, Volume 168, Issue 3, pp 379–384 | Cite as

The use of Vp1 in real time RT-PCR to select for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in triticale

  • Sarah De Laethauwer
  • Dirk Reheul
  • Jan De Riek
  • Geert Haesaert


In spite of the availability of laboratory and field tests there is still a major problem to select pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) tolerant triticale varieties in a reliable, field-independent way. One approach to minimize the influence of environmental conditions and physio-morphological traits on PHS detection is using molecular genetic tools. The ‘viviparous’ Vp1 gene has been repeatedly described to play an important role in dormancy in wheat. A quantitative RT-PCR assay based on the expression of the Vp1 gene has been developed. Specific primers were designed for detecting Vp1 in both wheat and triticale. The expression levels of Vp1 were normalized using reference genes and relatively quantified with the comparative Ct-method. However, the first results indicate that the achieved Vp1 expression levels at 50 days post anthesis are not useful to select for PHS tolerance, both in wheat and triticale. This negative outcome so far is possibly due to the existence of several splicing events or to the late assaying moment in the kernel development, when Vp1 expression is found to be low.


Triticale Wheat Vp1 gene Real time RT-PCR Pre-harvest sprouting 



S. De Laethauwer is financially supported by the research funding of the University College Ghent. We are very grateful to the Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research—Unit Plant for their technical assistance and expertise. We would like also to thank Dr. Zofia Banaszak (Danko, Poland), Jorion et fils, Florimond Desprez, Dr. Kath Cooper and Prof. Daryl Mares for providing seed samples of triticale, wheat and rye.


  1. De Laethauwer S, Messens K, Derycke V et al (2007) An approach to developing a marker assisted selection system for tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in Triticale. In: Proceedings of 6th International Triticale Symposium, South Africa, pp 39–44Google Scholar
  2. Derycke V, Haesaert G, Latré J et al (2002) Relation between laboratory sprouting resistance tests and field observations in triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) genotypes. In: Proceedings of 5th International Triticale Symposium, Poland, vol 1, pp 123–133Google Scholar
  3. Flintham JE, Gale MD (1982) The Tom Thumb dwarfing gene Rht3 in wheat. I. Reduced pre-harvest damage to breadmaking quality. TAG 62:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Flintham JE, Gale MD (1983) The Tom Thumb dwarfing gene Rht3 in wheat. II. Effects on height, yield and grain quality. TAG 66:249–256Google Scholar
  5. Groos C, Gay G, Perretant M-R et al (2002) Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain color by quantitative trati loci analysis in a white X red grain bread-wheat cross. TAG 104:39–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haesaert G, De Baets A (1996) Preharvest sprouting resistance in Triticale: preliminary results. In: Guedes-Pinto H, Darvey N, Carnide VP (eds) Triticale: today and tomorrow. Kluwer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. Hattori T, Terada T, Hamasuna ST (1994) Sequence and functional analyses of the rice gene homologous to the maize Vp1. Plant Mol Biol 24:805–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A et al (2007) qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8:R19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoecker U, Vasil IK, McCarty DR (1995) Integrated control of seed maturation and germination programs by activator and repressor functions of Viviparous-1 of maize. Genes Dev 9:2459–2469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jestin L, Bonhomme H (1996) Genetic variation, G * E interactions and selection response for Hagberg falling number in Triticale. In: Guedes-Pinto H, Darvey N, Carnide VP (eds) Triticale: today and tomorrow. Kluwer, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones HD, Peters NCB, Holdsworth MJ (1997) Genotype and environment interact to control dormancy and differential expression of the VIVIPAROUS1 homologue in embryos of Avena fatua. Plant J 12:911–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luerssen H, Kirik V, Herrmann P et al (1998) FUSCA3 encodes a protein with a conserved VP1/ABI3-like B3 domain which is of functional importance for the regulation of seed maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 15:755–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mares D, Mrva K (2001) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with variation in grain dormancy in Australian wheat. Aust J Agric Res 52:1257–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mares D, Oettler G (1991) α-Amylase activity in developing Triticale grains. J Cereal Sci 13:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mares D, Mrva K, Tan M et al (2002) Dormancy in white-grained wheat: progress towards identification of genes and molecular markers. Euphytica 126:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarty DR, Hattori T, Carson CB et al (1991) The viviparous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator. Cell 66:895–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKibbin R, Wilkinson M, Bailey P et al (2002) Transcripts of VP-1 homologues are misspliced in modern wheat and ancestral species. Plant Biol 99:10203–10208Google Scholar
  18. Nakamura S, Toyama T (2001) Isolation of a VP1 homologue from wheat and analysis of its expression in embryos of dormant and non-dormant cultivars. J Exp Bot 52:875–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osa M, Kato K, Mori M et al (2003) Mapping QTLs for seed dormancy and the Vp1 homologue on chromosome 3A in wheat. TAG 106:1491–1496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Paterson AH, Sorrells ME, Obendorf RL (1989) Methods of evaluation for preharvest sprouting resistance in wheat breeding programs. Can J Plant Sci 69:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rybka K and Redziak A (2002) An approach to mapping of Polish winter triticale pre-harvest sprouting resistance loci. In: Proceedings of 5th International Triticale Symposium, Poland, vol 2, pp 213–217Google Scholar
  22. Stone SL, Kwong LW, Yee KM et al (2001) LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. PNAS 98:11806–11811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Suzuki M, Wang HHY, McCarty DR (2007) Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 regulatory network in plant embryo development by VP1/ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 3-LIKE B3 genes. Plant Physiol 143:902–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F et al (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3:research0034Google Scholar
  25. Wilkinson M, Lenton JR, Holdsworth M (2005) Transcripts of Vp-1 homoeologues are alternatively spliced within the Triticeae tribe. Euphytica 143:243–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson I, Barker G, Lu C et al (2005) Alteration of the embryo transcriptome of hexaploid winter wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Mercia) during maturation and germination. Funct Integr Genomics 5:144–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Y, Ma YZ, Xu ZS et al (2007) Isolation and characterization of Viviparous-1 genes in wheat cultivars with distinct ABA sensitivity and pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:2863–2871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah De Laethauwer
    • 1
  • Dirk Reheul
    • 2
  • Jan De Riek
    • 3
  • Geert Haesaert
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Biosciences and Landscape ArchitectureUniversity College Ghent and University GhentGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research, Plant UnitMelleBelgium

Personalised recommendations