Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 161, Issue 1–2, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Breeding objectives and the relative importance of traits in plant and animal breeding: a comparative review

  • Johann Sölkner
  • Heinrich Grausgruber
  • Ally Mwai Okeyo
  • Peter Ruckenbauer
  • Maria Wurzinger
Article

Abstract

Breeding objectives always involve consideration of multiple traits, even in situations where output of a single trait is dominant. We review literature dealing with formal definition of breeding objectives. Involvement of farmers in the process of setting up breeding objectives is also considered. In the optimal selection index, the relative importance of a trait is scaled by its economic value, derived as marginal profit related to a change in expression of defined size. Normative approaches to derive economic values use partial derivatives of a profit equation with respect to the traits involved or model the bio-economic system with various techniques. The theory is well developed and includes consideration of non-linear profit functions and traits with an intermediate optimum. It is frequently applied in animal breeding. In dairy cattle breeding, a major change of focus from traits related to output (i.e., milk yield) to traits related to cost of input (health, fertility, feed efficiency) has taken place recently. Plant breeders find the concept of deriving relative economic weights of traits difficult to apply and often replace the optimal index by restricted or desired gains indices. A change of paradigms similar to that in cattle breeding seems advisable. Participatory approaches to evaluate the relative importance of traits are more frequently applied in plant breeding than in animal breeding. We review two studies, dealing with methods of acquiring information about selection criteria of farmers planting maize in the Ethiopian highlands and of pastoralists keeping cattle in Uganda, in detail.

Keywords

Animal Breeding Participatory Plant Selection index 

References

  1. Allard RW, Bradshaw AD (1964) Implications of genotype–environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci 4:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer PR, Fox GC (1992) Estimation of economic weights in genetic improvement using neoclassical production theory: An alternative to rescaling. Anim Prod 54:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amer PR, Simm G, Keane MG, Diskin MG, Wickham BW (2001) Breeding objectives for beef cattle in Ireland. Livest Prod Sci 67:223–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annicchiarico P, Pecetti L (1998) Yield vs. morphophysiological trait-based criteria for selection of durum wheat in a semi-arid Mediterranean region (northern Syria). Field Crop Res 59:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baenziger PS, Russell WK, Graef GL, Campbell BT (2006) Improving lives: 50 years of crop breeding, genetics, and cytology (C-1). Crop Sci 46:2230–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker RJ (1986) Selection indices in plant breeding. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bänziger M, Lafitte HR (1997) Efficiency of secondary traits for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci 37:1110–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barwick SA, Henzell AL (2005) Development successes and issues for the future in deriving and applying selection indexes for beef breeding. Aust J Exp Agric 45:923–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernardo R (2002) Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, WoodburyGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry DP, Madalena FE, Cromie AR, Amer PR (2006) Cumulative discounted expressions of dairy and beef traits in cattle production systems. Livest Sci 99:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowman PJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME (1996) Customized selection indices for dairy bulls in Australia. Anim Sci 62:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brennan PS, Byth DE (1979) Genotype × environmental interactions for wheat yields and selection for widely adapted wheat genotypes. Aust J Agric Res 30:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown J (1988) An alternative approach to multivariate selection in plant breeding where genotypes are evaluated at many locations. Theor Appl Genet 76:76–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruns E, Bierbaum M, Frese D, Haring HJF (1978) Die Entwicklung von Selektionskriterien für die Reitpferdezucht. IV. Schätzung relativer ökonomischer Gewichte anhand von Auktionsergebnissen. Zuchtungskunde 50:93–100Google Scholar
  15. Ceron-Rojas JJ, Crossa J, Sahagun-Castellanos J, Castillo-Gonzalez F, Santacruz-Varela A (2006) A selection index method based on eigenanalysis. Crop Sci 46:1711–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conington J, Bishop SC, Waterhouse A, Simm G (2004) A bioeconomic approach to derive economic values for pasture-based sheep genetic improvement programs. J Anim Sci 82:1290–1304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelius PL, Seyedsadr M, Crossa J (1992) Using the shifted multiplicative model to search for separability in crop cultivar trials. Theor Appl Genet 84:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crossa J, Cornelius PL (1997) Site regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar tiral sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci 37:406–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Vries AG (1989) A model to estimate economic values of traits in pig breeding. Livest Prod Sci 21:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dekkers JCM (1991) Estimation of economic values for dairy cattle breeding goals: Bias due to sub-optimal management policies. Livest Prod Sci 29:131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dekkers JCM, Gibson JP (1998) Applying breeding objectives to dairy cattle improvement. J Dairy Sci 81:19–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dekkers JCM, Birke PV, Gibson JP (1995) Optimum linear selection indexes for multiple generation objectives with non-linear profit functions. Anim Sci 61:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Desclaux D, Hédont M (eds) (2006) Participatory plant breeding: Relevance for organic agriculture? Proceedings of the ECO-PB workshop, La Besse,11–13 June 2006. ITAB, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Eagles HA, Frey KJ (1974) Expected and actual gains in economic value of oat lines from five selection methods. Crop Sci 14:861–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elings A, Almekinders CJM, Stam P (2001) Introduction: Why focus the thinking on participatory plant breeding? Euphytica 122:423–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Everett RW (1975) Income over investment in semen. J Dairy Sci 58:1717–1722Google Scholar
  27. Flachenecker C, Frisch M, Falke KC, Melchinger AE (2006) Genetic drift and selection effects of modified recurrent full-sib selection programs in two F2 populations of European flint maize. Theor Appl Genet 113:1113–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gebre-Mariam H, Larter EN (1996) Genetic response to index selection for grain yield, kernel weight and per cent protein in four wheat crosses. Plant Breeding 115:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geidel H, Weber WE, Mechelke W, Haufe W (2000) Selection for sugar yield in sugar beet, Beta vulgaris, using different selection indices. Plant Breeding 119:188–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goddard ME (1983) Selection indices for non-linear profit functions. Theor Appl Genet 64:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Groen AF (1989) Cattle breeding goals and production circumstances. Dissertation, Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  32. Groen AF, Steine T, Colleau J-J, Pedersen J, Pribyl J, Reinsch N (1997) Economic values in dairy cattle breeding, with special reference to functional traits. Report of an EAAP-working group. Livest Prod Sci 49:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazel LN (1943) The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28:476–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hazel LN, Dickerson GE, Freeman AE (1994) The selection index–then, now, and for the future. J Dairy Sci 77:3236–3251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henderson CR (1963) Selection index and expected advance. In: Statistical genetics and plant breeding. Natl Acad Sci/Natl Res Counc Pub No 982. Natl Acad Sci, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  36. Hovenier R, Brascamp EW, Kanis E, van der Werf JH, Wassenberg AP (1993) Economic values of optimum traits: the example of meat quality in pigs. J Anim Sci 71:1429–1433PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Joshi A, Witcombe JR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Exp Agric 32:461–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kang MS (1993) Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agron J 85:754–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kempthorne O, Nordskog AW (1959) Restricted selection indices. Biometrics 5:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koenen EPC, Aldridge LI, Philipsson J (2004) An overview of breeding objectives for warmblood sport horses. Livest Prod Sci 88:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kosgey IS, van Arendonk JAM, Baker RL (2004) Economic values for traits in breeding objectives for sheep in the tropics: Impact of tangible and intangible benefits. Livest Prod Sci 88:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kosgey IS, Baker RL, Udo HMJ, van Arendonk JAM (2006) Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: A review. Small Ruminant Res 61:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lammerts van Bueren ET, van Soest LJM, De Groot EC, Boukema IW, Osman AM (2005) Broadening the genetic base of onion to develop better-adapted varieties for organic farming systems. Euphytica 146:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee SJ (1999) Improving the timber quality of Sitka spruce through selection and breeding. Forestry 72:123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin CY (2005) A simultaneous procedure for deriving selection indexes with multiple restrictions. J Anim Sci 83:531–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lin CY, Togashi K (2002) Genetic improvement in the presence of genotype by environment interaction. Anim Sci J 73:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Louw JH (1990) A selection index to cope with genotype-environment interaction with an application to wheat breeding. Plant Breeding 104:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Magnussen S (1990) Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain. Theor Appl Genet 79:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McClintock AE, Cunningham EP (1974) Selection in dual-purpose cattle population: defining the breeding objective. Anim Prod 18:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKeand SE, Eriksson G, Roberds JH (1997) Genotype by environment interaction for index traits that combine growth and wood density in loblolly pine. Theor Appl Genet 94:1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moav R, Hill WG (1966) Specialized sire and dam lines. IV. Selection within lines. Anim Prod 8:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mulatu E, Zelleke H (2002) Farmers’ highland maize (Zea mays L.) selection criteria: Implication for maize breeding for the Hararghe highlands of eastern Ethiopia. Euphytica 127:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murphy K, Lammer D, Lyon S, Carter B, Jones SS (2005) Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renew Agr Food Syst 20:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ndumu DB, Baumung R, Wurzinger M, Drucker AG, Okeyo AM, Semambo D, Sölkner J (2007) Performance and fitness traits versus phenotypic appearance in the African Ankole Longhorn cattle: a novel approach to identify selection criteria for indigenous breeds. Livest Sci (accepted)Google Scholar
  55. Nielsen HM, Christensen LG, Ødegard J (2006) A method to define breeding goals for sustainable dairy cattle production. J Dairy Sci 89:3615–3625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Olesen I, Groen AF, Gjerde B (2000) Definition of animal breeding goals for sustainable production systems. J Anim Sci 78:570–582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pesek J, Baker RJ (1969) Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can J Plant Sci 49:803–804Google Scholar
  58. Philipsson J, Banos G, Arnason T (1994) Present and future uses of selection index methodology in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 77:3252–3261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Quinton VM, Wilton JW, Robinson JA, Mathur PK (2006) Economic weights for sow productivity traits in nucleus pig populations. Livest Sci 99:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rewe TO, Indetie D, Ojango JMK, Kahi AK (2006) Economic values for production and functional traits and assessment of their influence on genetic improvement in the Boran cattle in Kenya. J Anim Breed Genet 123:23–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roosen J, Fadlaoui A, Bertaglia M (2005) Economic evaluation for conservation of farm animal genetic resources. J Anim Breed Genet 122:217–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scarpa R, Ruto ESK, Kristjanson P, Radeny M, Drucker AG, Rege JEO (2003) Valuing indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: An empirical comparison of stated and revealed preference value estimates. Ecol Econ 45:409–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharma RC, Duveiller E (2003) Selection index for improving Helminthosporium leaf blight resistance, maturity, and kernel weight in spring wheat. Crop Sci 43:2031–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma RC, Duveiller E (2006) Farmer participatory evaluation confirms higher grain yields in spring wheat using a selection index for spot blotch resistance, maturity and kernel weight. Euphytica 150:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shook GE (2006) Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals. J Dairy Sci 89:1349–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simmonds N, Smartt J (1979) Principles of crop improvement. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith HF (1936) A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals Eugenics 7:240–250Google Scholar
  68. Smith C, James JW, Brascamp EW (1986) On the derivation of economic weights in livestock improvement. Anim Prod 43:545–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sölkner J, Nakimbugwe H, Valle-Zarate A (1998) Analysis of determinants for success and failure of village breeding programmes. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia, 25:273–280Google Scholar
  70. Taba S, Diaz J, Franco J, Crossa J (1998) Evaluation of caribbean maize accessions to develop a core subset. Crop Sci 38:1378–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tano K, Kamuanga M, Faminow MD, Swallow B (2003) Using conjoint analysis to estimate farmer’s preferences for cattle traits in West Africa. Ecol Econ 45:393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Visscher PM, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME (1994) Breeding objectives for pasture based dairy production systems. Livest Prod Sci 40:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Witcombe JR, Joshi A, Joshi KD, Sthapit BR (1996) Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Exp Agric 32:445–460Google Scholar
  74. Witcombe JR, Joshi KD, Gyawali S, Musa AM, Johansen C, Virk DS, Sthapit BR (2005) Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. I. Four indicators of client-orientation in plant breeding. Exp Agric 41:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Witcombe JR, Gyawali S, Sunwar S, Sthapit BR, Joshi KD (2006) Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. II. Optional farmer collaboration in the segregating generations. Exp Agric 42:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wurzinger M, Ndumu D, Baumung R, Drucker AG, Okeyo AM, Semambo DK, Sölkner J (2006a) Assessing stated preferences through the use of choice experiments: stated preferences via choice cards: valuing (re)production versus aesthetics in the breeding goals of Ugandan Ankole cattle breeders. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Belo Horizonte, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  77. Wurzinger M, Ndumu D, Baumung R, Drucker A, Okeyo AM, Semambo DK, Byamungu N, Sölkner J (2006b) Comparison of production systems and selection criteria of Ankole cattle by breeders in Burundi, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Trop Anim Health Prod 38:571–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johann Sölkner
    • 1
  • Heinrich Grausgruber
    • 2
  • Ally Mwai Okeyo
    • 3
  • Peter Ruckenbauer
    • 2
  • Maria Wurzinger
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sustainable Agricultural SystemsUniversity of Natural Resources and Applied Life SciencesViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant BiotechnologyUniversity of Natural Resources and Applied Life SciencesViennaAustria
  3. 3.International Livestock Research InstituteNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations