, Volume 165, Issue 1, pp 35–54 | Cite as

Trends in additive, dominance and environmental effects with age for growth traits in Eucalyptus hybrid populations

  • Jean-Marc Bouvet
  • A. Saya
  • Ph. Vigneron


Expression of additive and dominance effects during development of forest trees species is poorly documented. A set of 10 subpopulations, generated from factorial mating amongst subsets of 88 females and 107 males representing 684 families and 37,206 individual trees, was used to estimate variance components between 4 and 65 months in a Eucalyptus urophylla * grandis breeding population. The variance components were significantly different from zero for female, male and female-by-male interaction effects for height and circumference. The results, from the set of experiments, stressed the huge dispersion of variance component estimates among subpopulations. The trends were modelled using linear and nonlinear models. The trends in additive, dominance and environmental variances with age showed three phases corresponding to the stage of competition during stand development. No significant trend was observed for the coefficients of variation of these three effects. The dominance to additive variance ratio did not show specific age-related trends and was close to 1.2 during the growth period. The additive, dominance and environmental correlations between height and circumference were higher than 0.8 after 24 months. A similar age-related trend was observed for the additive and dominance effects. These results emphasise the significant role of dominance in the genetic control of growth traits. They differ from the majority of studies of pines, where additive variance is preponderant, but are similar to those of other eucalyptus studies. In the context of Congolese breeding strategy, this can be explained by the phenotypic selection of parents constituting the breeding population and/or the expression of overdominance in eucalyptus hybrid populations planted in marginal zones.


Eucalyptus hybrid Factorial mating design Growth traits Variance components Correlation Genetic parameter modelling 



We are grateful to the three founders of the research unit UR2PI for having supported this research over several years: the Ministry of Research of the Republic of the Congo, the company EFC and the CIRAD. We are grateful to the Unité de Recherche sur le Productivité des Plantations Industrielles (UR2PI) of the Republic of the Congo in Pointe Noire, especially to the monitoring team, for providing information and data on these three experimental designs. We are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments, which improved significantly the manuscript.


  1. Balocchi CE, Bridgwater FE, Zobel BJ, Jahromi S (1993) Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a nonselected population of loblolly pine. Forest Sci 39:231–251Google Scholar
  2. Becker WA (1984) Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, p 90Google Scholar
  3. Birchle JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S (2006) Unraveling the genetic basis of hybrid vigor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12957–12958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borralho NMG, Kanowski PJ, Cotterill PP (1992) Genetic control of growth of Eucalyptus globulus in Portugal. I Genetic and phenotypic parameters. Silvae Genet 41:39–45Google Scholar
  5. Bouillet JP, Safou-Matondo R, Laclau J-P, Ranger J (2002) Changes with age in the spatial localisation of roots of an Eucalyptus clone in the Congo impact on water uptake ability. Forest Ecol Manage 171:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouvet J-M (1991) Analyse des tests clonaux d’eucalyptus hybrids, réflexions sur la éthodologie de selection. Report of master of sciences, INAPG, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouvet J-M (1992) Geno-phenotypic regression and juvenile-mature correlations: methodological tools for clonal selection of Eucalyptus hybrids in Congo. S Afr For J 160:21–26Google Scholar
  8. Bouvet J-M (1999) Les plantations d’Eucalyptus: évolutions récentes et perspectives. Revue le Flamboyant 49:4–15Google Scholar
  9. Bouvet J-M, Vigneron P (1996) Variance structure in eucalyptus hybrid populations. Silvae Genet 45:2–3Google Scholar
  10. Bouvet J-M, Vigneron P, Gouma R, Saya A (2003) Trends in variances and heritabilities with age for growth traits in Eucalyptus spacing experiments. Silvae Genet 52:121–133Google Scholar
  11. Charcosset A, Mangin B, Moreau L, Combes L, Jourjon M-F, Gallais A (2000) Heterosis in maize investigated using connected RIL populations. In: Gallais A, Dillmann C, Goldringer I (eds) Quantitative genetics and breeding methods: the way ahead. Les Colloques de l’INRA, Paris, pp 90–98Google Scholar
  12. Costa e Silva J, Borralho NMG, Potts BM (2004) Additive and non-additive genetic parameters from clonally replicated and seedling progenies of Eucalyptus globulus. Theor Appl Genet 108:1113–1119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cotterill PP, Dean CA, van Wyk G (1987) Additive and dominance genetic effects in Pinus pinaster, P. radiata and P. elliottii and some implications for breeding strategy. Silvae Genet 36:221–232Google Scholar
  14. Cotterill PP, Brolin A (1997) Improving Eucalyptus wood, pulp and paper quality by genetic selection. In: Proceedings of the IUFRO conference on silviculture and improvement of Eucalypts. Salvador, Brazil, August 24–29, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  15. Dieters MJ, Nikles DG, Toon PG, Pomroy P (1997) Genetic parameters for F1 hybrids of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis with both Pinus oocarpa and Pinus tecunumanii. Can J For Res 27:1024–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franklin EC (1979) Model relating levels of genetic variances to stand development of four North American conifers. Silvae Genet 28:207–212Google Scholar
  17. Foster GS, Bridgwater FE (1986) Genetic analysis of fifth-year data from a seventeen parent partial diallel of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet 35:118–122Google Scholar
  18. Gallais A (1991) Théorie de la sélection en amélioration des plantes. Editions Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Gwaze DP, Dungey HS, Dieters MJ, Toon PG, Nikles DG (2000) Interspecific pine hybrids. I genetic parameter estimates in Australia. For Genet 7:11–20Google Scholar
  20. Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE, Williams CG (2002) Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theor Appl Genet 105:526–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hannrup B, Wilhelmson L, Danell Ö (1998) Time trends for genetic parameters of wood density and growth traits in Pinus sylvestris L. Silvae Genet 47:214–219Google Scholar
  22. Hardner C, Tibbits W (1998) Inbreeding depression for growth, wood, and fecundity traits in Eucalyptus nitens. For Genet 5:11–20Google Scholar
  23. Harfouche A, Kremer A (2000) Provenance hybridization in diallel mating scheme of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster). I means and variance components. Can J For Res 30:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodge GR, Volker PW, Potts BM, Owen JV (1996) A comparison of genetic information from open-pollinated and control-pollinated progeny tests in two eucalypt species. Theor Appl Genet 92:53–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Isik F, Li B, Frampton J (2003) Estimates of additive, dominance and epistatic genetic variances from a clonally replicated test of loblolly pine. For Sci 49:77–88Google Scholar
  26. Jansson G, Li B, Hannrup B (2003) Time trends in genetic parameters for height and optimal age for parental selection in scots pine. For Sci 49:696–705Google Scholar
  27. Jayawickrama KJS (2001) Estimated among-family and within family variances and heritabilities from three radiate pine clonal trials. For Genet 8:247–257Google Scholar
  28. Johnson IG (1996) Growth and form of Eucalyptus nitens progenies in New South Wales, and selection strategies for a seedling seed orchard. Aust For 59:162–170Google Scholar
  29. King JN, Carson MJ, Johnson GR (1998) Analysis of disconnected diallel mating designs ii—results from a third generation progeny test of the New Zealand Radiata Pine Improvement Programme. Silvae Genet 47:80–87Google Scholar
  30. Kusnandard DW, Galwey N, Hertzler GL, Butcher TB (1998) Age trends in variances and heritabilities for diameter and height in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster AIT.) in Western Australia. Silvae Genet 47:136–141Google Scholar
  31. Lambeth CC, Van Buijtenen JP, Duke SD (1983) Early selection is effective in 20-year-old genetic test of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet 32:210–215Google Scholar
  32. Latta RG (2003) Gene flow, adaptive population divergence and comparative population structure across loci. New Phytol 161:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lemos L, Carvalho A, Araujo JA, Borralho NMG (1997) Short note: importance of additive genetic and specific combining ability effects for rooting ability of stem cuttings in Eucalyptus globulus. Silvae Genet 46:307–308Google Scholar
  34. Lopez GA, Potts BM, Dutkowski GW, Apiolaza LA, Gelid P (2002) Genetic variation and inter-trait correlations in Eucalyptus globulus base population trials in Argentina. For Genet 9:217–231Google Scholar
  35. Lopez GA, Potts BM, Vaillancourt René E, Apiolaza Luis A (2003) Maternal and carryover effects on early growth of Eucalyptus globulus. Can J For Res 33(11):2108–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  37. Marques OG, Andrade HB, Ramalho MAP (1996) Assessment of the early selection efficiency in Eucalyptus cloeziana F. MUELL in the northwest of Minas Gerais state (Brazil). Silvae Genet 45:359–361Google Scholar
  38. Namkoog G, Usanis RA, Silen RR (1972) Age-related variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas-fir. Theor Appl Genet 42:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Namkoong G, Conkle MT (1976) Time trends in genetic control of height growth in ponderosa pine. For Sci 22:2–12Google Scholar
  40. Otegbeye GO (1991) Age trends in the genetic control of stem diameter of Eucalyptus tereticornis and the implication for selection. Silvae Genet 40:85–87Google Scholar
  41. Patinot-Valera F, Kageyama PY (1995) Parametros geneticos y espaciamieto en progenie de Eucalyptus saligna Smith Research Paper IPEF, Piracicaba (48/49):61–76, jun Dez 1995Google Scholar
  42. Paul AD, Foster GS, Caldwell T, McRae J (1997) Trends in genetic and environmental parameters for height, diameter, and volume in a multilocation clonal study with loblolly pine. For Sci 43:87–98Google Scholar
  43. Retief CL, Stanger TK (2007) Genetic parameters of pure and hybrid populations of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus urophylla and implications for hybrid breeding strategy. In a lecture on “Eucalypts and diversity: balancing productivity and sustainability”. Durban 22 on 26/10/2007Google Scholar
  44. SAS Institute Inc. (1990) SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6.03 edn. SAS Institute Inc., GaryGoogle Scholar
  45. Searle SR, Casella G, McCulloch CE (1992) Variance components. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Storfer A (1996) Quantitative genetics: a promising approach for the assessment of genetic variation in endangered species. Trends Ecol Evol 11:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM, Watson M, Volker PW, Hodge GR, Reid JB, West AK (1995) Detection and prediction of heterosis in Eucalyptus globulus. For Genet 2:11–19Google Scholar
  48. Van Wyk G (1990) Genetic improvement of timber yield and wood quality in Eucalyptus grandis (Hill) Maiden. Part 1. Genetic parameters of growth characteristics. S Afr For J 153:1–11Google Scholar
  49. Verrier E, Brabant P, Gallais A (2001) Faits et concepts de base en génétique quantitative. Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon Polycopié INA, Paris-GrignonGoogle Scholar
  50. Vigneron P, Bouvet J-M (1997) Eucalyptus in breeding of tropical plants. In: Charrier A, Jacquot M, Hamon S, Nicolas D (eds) Cirad, Orstom, Montpellier, Collection Repères, pp 267–290Google Scholar
  51. Volker PW, Dean CA, Tibbits WN, Ravenwood IC (1990) Genetic parameters and gains expected from selection in Eucalyptus globulus in Tasmania. Silvae Genet 39:18–21Google Scholar
  52. Volker PW, Potts B M, Borralho NMG (2008) Genetic parameters of intra- and inter-specific hybrids of Eucalyptus globulus and E. nitens. Tree Genet Genomes. doi: 10.1007/s11295-007-0122-0
  53. Wei X, Borralho NMG (1998a) Genetic control of growth traits of Eucalyptus urophylla ST Blake in South East China. Silvae Genet 47:158–164Google Scholar
  54. Wei X, Borralho NMG (1998b) Use of individual tree mixed models to account for mortality and selective thinning when estimating base population genetic parameters. For Sci 44:246–253Google Scholar
  55. Whiteman PH, Dean CA, Doran JC, Cameron JN (1992) Genetic parameters and selection strategies for Eucalyptus nitens (Dean and Maiden) in Victoria. Silvae Genet 41:77–81Google Scholar
  56. Xiang B, Li B, Isik F (2003) Time trend in genetic parameters in growth traits of Pinus taeda L. Silvae Genet 52:114–121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit “Genetic Diversity and Breeding of Forest Tree Species”Cirad Biological System DepartmentMontpellier CedexFrance
  2. 2.UR2PI: Research Unit on the Productivity of Commercial PlantationsPointe-NoireRepublic of the Congo

Personalised recommendations