Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 164, Issue 1, pp 27–36 | Cite as

Performance of various grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) and pummelo (C. maxima Merr.) cultivars under the dry tropic conditions of Mexico

  • Salvador Becerra-Rodríguez
  • Víctor Manuel Medina-Urrutia
  • Marciano Manuel Robles-GonzálezEmail author
  • Timothy Williams
Article
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

Grapefruit growers in the tropics require information about existing and new citrus cultivars with high productivity potential. The objective of this study was to determine the growth, yield, and fruit quality performance of seven pigmented and four white grapefruit cultivars under the dry tropic conditions of Colima, Mexico. The trees were budded on sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) rootstock and planted at a distance of 8 × 4 m. ‘Oroblanco’ and ‘Marsh Gardner’ white-fleshed grapefruit cultivars and ‘Chandler’, a pink-fleshed pummelo, were the largest trees with the greatest height (5.0–5.6 m), canopy diameter (6.2–6.3 m), trunk diameter (21.9–23.3 cm), and canopy volume (109–123 m3). Lower height (4.3–4.8 m) and canopy volume (73–96 m3), but with similar canopy diameter to the previously mentioned cultivars, were recorded for the remaining pigmented cultivars. ‘Chandler’ pummelo and four pigmented grapefruit cultivars (‘Shambar’, ‘Río Red’, ‘Ray Ruby’, and ‘Redblush #3’) had yearly productions of 34.8, 34.9, 34.1, 32.7, and 30.6 ton ha−1, respectively. The most productive white grapefruit cultivar was ‘Marsh Gardner’ (30.5 ton ha−1). Grapefruit cultivars having the largest fruit size showed a higher inverse relationship between fruit weight and yield than those with small fruit. Most genotypes had higher values of fruit weight, juice content, and maturity index than those required by the local market. The most promising grapefruit cultivars based on their acceptable growth, yield superior to 30 ton ha−1, and acceptable fruit color were ‘Río Red’, ‘Shambar’, ‘Ray Ruby’, and ‘Redblush #3’.

Keywords

Dry tropic conditions Growth Juice content Maturity index ‘Rio Red’ Yield 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Fundación Produce Colima who supported this research.

References

  1. Barry GH, Veldman FJ (1996) Performance of nine grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.) cultivars under hot, subtropical southern African conditions. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:113–115Google Scholar
  2. Breedt HJ, Koekemoer PJJ (1996) Evaluation of rootstocks for grapefruit in South Africa. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:164–166Google Scholar
  3. Camacho BSE (1981) Citrus culture in high altitude American tropics. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:321–325Google Scholar
  4. Castle WS, Phillips RL (1980) Performance of ‘Marsh’ grapefruit and Valencia orange trees on eighteen rootstocks in a closely spaced planting. J Am Soc Hort Sci 105:496–499Google Scholar
  5. Castle WS, Wutscher HK, Youtsey CO, Pelosi RP (1988) Citrumelos as rootstocks for Florida Citrus. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 101:28–33Google Scholar
  6. Crescimanno FG, Deidda P, Fray AM (1981) Citrus rootstock trials in Sardinia: preliminary results on the performance of ten rootstocks for ‘Navel’ and ‘Valencia’ orange and for ‘Marsh’ grapefruit. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:119–123Google Scholar
  7. da Graca JV, Sauls JW (2000) Texas citriculture––past and present. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:451Google Scholar
  8. da Graca JV, Louzada ES, Sauls JW (2004) The origins of red pigmented grapefruits and the development of new varieties. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:369–374Google Scholar
  9. Donadio LC, Banzatto DA, Sempionato OR, Enciso CR (1996) Grapefruit cultivar evaluation. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:207–209Google Scholar
  10. Economides CV, Gregoriou C (1993) Growth yield and fruit quality of nucellar frost ‘Marsh’ grapefruit on fifteen rootstock in Cyprus. J Am Soc Hort Sci 118:326–329Google Scholar
  11. FAO (2004) Citrus fruit and processing. Annual Statistics FAO. Vialle delle Terme di Caracalla, 0100, Roma, 39 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Hearn CJ (1986) Development of seedless grapefruit cultivars through budwood irradiation. J Am Soc Hort Sci 111:304–306Google Scholar
  13. Hensz AR (1977) Mutation breeding and the development of the ‘Star Ruby’ grapefruit. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:282–285Google Scholar
  14. Hodgson RW (1973) Horticultural varieties of citrus. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor L (eds) The citrus industry, vol 1. Div. Agric. Sci., University of California, Berkeley, pp 431–589Google Scholar
  15. Human CF, Steenekamp PJ, Snyman CJ, Maritz JGJ (1996) Evaluation of grapefruit and Valencia cultivars in South Africa. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:231–233Google Scholar
  16. Lai Z, Chunling C, Qinliang S, Sunhua H, Dogmei L, Jianmei C, Zhenguang C (2000) Pummelo (Citrus grandis Osbeck) germplasm in Funjian: an important production region. 2000 Int Soc Citriculture Congress. Orlando Florida, pp 124 (Program and Abstract)Google Scholar
  17. Lins SQ, Zhang QY (2000) “Honyou”: a red color mutant of Pummelo. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:212 (abstract)Google Scholar
  18. Pardo A, Martínez C, Betancourt M, Del Val I, Estévez-Sanchez I, López A, Proenza M (1992) Grapefruit from the Isle of youth. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:108–109Google Scholar
  19. Ray R, Walheim L (1980) Citrus: how to select, grow and enjoy. Horticultural Publishing Co. Inc. 176 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Reuther W (1973) Climate and citrus behaviour. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor L (eds) The citrus industry, vol 3, Div. Agric. Sci., University of California, Berkeley, pp 280–337Google Scholar
  21. Sagarpa (2006) Sistema de información agropecuaria de consulta. SIACONGoogle Scholar
  22. Saunt J (1990) The grapefruit. In: Truman K (ed) Citrus varieties of the world. Sinclair International Limited, England, 128 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Sinclair WB (1972) The grapefruit physiology and products. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, 600 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Soler AJ (1999) Reconocimiento de Variedades de Cítricos en Campo. Generalitat Valenciana. Conselleria de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. 187 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Soost RK, Cameron JW (1980) ‘Oroblanco’, a triploid pummelo-grapefruit hybrid. HortScience 15:667–669Google Scholar
  26. Soost RK, Cameron JW (1985) ‘Melogold’, a triploid pummelo-grapefruit hybrid. HortScience 20:1134–1135Google Scholar
  27. Stover E, Pelosi R, Burton M, Ciliento S, Ritenour M (2004) Performance of ‘Oroblanco’ and ‘Melogold’ pummelo × grapefruit hybrids on nine rootstocks on calcareous, poorly drained soil. HortScience 39:28–32Google Scholar
  28. Zaragoza S, Trenor I, Medina F, Alonso E (1984) Agronomical behaviour of seven commercial citrus varieties cultivated in Spain. Proc Int Soc Citriculture 1:83–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvador Becerra-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Víctor Manuel Medina-Urrutia
    • 1
  • Marciano Manuel Robles-González
    • 1
    Email author
  • Timothy Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.INIFAP-Campo Experimental TecománTecomanMexico
  2. 2.Department of Botany and Plant SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations