2008) Identification of quantitative trait locus of zinc and phosphorus density in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain. Plant Soil 306:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silver NC, Dunlap WP (1987) Averaging correlation coefficients: should Fisher’s z transformation be used? J Appl Psychol 72:146–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Steadman KJ, Burgoon MS, Lewis BA, Edwardson SE, Obendorf RL (2001) Buckwheat seed milling fractions: description, macronutrient composition, and dietary fiber. J Cereal Sci 33:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi M, Terada Y, Nakai I, Nakanishi H, Yoshimura E, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2003) Role of nicotianamine in the intracellular delivery of metals and plant reproductive development. Plant Cell 15:1263–1280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wangemann M, Selzer A, Leitzmann C, Golf S, Graef V, Katz N (1995) Recommendations on the dietary allowance of magnesium. Magnes Bull 17:79–85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Ferney Gomez-Becerra
    • 1
  • Atilla Yazici
    • 1
  • Levent Ozturk
    • 1
  • Hikmet Budak
    • 1
  • Zvi Peleg
    • 2
  • Alexey Morgounov
    • 3
  • Tzion Fahima
    • 4
  • Yehoshua Saranga
    • 2
  • Ismail Cakmak
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesSabanci UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Science and Genetics in AgricultureThe Hebrew University of JerusalemRehovotIsrael
  3. 3.CIMMYTAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, The Institute of Evolution, Faculty of Science and Science EducationUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations