Euphytica

, Volume 166, Issue 1, pp 83–94 | Cite as

Description of a new trans-generic Skb-RNase allele in apple

  • Kamila Bokszczanin
  • Andrzej Palucha
  • Andrzej A. Przybyla
Article

Abstract

Polish apple cvs: ‘Ligol’, ‘Odra’ and ‘Primula’ served for studies of self-incompatibility. Basing on available sequence data, a new set of primers upstream and downstream of the hypervariable (HV) region of apple S-RNases were designed. Using the RT-PCR method, cDNA was amplified on RNA isolated from styles. PCR products were cloned and sequenced. A new trans-generic S-RNase allele, designated as Skb (GenBank accession no. EU443101), was discovered in cvs ‘Odra’ and ‘Primula’. Nucleotide sequence alignment revealed that Skb-RNase shows 98% identity to SaucS19-RNase from Sorbus aucuparia and 97% identity to CmonS17-RNase from Crataegus monogyna. The occurrence of extensive intergeneric hybridization among extant Pyrinae is considered since the deduced amino acid sequence of Skb-RNase from M. × domestica showed higher similarity to CmonS17 from C. monogyna, SaucS19-RNase from S. aucuparia, St from Malus transitoria, S5-RNase and S3-RNase from Pyrus pyrifolia, and S40-RNase from P. ussuriensis than to S-alleles from Malus × domestica and all of them are grouped in the same cluster of phylogenetic tree. In respect to extremely high similarities between aforementioned S-RNases it could be possible that these alleles existed before the separation of Malus, Pyrus, Sorbus and Crataegus genera. Within Malus, the Skb-RNase from M. × domestica and St-RNase from M. transitoria show 100% identity of the HV region at the deduced amino acid level, suggesting that these S-RNases diverged more recently than the other Malus S-RNases. In ‘Ligol’, the agronomically most important cultivar in Poland, the S2 and S9 were identified.

Keywords

Malus × domestica Borkh. Skb-allele RT-PCR Trans-generic S-RNase 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Grant No. 504-10-04020011.

References

  1. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T (2006) The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22:195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banno K, Kumashiro K, Tateishi S, Takamizawa M, Kiura Y, Tokuhisa F, Tanabe K (1993) Breeding of intergeneric hybrids between Japanese pear and the apple. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 62(1):138–139Google Scholar
  3. Broothaerts W (2003) New findings in apple S-genotype analysis resolve previous confusion and request the re-numbering of some S-alleles. Theor Appl Genet 106:703–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Broothaerts W, Janssens GA, Proost P, Broekaert WF (1995) cDNA cloning and molecular analysis of two self-incompatibility alleles from apple. Plant Mol Biol 27:499–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell CS, Evans RC, Morgan DR, Dickinson TA, Arsenault MP (2007) Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Pl Syst Evol 266:119–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clamp M, Cuff J, Searle SM, Barton GJ (2004) The Jalview Java alignment editor. Bioinformatics 2004(20):426–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Entani T, Iwano M, Shiba H, Che FS, Isogai A, Takayama S (2003) Comparative analysis of the self-incompatibility (S-) locus region of Prunus mume: identification of a pollen-expressed F-box gene with allelic diversity. Genes Cells 8:203–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans RC, Campbell CS (2002) The origin of the apple subfamily (Rosaceae: Maloideae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI genes. Amer J Bot 89:1478–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5:164–166Google Scholar
  10. Golz JF, Su V, Clarke AE, Newbigin E (1999) A molecular description of mutations affecting the pollen components of the Nicotiana alata S locus. Genetics 152:1123–1135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Godron DA (1874) De l’hybridité dans le genre Sorbier. Revue des Sc Nat 4:443–447Google Scholar
  12. Guex N, Peitsch MC (1997) SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling. Electrophoresis 18:2714–2723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hauck NR, Yamane H, Tao R, Iezzoni AF (2006) Accumulation of nonfunctional S-haplotypes results in the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility in tetraploid Prunus. Genetics 172:1191–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horiuchi H, Yanai K, Takagi M, Yano K, Wakabayashi E, Sanda A, Mine S, Ohgi K, Irie M (1998) Primary structure of a base nonspecific ribonuclease from Rhizopus niveus. J Biochem 103:408–418Google Scholar
  15. Hua ZH, Kao T-h (2006) Identification and characterization of components of a putative Petunia S-locus F-box containing E3 ligase complex involved in S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 18:2531–2553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hua ZH, Kao T-h (2008) Identification of major lysine residues of S 3-RNase of Petunia inflata involved in ubiquitin–26S proteasome-mediated degradation in vitro. Plant J 54:1094–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hua ZH, Fields A, Kao Th (2008) Biochemical models for S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Mol Plant 1(4):575–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ide H, Kimura M, Arai M, Funatsu G (1991) The complete amino acid sequence of ribonuclease from the seeds of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia). FEBS Lett 284:161–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ikeda K, Igic B, Ushijima K, Yamane H, Hauck NR, Nakano R, Sassa H, Iezzoni AF, Kohn JR, Tao R (2004) Primary structural features of the S haplotype-specific F-box protein, SFB, in Prunus. Sex Plant Reprod 16:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ioerger TR, Clark AG, Kao T-H (1990) Polymorphism at the selfincompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9732–9735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Irie M (1997) Structures and functions of ribonucleases. Yakugaku Zasshi 117(9):561–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishimizu T, Norioka S, Kanai M, Clarke AE, Sakiyama F (1996) Location of cysteine and cystine residues in S-ribonucleases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Eur J Biochem 242:627–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishimizu T, Shinkawa T, Sakiyama F, Norioka S (1998) Primary structural features of rosaceous S-RNases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Plant Mol Biol 37:931–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janssens GA, Goderis IJ, Broekaert WF, Broothaerts W (1995) A molecular method for S allele identification in apple based on allele-specific PCR. Theor Appl Genet 91:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jost W, Bak H, Glund K, Terpstra P, Beintema JJ (1991) Amino acid sequence of an extracellular, phosphate-starvation-induced ribonuclease from cultured tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cells. Eur J Biochem 198:1–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kato S, Mukai Y (2004) Allelic diversity of S-RNase at the self-incompatibility locus in natural flowering cherry populations (Prunus lannesiana var. speciosa). Heredity 92:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kawata Y, Sakiyama F, Hayashi F, Kyogoku Y (1989) Identification of two essential histidine residues of ribonuclease T2 from Aspergillus oryzae. Eur J Biochem 187:255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kawata Y, Sakiyama F, Tamaoki H (1998) Amino acid sequence of ribonuclease T2 from Aspergillus oryzae. Eur J Biochem 176:683–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurihara H, Nonaka T, Mitsui Y, Ohgi K, Irie M, Nakamura KT (1996) The crystal structure of ribonuclease Rh from Rhizopus niveus at 2.0 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 255:310–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) ClustalW and ClustalX version 2. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Cherukuri PF, DeWeese-Scott C, Geer LY, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Shoemaker BA, Simonyan V, Song JS, Thiessen PA, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Bryant SH (2005) CDD: a conserved domain database for protein classification. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D192–D196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matsumoto S, Kitahara K (2000) Discovery of a new self-incompatibility allele in apple. HortScience 35:1329–1332Google Scholar
  33. Matsumoto S, Suzuki M, Kitahara K, Soejima J (2000) Possible involvement of a new S-gene ‘St-RNase’ (accession no. AB035928) in the wild apple possessing high similarity to the ‘S3-’ and ‘S5-RNase’ in the Japanese pear. Plant Physiol 122:620Google Scholar
  34. Matsumoto S, Kitahara K, Komatsu H, Soejima J (2001) A functional S-allele, ‘Sg’, in the wild apple possessing a single amino acid, S-RNase ‘Sg’-RNase’, different from ‘Sg-RNase’ in Malus × domestica cultivars. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 76(2):163–166Google Scholar
  35. Matsuura T, Sakai H, Unno M, Ida K, Sato M, Sakiyama F, Norioka S (2001) Crystal structure at 1.5-Å resolution of Pyrus pyrifolia pistil ribonuclease responsible for gametophytic self-incompatibility. J Biol Chem 276(48):45261–45269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McClure BA, Franklin-Tong V (2006) Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in “self” pollen tube inhibition. Planta 224:233–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGinnis S, Madden TL (2004) BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 32:20–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson-Jones EB, Briggs D, Smith AG (2002) The origin of intermediate species of the genus Sorbus. Theor Appl Genet 105:953–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norioka N, Norioka S, Ohnishi Y, Ishimizu T, Oneyama C, Nakanishi T, Sakiyama F (1996) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequences of cDNAs encoding S-allele specific stylar RNases in a self-incompatible cultivar and its self-compatible mutant of Japanese pear, Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai. J Biochem 120:335–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Oddou-Muratorio S, Petit RJ, Guerroue BL, Guesnet D, Demesure B (2001) Pollen- versus seed-mediated gene flow in a scattered forest tree species. Evolution 55:1123–1135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohgi K, Horiuchi H, Watanabe H, Iwama M, Takagi M, Irie M (1992) Role of Asp51 and GlulO5 in the enzymatic activity of a ribonuclease from Rhizopus niveus. J Biochem 113:219–224Google Scholar
  42. Ohgi K, Iwama M, Ogawa Y, Hagiwara C, Ono E, Kawaguchi R, Kanazawa C, Irie M (1996) Enzymatic activities of several K108 mutants of ribonuclease (RNase) Rh isolated from Rhizopus niveus. Biol Pharm Bull 19:1080–1082PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ortega E, Bošković RI, Sargent DJ, Tobutt KR (2006) Analysis of S-RNase alleles in almond (Prunus dulcis): characterization of new sequences, resolution of synonyms and evidence of intragenic recombination. Mol Genet Genomics 276:413–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark JEE, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault M, Dickinsos TA, Campbell CS (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl Syst Evol 266:5–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Przybyla AA, Kantorowicz-Bąk M (2005) New Polish cultivars of apples. Proc of Int Sc Conf Environmentally Friendly Fruit Growing 222:15–19Google Scholar
  46. Qiao H, Wang F, Zhao L, Zhou J, Lai Z, Zhang Y, Robbins TP, Xue Y (2004a) The F-box protein AhSLF-S2 controls the pollen function of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 16:2307–2322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Qiao H, Wang F, Zhao L, Zhou J, Huang J, Zhang Y, Xue Y (2004b) The F-box protein AhSLF-S2 physically interacts with S-RNases that may be inhibited by the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway of protein degradation during compatible pollination in Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 16:582–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richards FM, Wyckoff HW (1971) Bovine pancreatic ribonuclease. In: Boyer PD (ed) The enzymes, 4th edn. Academic Press, New York, pp 647–806Google Scholar
  49. Richman AD, Kohn JR (1996) Learning from rejection: the evolutionary biology of single-locus incompatibility. Trends Ecol Evol 11:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robertson KR, Phipps JB, Rohrer JR, Smith PG (1991) A synopsis of genera of the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst Bot 16:376–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sassa H, Nishio T, Kowyama Y, Hirano T, Koba T, Ikehashi H (1996) Self-incompatibility (S) alleles of the Rosaceae encode members of a distinct class of the T2/S ribonuclease superfamily. Mol Gen Genet 250:547–557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sassa H, Kakui H, Miyamoto M, Suzuki Y, Hanada T, Ushijima K, Kusaba M, Hirano H, Koba T (2007) S locus F-box Brothers: multiple and pollen-specific F-box genes with S haplotype-specific polymorphisms in apple and Japanese pear. Genetics 175:1869–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sax K (1931) The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. J Arnold Arbor 12:3–22Google Scholar
  54. Sax K (1932) Chromosome relationships in the Pomoideae. J Arnold Arbor 13:363–367Google Scholar
  55. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC (2003) SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3381–3385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shimura I, Ito Y, Seike K (1983) Intergeneric hybrid between Japanese pear and quince. J Jpn Soc Hort Sci 52:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sonneveld T, Tobutt KR, Vaughan SP, Robbins TP (2005) Loss of pollen-S function in two self-compatible selections of Prunus avium is associated with deletion/mutation of an S haplotype-specific F-box gene. Plant Cell 17:37–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Šurbanovsky N, Tobutt KR, Konstantinović M, Maksimović SargentDJ, Stefanović V, Ortega E, Bošković R (2007) Self-incompatibility of Prunus tenella and evidence that reproductively isolated species of Prunus have different SFB alleles coupled with an identical S-RNase allele. Plant J 50:723–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sutherland BG, Tobutt KR, Robbins TP (2008) Trans-specific S-RNase and SFB alleles in Prunus self-incompatibility haplotypes. Mol Genet Genomics 279:95–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tanaka N, Arai J, Inokuchi N, Koyama T, Ohgi K, Irie M, Nakamura KT (2000) Crystal structure of a plant ribonuclease, RNase LE. J Mol Biochem 298:859–873Google Scholar
  61. Tsai D-S, Lee H-S, Post LC, Kreiling KM, Kao T-H (1992) Sequence of an S-protein of Lycopersicon peruvianum and comparison with other solanaceous S-proteins. Sex Plant Reprod 5:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ushijima K, Sassa H, Tao R, Yamane H, Dandekar AM, Gradziel TM, Hirano H (1998) Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding S-RNases from almond (Prunus dulcis): primary structural features and sequence diversity of the S-RNases in Rosaceae. Mol Gen Genet 260:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vieira J, Morales-Hojas R, Santos RAM, Vieira CP (2007) Different positively selected sites at the gametophytic self-incompatibility pistil S-RNase gene in the Solanaceae and Rosaceae (Prunus, Pyrus, and Malus). J Mol Evol 65:175–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Westwood MN, Lombard PB, Bjornstad HO (1989) Pear on ‘Winter Banana’ interstem with M. 26 apple rootstock as a compatible combination. HortScience 24:765–767Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamila Bokszczanin
    • 1
  • Andrzej Palucha
    • 2
  • Andrzej A. Przybyla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PomologyWarsaw University of Life SciencesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations