Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 158, Issue 1–2, pp 241–247 | Cite as

T1 locus in cotton is the candidate gene affecting lint percentage, fiber quality and spiny bollworm (Earias spp.) resistance

  • Qun Wan
  • Zhengsheng ZhangEmail author
  • Meichun Hu
  • Li Chen
  • Dajun Liu
  • Xiao Chen
  • Wei Wang
  • Jing Zheng
Article

Abstract

A genetic linkage map of chromosome 6 was constructed by using 270 recombinant inbred lines originated from an upland cotton cross (Yumian 1 × T586) F2 population. The genetic map included one morphological (T1) and 18 SSR loci, covering 96.2 cM with an average distance of 5.34 cM between two markers. Based on composite interval mapping (CIM), QTL(s) affecting lint percentage, fiber length, fiber length uniformity, fiber strength and spiny bollworm resistance (Earias spp.) were identified in the t1 locus region on chromosome 6. The allele(s) originating from T586 of QTLs controlling lint percentage increased the trait phenotypic value while the alleles originating from Yumian 1 of QTLs affecting fiber length, fiber length uniformity, fiber strength and spiny bollworm resistance increased the trait phenotypic value.

Keywords

Fiber quality Lint percentage QTLs (quantitative trait loci) Spiny bollworm (Earias spp.) resistance Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (30370898, 30571187), and Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China (2006AA10Z1D3).

References

  1. Butler GD, Wilson FD, Fishler G (1991) Cotton leaf trichomes and populations of Empoasca lybica (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Prot 10:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Endrizzi JE (1975) Monosomic analysis of 23 mutant loci in cotton. J Hered 66:163–165Google Scholar
  3. Endrizzi JE, Kohel RJ (1966) Use of telosomes in mapping three chromosomes in cotton. Genetics 54:535–555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Guo WZ, Ma GJ, Zhu YC, Yi CX, Zhang TZ (2006) molecular tagging and mapping of quantitative trait loci for lint percentage and morphological marker genes in upland cotton. J Integrat Plant Biol 48:320–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han ZG, Guo WZ, Song XL, Zhang TZ (2004) Genetic mapping of EST-derived microsatellites from the diploid Gossypium arboreum in allotetraploid cotton. Mol Gen Genomics 272:308–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Han ZG, Wang CB, Song XL, Guo WZ, Guo JY, Li CH, Chen XY, Zhang TZ (2006).Characteristics, development and mapping of Gossypium hissutum derived EST-SSRS in allotetraploid cotton. Theor Appl Genet 112:430-439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kloth RH (1993) New evidence relating the pilose allele and micronaire reading in cotton. Crop Sci 33:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kloth RH (1995) Quantitative trait loci affecting cotton fiber are linked to the t1 locus in upland cotton. Theor Appl Genet 91:762–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knight RL (1952) The genetics of jassid resistance in cotton. I. The genes H1 and H2. J Genet 51:47–66Google Scholar
  10. Kohel RJ, Lewis CF, Richmond TR (1967) Isogenic lines in American upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.: preliminary evaluation of lint measurements. Crop Sci 7:67–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distance from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175Google Scholar
  12. Lacape JM, Nguyen TB, Thibivilliers S, Bojinov B, Courtois B, Cantrell RG, Burr B, Hau B (2003) A combined RFLP–SSR–AFLP map of tetraploid cotton based on a Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense backcross population. Genome 46:612–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee JA (1964) Effects of the pilose allele, H2, on a long staple upland cotton. Crop Sci 4:442–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee JA (1984) Effects of two pilosity alleles on agronomic and fiber traits in upland cotton. Crop Sci 24:127–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nguyen TB, Giband M, Brottier P, Risterucci AM, Lacape JM (2004) Wide coverage of the tetraploid cotton genome using newly developed microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 109:167–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Percy RG, Kohel RJ (1999) Qualitative genetics. In: Smith CW, Cothren JT (eds) Cotton. Origin, history, technology, and production. New York, Wiley, pp 319–360Google Scholar
  17. Shen XL, Zhang TZ, Guo WZ, Zhu XF, Zhang XY (2006) Mapping Fiber and Yield QTLs with Main, Epistatic, and QTL 3 Environment Interaction Effects in Recombinant Inbred Lines of Upland Cotton. Crop Sci 46:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simpson DM (1947) Fuzzy leaf in cotton and its association with short lint. J Hered 38:153–156Google Scholar
  19. Smith CW (1992) History and status of host plant resistance in cotton to insects in the United States. Adv Agron 48:251–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stelly DM (1993) Interfacing cytogenetics with the cotton genome mapping effort. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, La., 10–14 January 1993. National Cotton Council, Memphis, Tenn, pp 1545–1550 Google Scholar
  21. Summy KR, King EG (1992) Cultural control of cotton insect pests in the United States. Crop Protect 11:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang QY, Feng MG (2003) Data Processing System V6.01 for Windows 9x/xp. China Science Press. http://www.chinadps.net/Google Scholar
  23. Thomson LJ, Lee JA (1980) Insect resistance in cotton: a review and prospectus for Australia. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 1980:75–86Google Scholar
  24. Van Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) JoinMap 3.0, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Research International, Wageningen The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Voorrips RE (2006) MapChart 2.2: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Plant Research International, Wageningen The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang SC, Basten CJ, and Zeng ZB (2006) Windows QTL Cartographer WinQtlcartV2.5. Statistical Genetics, North Carolina State University. http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htmGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson FD, George BW (1986) Smoothleaf and hirsute cottons: response to insect pests and yield in Arizona. J Econ Entomol 79:229–232Google Scholar
  28. Wilson RL, Wilson FD (1975) Effect of pilose, pubescent, and smooth cottons on the cotton leafperforator. Crop Sci 15:807–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yi CX, Zhang TZ, Guo WZ (2001) Morphological and molecular tagging of lint percent QTLs in upland cotton. Acta Agron Sinica 27:781–786 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Zhang J, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ (2002) Molecular linkage map of allotetraploid (Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L.) with a haploid population. Theor Appl Genet 105:1166–1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang ZS, Xiao YH, Luo M, Li XB, Luo XY, Hou L, Li DM, Y Pei (2005) Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL analysis of fiber-related traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Euphytica 144:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qun Wan
    • 1
  • Zhengsheng Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meichun Hu
    • 1
  • Li Chen
    • 1
  • Dajun Liu
    • 1
  • Xiao Chen
    • 1
  • Wei Wang
    • 1
  • Jing Zheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Biotechnology & Crop Quality Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Agronomy & BiotechnologySouthwest UniversityChongqingP.R. China

Personalised recommendations