, Volume 164, Issue 1, pp 199–207 | Cite as

Genetic association of lint yield with its components in cotton chromosome substitution lines

  • Jixiang WuEmail author
  • Johnie N. Jenkins
  • Jack C. McCarty
  • Sukumar Saha
  • Richard Percy


Dissection of the genetic relationship between lint yield and its yield components at the chromosome level may provide an additional avenue for yield enhancement in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Based on the conditional additive-dominance (AD) genetic model, we investigated the genetic structures of lint yield with its three component traits, lint percentage, boll weight, and boll number, using a two-location data set containing cotton chromosome substitution lines (chromosome or chromosome arm substituted from G. barbadense L. into G. hirsutum L., TM-1) which are defined as CS-B lines and their F2 hybrids with CS-B recurrent parent TM-1. We calculated the conditional variance components, contribution ratios, and contribution effects subject to the additive and dominant components. Our results showed that boll number or boll number with boll weight greatly reduced the conditional variance components and phenotypic variance for lint yield and thus indicated that boll number plays a more important role in lint yield than the other two component traits. We demonstrated that the G. barbadense chromosomes in CS-B16, CS-B18, and CS-B4sh were directly associated with reduced lint yield. Substituted chromosome arms 14sh, 22sh, and 22Lo were associated with reduced additive effects for lint yield through the component of boll weight, thus suggesting that some substituted chromosomes or chromosome arms may be indirectly associated with lint yield through yield component traits. This study provides a better understanding of cotton yield and its component traits at the chromosome level and this information should be useful in cotton breeding.


Yield components Conditional model Chromosome substitution lines Cotton 


  1. Ball RA, McNew RW, Vories ED, Keisling TC, Purcel LC (2001) Path analyses of population density effects on short-season soybean yield. Agron J 93:187–195Google Scholar
  2. Bora GC, Gupta SN, Tomer YS, Singh S (1998) Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in faba bean (Vicia faba). Indian J Agric Sci 68:212–214Google Scholar
  3. Cockerham CC (1980) Random and fixed effects in plant genetics. Theor Appl Genet 56:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Culp TW, Harrell DC (1975) Influence of lint percentage, boll size, and seed size on lint yield of upland cotton with high fiber strength. Crop Sci 15:741–746Google Scholar
  5. Graybill FA (1976) Theory and application of linear model. Duxbury, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenkins JN, Wu J, McCarty JC, Saha S, Gutierrez OA, Hayes R, Stelly DM (2006) Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cultivars: yield and yield components. Crop Sci 46:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Wu J, Saha S, Gutierrez OA, Hayes R, Stelly DM (2007) Genetic effects of Genetic effects of thirteen Gossypium barbadense L. chromosome substitution lines in topcrosses with upland cultivars: fiber quality traits. Crop Sci 47:561–572Google Scholar
  8. Jobson JD (1991) Applied multivariate data analysis volume II: categorical and multivariate methods. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Kohel RJ, Richmond TR, Lewis CF (1970) Texas marker-1. Description of a genetic standard for Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 10:670–671Google Scholar
  10. Krzanowski WJ (1988) Principles of multivariate analysis. Oxford Science Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Melchinger AE, Singh M, Link W, Utz HF, von Kittlitz E (1994) Heterosis and gene effects of multiplicative characters: Theoretical relationships and experimental results from Vicia faba L. Theor Appl Genet 88:343–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarty JC, Jenkins JN, Zhu J (1998) Introgression of day-neutral genes in primitive cotton accessions: I. Genetic variances and correlations. Crop Sci 38:1425–1428Google Scholar
  13. McCarty JC, Jenkins JN, Wu J (2004) Primitive accession germplasm by cultivar crosses as sources for cotton improvement I: phenotypic values and variance components. Crop Sci 44:1226–1230Google Scholar
  14. McCarty JC, Wu J, Saha S, Jenkins JN, Hayes R (2006) Effects of chromosome 5sh from Gossypium barbadence L. on flower production in G. hirsutum L. Euphytica 152:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller RG (1974) The jackknife: a review. Biometrika 61:1–15Google Scholar
  16. Myers RH (1990) Classical and modern regression with applications. PWS-KENT Publishing Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Piepho HP (1995) A simple procedure for yield component analysis. Euphytica 84:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saha S, Wu J, Jenkins JN Jr, McCarty JC, Gutiérrez OA, Percy RG, Raska DA, Stelly DM (2004) Association of agronomic and fiber traits with specific Pima 3-79 chromosomes in a TM-1 Background. J Cotton Sci 8:162–169Google Scholar
  19. Saha S, Jenkins JN, Wu J, McCarty JC, Percy RG, Cantrell RG, Stelly DM (2006) Effect of chromosome specific introgression in Upland cotton on fiber and agronomic traits. Genetics 172:1927–1938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Samonte SOP, Wilson LT, McClung AM (1998) Path analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Sci 38:1130–1136Google Scholar
  21. Sparnaajj LD, Bos I (1993) Components analysis of complex characters in plant breeding I. Proposed method for qualifying the relative contribution of individual components to variation of the complex characters. Euphytica 70:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stelly DM, Saha S, Raska DA, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Gutierrez OA (2005) Registration of 17 germplasm lines of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), each with a different pair of G. barbadense chromosome or chromosome arms substituted for the respective G. hirsutum chromosome or chromosome arms. Crop Sci 45:2663–2665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tang B, Jenkins JN, Watson CE, McCarty JC, Creech RG (1996) Evaluation of Genetic variances, heritabilities, and correlations for yield and fiber traits among cotton F2 hybrid populations. Euphytica 91:315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wen Y, Zhu J (2005) Multivariable conditional analysis for complex trait and its components. Acta Genet Sin 32(3):289–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Worley S, Culp TW, Harrell DC (1974) The relative contributions of yield components to lint yield of upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. Euphytica 23:399–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Worley S, Ramey HH, Harrell DC, Culp TW (1976) Ontogenetic model of cotton yield. Crop Sci 16:30–34Google Scholar
  27. Wright S (1920) The relative importance of heredity and environment in determining the piebald pattern of guinea-pigs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 6:320–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu J, Zhu J, Xu F, Ji D (1995) Analysis of genetic effect by environment interactions for yield traits in upland cotton (Chinese). Heredita 17(5):1–4Google Scholar
  29. Wu J, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC, Zhu J (2004) Genetic associations of yield with its component traits in a recombinant inbred line population of cotton. Euphytica 140:171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu J, Wu D, Jenkins JN, McCarty JC (2006) A recursive approach to detect multivariable conditional variance components and conditional random effects. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhu J (1989) Estimation of genetic variance components in the general mixed model. PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA (Diss abstract. DA 8924291)Google Scholar
  32. Zhu J (1993) Methods of predicting genotype value and heterosis for offspring of hybrids. J Biomath (Chinese) 8(1):32–44Google Scholar
  33. Zhu J (1994) General genetic models and new analysis methods for quantitative traits (Chinese). J Zhejiang Agric Univ 20:551–559Google Scholar
  34. Zhu J (1995) Analysis of conditional effects and variance components in developmental genetics. Genetics 141:1633–1699PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jixiang Wu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Johnie N. Jenkins
    • 2
  • Jack C. McCarty
    • 2
  • Sukumar Saha
    • 2
  • Richard Percy
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Soil SciencesMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Crop Science Research LaboratoryUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS)Mississippi StateUSA
  3. 3.United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations