, Volume 172, Issue 1, pp 139–148 | Cite as

Measurement of the field response of Musa genotypes to Radopholus Similis and Helicotylenchus Multicinctus and the implications for nematode resistance breeding

  • J. B. Hartman
  • D. Vuylsteke
  • P. R. Speijer
  • F. Ssango
  • D. L. Coyne
  • D. De Waele


Crop growth and damage parameters (plant growth and yield, root damage and nematode population densities), believed to be associated with resistance of Musa genotypes to nematodes under field conditions, were evaluated in a field trial of 24 Musa genotypes inoculated at planting with a combination of Radopholus similis and Helicotylenchus multicinctus with the objective to identify parameters with strong association with nematode resistance and high heritability. Correlation and path analysis of the association between plant growth, yield, root damage and nematode population densities showed a strong negative association between percentage dead roots, percentage root necrosis, R. similis and H. multicinctus population densities and yield. The strongest negative association was observed between percentage dead roots and yield. Broad-sense genotype heritability estimates demonstrated that heritability estimates for percentage dead roots, number of large lesions and nematode population density were most affected by inoculation with nematodes. These results indicate therefore that effective selection for nematode resistance under field conditions could be obtained by using an index, that includes percentage dead roots, the number of large lesions, and nematode population density.


Banana Field screening Path analysis Plant parasitic nematodes Plantain Yield 



This publication is dedicated to the memory of John Hartman, Dirk Vuylsteke and Paul Speijer who died tragically in an air crash on January 30, 2000. The assistance of Jim Lorenzon, IITA banana breeder, in preparing this manuscript is greatly appreciated.


  1. Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WAGoogle Scholar
  2. Board JE, Kang MS, Harville BG (1997) Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late-planted soybean. Crop Sci 37:879–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davide RG (1996) Overview of nematodes as a limiting factor in Musa production. In: Frison EA, Horry J-P, De Waele D (eds) New frontiers in resistance breeding for nematode, fusarium, and sigatoka. Proceedings of a workshop Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2–5 October, 1995. INIBAP, Montpellier, France pp 27–31Google Scholar
  4. De Schutter B, Speijer PR, Dochez C, Tenkouano A, De Waele D (2001) Evaluating host plant reaction of Musa germplasm to Radopholus similis by inoculation of single primary roots. Nematropica 31:297–301Google Scholar
  5. De Waele D, Elsen A (2002) Migratory endoparasities: Pratylenchus and Radopholus species. In: Starr JJ, Cook R, Bridge J (eds) Plant resistance to parasitic nematodes. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 175–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dochez C, Whyte J, Tenkouano A, Ortiz R, De Waele D (2005) Response of East African highland bananas and hybrids to Radopholus similis. Nematology 7:655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dochez C, Speijer PR, De Schutter B, Dubois T, Tenkouano A, De Waele D, Ortiz R (2009) Host plant resistance and tolerance of Musa landraces and hybrids to nematode infestation. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop Suppl 92:137–153Google Scholar
  8. Elsen A, Goossens B, Belpaire B, Neyens A, Speijer PR, De Waele D (2004) Recolonisation by nematodes of hot water treated cooking banana planting material in Uganda. Nematology 6:215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fogain R, Gowen S (1995) Susceptibility to Radopholus similis among triploid Musa cultivars in relation to growth of root systems. Nematologica 41:300–308Google Scholar
  10. Gowen SC, Quénéhervé P, Fogain R (2005) Nematode parasites of bananas and plantains. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J (eds) Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 611–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauser S (2000) Effects of fertilizer and hot-water treatment upon establishment. Survival and yield of plantain (Musa spp., AAB French). Field Crop Res 66:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hooper DJ, Hallman J, Subbotin S (2005) Methods for extraction, processing and detection of plant and soil nematodes. Nematode parasites of bananas and plantains. In: Luc M, Sikora RA, Bridge J (eds) Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agriculture, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 53–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jagtap S (1993) Diagnostic survey site selection using GIS for effective biological and integrated control of highland banana pests. In: Gold CS, Gemmel B (eds) Biological and integrated control of highland banana pests and diseases in Africa. Proceedings of a Research Coordination Meeting 12–14 November 1991, IITA, Cotonou, Benin. The Printer, Davis, CA, USA, pp 25–36Google Scholar
  14. Kashaija IN, Speijer PR, Gold CS, Gowen SR (1994) Occurrence, distribution and abundance of plant parasitic nematodes on bananas in Uganda. Afr J Crop Sci 2:99–104Google Scholar
  15. McGiffen ME, Pantone DJ, Masiunas JB (1994) Path analysis of tomato yield components in relation to competition with black and eastern black nightshade. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:6–11Google Scholar
  16. Ortiz R (1998) AMMI and stability analyses of bunch mass in multilocational testing of Musa germplasm in sub-Saharan Africa. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:623–627Google Scholar
  17. Pinochet J (1996) Review of past research on Musa germplasm and nematode interactions. In: New frontiers in resistance breeding for nematode, fusarium, and sigatoka Proceedings of a workshop Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2–5 October, 1995. INIBAP, Montpellier, France, pp 32–44Google Scholar
  18. Pinochet J, Rowe PR (1979) Progress in breeding for resistance to Radopholus similis on bananas. Nematropica 9:76–77Google Scholar
  19. Price NS (1994) Field trial evaluation of nematode susceptibility within Musa. Fundam Appl Nematol 17:391–396Google Scholar
  20. Quénéhervé P, Valette C, Topart P, Tezenas du Montcel H, Salmon F (2009) Nematode resistance in bananas: screening results on some wild and cultivated accessions of Musa spp. Euphytica 165:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sachs L (1986) Applied statistics—a handbook of techniques. Springer-Verlag, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarah JL (1989) Banana nematodes and their control in Africa. Nematropica 19:199–216Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute (1996) The SAS system for Windows release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Sasser JN, Freckman DW (1987) A world perspective on nematology: the role of the society. In: Veech JA, Dickson DW (eds) Vistas in nematology. Society of Nematologists, Hyattsville, MD, USA, pp 7–14Google Scholar
  25. Severn-Ellis AA, Daneel M, de Jager K, De Waele D (2003) Development of an aeroponic system to study the response of banana roots to infection with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense and Radopholus simlis. InfoMusa 12:22–24Google Scholar
  26. Simmonds NW (1995) Bananas: Musa (Musaceae). In: Smart J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, UK, pp 370–375Google Scholar
  27. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practices of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman and Co., New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Speijer PR, De Waele D (1997) Screening of Musa germplasm for resistance and tolerance to nematodes. INIBAP Technical Guidelines I. INIBAP, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  29. Speijer PR, Fogain R (1999) Musa and Ensete nematode pest status in Africa. In: Karamura EB, Gold CS (eds) Banana IPM. Proceedings of the workshop, Nelspruit, South Africa, 23–26 November, 1998. INIBAP, Montpellier, France pp 99–118Google Scholar
  30. Speijer PR, Gold CS, Kashaija IN, Karamura EB (1994) Assessment of nematode damage in East African highland banana systems. In: Valmayor RV, Davide RG, Stanton JM, Treverrow NL, Roa VN (eds) Banana nematodes and weevil borers in Asia and the pacific. Proceedings of the workshop Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia 18–22 April, 1994. INIBAP/ASPNET, Los Banos, Philippines, pp 191–203Google Scholar
  31. Speijer PR, Kajumba C, Ssango F (1999) East African highland banana production as influenced by nematodes and crop management in Uganda. Int J Pest Manag 45:41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Speijer PR, Gold CS, Goossens B, Karamura EB, Elsen A, De Waele D (2000a) Rate of nematode infestation of clean banana planting material (Musa spp. AAA) in Uganda. Acta Hortic 540:461–467Google Scholar
  33. Speijer PR, Ssango F, Vuylsteke D (2000b). Evaluation of host plant response to nematodes in Musa germplasm in Uganda. In: Craenen K, Ortiz R, Karamura BE, Vuylsteke DR (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on banana and plantain for Africa, Kampala, Uganda, 14–18 October 1996. Acta Hortic 540:225–232Google Scholar
  34. Ssango F, Speijer PR, Coyne DL, De Waele D (2004) Path analysis: a novel approach to determine the contribution of nematode damage to East African Highland banana (Musa spp., AAA) yield loss under two crop management practices in Uganda. Field Crop Res 90:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swennen R, Vuylsteke D (2001) Banana. In: Raemaekers RH (ed) Crop production in tropical Africa. Directorate General for International Co-operation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, External Trade and International Co-operation, Brussels, Belgium, pp 530–552Google Scholar
  36. Tenkouano A, Swennen RL (2004) Progress in breeding and delivering improved plantain and banana to African farmers. Chron Horticult 44:9–15Google Scholar
  37. Timm NH, Mieczkowski TA (1997) Univariate and multivariate general linear models: theory and applications using SAS® software. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  38. Vuylsteke D (2000) Breeding bananas and plantains: from intractability to feasibility. In: Craenen K, Ortiz R, Karamura BE, Vuylsteke DR (eds) Proceedings of the first international conference on banana and plantain for Africa, Kampala, Uganda, 14–18 October 1996. Acta Horticult 540:149–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. B. Hartman
    • 1
  • D. Vuylsteke
    • 1
  • P. R. Speijer
    • 1
  • F. Ssango
    • 1
  • D. L. Coyne
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. De Waele
    • 2
  1. 1.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)IbadanNigeria
  2. 2.Laboratory of Tropical Crop ImprovementCatholic University of Leuven (K. U. Leuven)LeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.CroydonUK

Personalised recommendations