Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 164, Issue 1, pp 113–122 | Cite as

Evaluation of drought tolerance for Atlas fescue, perennial ryegrass, and their progeny

  • Jianping P. Wang
  • Suleiman S. BughraraEmail author
Article

Abstract

Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) has good turf quality but low drought tolerance. Atlas fescue (Festuca mairei) has exceptional drought tolerance but poor turf quality. Intergeneric hybridization between the two grasses would have the potential to develop a plant combining the important turf traits of perennial ryegrass and the improved drought tolerance of Atlas fescue. The objectives of this study were to (1) investigate drought tolerance of progeny from the crossing of perennial ryegrass with Atlas fescue and (2) identify characteristics for screening under drought stress. A total of 19 genotypes were exposed to a 14-week drought treatment. Soil water content, leaf elongation, leaf water content, and leaf water potential were measured weekly, and root length and biomass were recorded after the treatment. Based on the weekly measurements of leaf elongation, leaf water content, and leaf water potential to drought stress, the plants were classified into four groups. Leaf elongation was a sensitive and helpful parameter for screening drought tolerant plants. Three groups were identified with high, moderate, and low drought tolerance based on a decrease in leaf elongation in response to declining soil water content. Some progeny in a high drought tolerant group rated better than the Atlas fescue parent. The results suggested that an improved drought tolerant perennial ryegrass could be developed through intergeneric hybridization by inheriting drought tolerance of Atlas fescue.

Keywords

Drought tolerance Atlas fescue Perennial ryegrass Soil water content Leaf elongation Leaf water content Leaf water potential 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Gregg Bert and Dr. Xuewen Huang for their assistance with this research.

References

  1. Abraham EM, Huang B, Bonos SA, Meyer WA (2004) Evaluation of drought resistance for Texas bluegrass, Kentucky bluegrass, and their hybrids. Crop Sci 44:1746–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson L, Gold J, Gull RJ (1987) Cool-season turfgrass response to drought stress. Crop Sci 27:1261–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borrill M, Tyler B, Lloyd-Jones M (1971) Studies in Festuca. 1. A chromosome atlas of bovinae and scariose. Cytologia 36:1–14Google Scholar
  4. Boyer JS (1988) Cell enlargement and growth-induced water potentials. Physiol Plant 73:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckner RC, Burrus II PB, Bush LP (1977) Registration of Kenhy tall fescue. Crop Sci 17:672–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckner RC, Boling JA, Burrus II PB, Bush LP, Hemken RA (1983) Registration of Johnstone tall fescue. Crop Sci 23:399–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casler MD, Pitts PG, Rose-Fricker C, Bilkey PC, Wipff JK (2001) Registration of ‘Spring Green’ Festulolium. Crop Sci 41:1365–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C (1996) Molecular genome characterization and introgression in Lolium perenne and Festuca species. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MOGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen C, Sleper DA (1999) FISH and RFLP marker-assisted introgression of Festuca mairei chromosome into Lolium perenne. Crop Sci 39:1676–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen C, Sleper DA, Chao S, Johal GS, West CP (1997) RFLP detection of 2n pollen formation by first and second division restitution in perennial ryegrass. Crop Sci 37:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cregg BM (2004) Improving drought tolerance of trees: theoretical and practical considerations. In: Fernandes T, Davidson CG (eds) Proceedings of the XXVI IHC-Nursery Crops, Can Int Dev Agency, p 147Google Scholar
  12. Crowder LV (1953) Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of Festuca and Lolium. J Hered 44:195–203Google Scholar
  13. Fry JD, Butler JD (1989) Responses of tall fescue and hard fescue to deficit irrigation. Crop Sci 29:1535–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallardo M, Jackson LE, Thompson RB (1996) Shoot and root physiological responses to localized zones of soil moisture in cultivated and wild lettuce (Lactuca spp.). Plant Cell Environ 19:1169–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang B, Gao H (1999) Physiological responses of diverse tall fescue cultivars to drought stress. HortScience 34:897–901Google Scholar
  16. Huang B, Gao H (2000) Root physiological characteristics associated with drought resistance in tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci 40:196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang B, Nobel PS (1992) Hydraulic conductivity and anatomy for lateral roots of Agave deserti during root growth and drought-induced abscission. J Exp Bot 43:1441–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphreys MW, Thomas H (1993) Improved drought resistance in introgression lines derived from Lolium multiflorum × Festuca arundinacea hybrids. Plant Breed 111:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson DE (1998) Applied multivariate methods for data analysts. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosola KR, Eissenstat DM (1994) The fate of surface roots of citrus seedlings in dry soil. J Exp Bot 45:1639–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marlatt ML, West CP, McConnell ME, Sleper DA, Buck GW, Correll JC, Saidi S (1997) Investigations on xeriphytic Festuca spp. from Morocco and their associated endophytes. Neotyphodium/Grass Interactions, Plenum Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. Matyssek R, Maruyama S, Boyer JS (1988) Rapid wall relaxation in elongating tissues. Plant Physio 86:1163–1167Google Scholar
  23. Morgen WG, Thomas H (1991) A study of chromosome association and chiasma formation in the amphiploid between Lolium perenne and Festuca drymeja. Heredity 67:241–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson CJ (1988) Genetic association between photosynthetic characteristics and yield: review of the evidence. Plant Physiol Biochem 26:543–554Google Scholar
  25. Norris IB (1985) Relationships between growth and measured weather factors among contrasting varieties of Lolium, Dacylis and Festuca species. Grass Forage Sci 40:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norris IB, Thomas H (1982) Recovery of ryegrass species from drought. J Agric Sci Camb 98:623–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SAS Institute Inc. (2003) Version 9. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Vol. I and II. Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  28. Slavik B (1974) Direct methods of water content determination. In: Slavik B (ed) Methods of studying plant water relations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 121–156Google Scholar
  29. Smucker AJM, Nunez-Barrios A, Ritchie JT (1991) Root dynamics in drying soil environments. Below Ground Ecol 1:1–5Google Scholar
  30. Stasovski E, Peterson CA (1991) The effects of drought and subsequent rehydration on the structure and vitality of Zea mays seedling roots. Can J Bot 69:1170–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas H (1987) Physiological responses to drought of Lolium perenne L.: measurement of, and genetic variation in, water potential, elasticity and cell hydration. J Exp Bot 38:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turgeon AJ (2002) Turfgrass management, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Brook, NJ, p 400Google Scholar
  33. Wang JP, Bughrara SS, Sleper DA (2003) Genome introgression of Festuca mairei into Lolium perenne detected by SSR and RAPD Markers. Crop Sci 43:2154–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wardlaw IF (1969) The effect of water stress on translocation in relation to photosynthesis and growth. II. Effect during leaf development in Lolium temulentum L. Aust J Biol Sci 22:1–16Google Scholar
  35. White RH, Engelke MC, Morton SJ, Ruemmele BA (1992) Competitive turgor maintenance in tall fescue. Crop Sci 32:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeller FJ (1999) Gene transfer with the aid of genome and chromosome manipulations between Festuca and Lolium species. J Appl Bot 73:43–49Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations