, Volume 162, Issue 2, pp 281–289 | Cite as

Leaf type is not associated with ascochyta blight disease in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

  • Nader Danehloueipour
  • Heather J. Clarke
  • Guijun Yan
  • Tanveer N. Khan
  • K. H. M. Siddique


The three major leaf types in chickpea are normal compound leaf, simple leaf and multipinnate. Simple leaf types are less commonly cultivated worldwide and are often reputed to be susceptible to ascochyta blight disease, whereas other leaf types range from resistant to susceptible. This study determined the association between host plant resistance to ascochyta blight and different leaf types in segregating populations derived from crosses between disease resistant and susceptible chickpea genotypes. In addition, the inheritance of disease resistance and leaf type was investigated in intraspecific progeny derived from crosses between two resistant genotypes with normal leaf type (ICC 3996 and Almaz), one susceptible simple leaf type (Kimberley Large) and one susceptible multipinnate leaf type (24 B-Isoline). Our results showed that, in these segregating populations, susceptibility to ascochyta blight was not linked to multipinnate or simple leaf types; resistance to ascochyta blight depended more on genetic background than leaf shape; leaf type was controlled by two genes with a dihybrid supplementary gene action; normal leaf type was dominant over other leaf types; and inheritance of ascochyta blight resistance was controlled by two major genes, one dominant and one recessive. Since there was no linkage between ascochyta blight susceptibility and leaf type, breeding various leaf types with ascochyta blight resistance is a clear possibility. These results have significant implications for chickpea improvement, as most current extra large seeded kabuli varieties have a simple leaf type.


Ascochyta rabiei Grain legume Leaf shape 



We thank Mr Alan Harris and Mr Stuart Morgan for their expertise and assistance in field screening for disease. We thank Miss Leila Eshraghi for technical support. This research was supported by the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran and the Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA).


  1. Athwal DS (1963) Some X-ray induced and spontaneous mutations in Cicer. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 23:50–57 Google Scholar
  2. Bonfil DJ, Goren O, Mufradi I, Lichtenzveig J, Abbo S (2007) Development of early-flowering Kabuli chickpea with compound and simple leaves. Plant Breed 126:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell CL, Madden LV (1990) Temporal analysis of epidemics. I. Description and comparison of disease progress curves. In: Introduction to plant disease epidemiology. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 161–202Google Scholar
  4. Collard BCY, Pang ECK, Ades PK, Taylor PWJ (2003) Preliminary investigation of QTLs associated with seedling resistance to ascochyta blight from Cicer echinospermum, a wild relative of chickpea. Theor Appl Genet 107:719–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahiya BS, Waldia RS, Kumar R (1988) Relationship between leaf and seed characteristics in chickpea. Int Chickpea Newsl 18:6–7Google Scholar
  6. Danehloueipour N, Yan G, Clarke HJ, Siddique KHM (2006) Successful stem cutting propagation of chickpea, its wild relatives and their interspecific hybrids. Aus J Exp Agric 46:1349–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danehloueipour N, Yan G, Clarke HJ, Siddique KHM (2007) Diallel analyses reveal the genetic control of resistance to ascochyta blight in diverse chickpea and wild Cicer species. Euphytica 154:195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekbote RB (1942) Genetics of two mutations in Cicer. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 2:50–65Google Scholar
  9. Gan Y, Liu P, McDonald C (2003) Severity of ascochyta blight in relation to leaf type in chickpea. Crop Sci 43:2291–2294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Genstat (2003) Genstat for Windows 7th Edition (Version Cited 16 Jul 2007
  11. Gaur PM, Gaor VK (2003) Broad-few-leaflets and outwardly curved wings: two new mutants of chickpea. Plant Breed 122:192–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knights EJ (1991) Evaluation of multipinnate leaf. Int Chickpea Newsl 25:16–17Google Scholar
  13. Kusmenoglu I (1990) Ascochyta blight of chickpea: inheritance and relationship to seed size, morphological traits and isozyme variation. Dissertation, Washington State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Lichtenzveig J, Shtienberg HB, Zhang DJ, Bonfil DJ, Abbo S (2002) Biometric analyses of the inheritance to Didimella rabiei in chickpea. Phytopath 92:417–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Kusmenoglu I (1998a) Registration of ‘Sanford’ chickpea. Crop Sci 38:282Google Scholar
  16. Muehlbauer FJ, Kaiser WJ, Kusmenoglu I (1998b) Registration of ‘Dwelley’ chickpea. Crop Sci 38:283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pande S, Siddique KHM, Kishore GK, Bayaa B, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Bretag TW, Crouch JH (2005) Ascochyta blight of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review of biology pathogenicity, and disease management. Aus J Agric Res 56:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pundir RPS, Mengesha MH, Reddy KN (1990) Leaf types and their genetics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 45:197–200Google Scholar
  19. Reddy MV, Singh KB (1984) Evaluation of a world collection of chickpea germplasm accessions for resistance to ascochyta blight. Plant Dis 68:900–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh P, Bains TS, Kaur A (2005) Leaf and pod characters as selection criteria for large-seeded kabuli chickpea. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 12:17–18 Google Scholar
  21. Siddique KHM, Regan KL (2005) Registration of kabuli chickpea ‘Kimberley Large’. Crop Sci 45:1659–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siddique KHM, Regan KL, Malhotra RS (2007) Registration of ‘Almaz’ kabuli chickpea. Crop Sci 46:437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Singh B (1962) Inheritance studies of a new spontaneously originated simple leaf mutant in Cicer arietinum L. Sci Cult 28:138–139Google Scholar
  24. Singh DP, Singh BB (1992) Inheritance of morphological characters in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 52:55–57Google Scholar
  25. Singh KB, Reddy MV (1983) Inheritance of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea. Crop Sci 23:9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Srinivasan S, Gaur PM, Rao BV (2006) Relationships of pinnate (fern) and simple (unifoliate) leaf traits with seed yield and seed size in kabuli chickpea. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 13:7–9Google Scholar
  27. Tewari SK, Pandey MP (1986) Genetics of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 35:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vir S, Grewal JS, Gupta VP (1975) Inheritance of resistance to ascochyta blight in chickpea. Euphytica 24:209–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nader Danehloueipour
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Heather J. Clarke
    • 2
    • 3
  • Guijun Yan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tanveer N. Khan
    • 2
    • 4
  • K. H. M. Siddique
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, School of Plant BiologyThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Legumes in Mediterranean Agriculture (CLIMA)The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  3. 3.Institute of AgricultureThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (DAFWA)South PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations