, Volume 156, Issue 1–2, pp 227–235 | Cite as

Cytology and pollen grain fertility in creeping bentgrass interspecific and intergeneric hybrids



Creeping bentgrass (Agrostisstolonifera L. or A. palustris Huds.) is a highly outcrossing allotetraploid species. It can form hybrids with a number of other Agrostis species and Polypogon genus. However, cytology and pollen grain fertility of the creeping bentgrass interspecific and intergeneric hybrids are not well known. In this research, chromosome pairing behaviors during meiosis I in F1 and pollen viability of F1 hybrids, as well as seed set rate and seed germination rate of backcrosses were studied in hybrids between creeping bentgrass, and other bentgrass species and three species of Polypogon genus. Abnormal chromosome pairing, laggard chromosomes, and premature segregation in F1 hybrids were found. Pollen viability ranged from 1.6 to 48.5% amongst F1 hybrids, significantly lower than that of the parents (85.5–94.1%). Some hybrids produced pollens of different sizes within the same anther. Seed set following backcrosses using F1 hybrids as the male parent and creeping bentgrass as the recurrent parent was significantly lower than their parents. The study of chromosome paring behaviors and progeny fecundity are important in utilizing the alien genes to improve bio-stress and abio-stress resistance, and in assessing the potential transgene risks of creeping bentgrass.


Creeping bentgrass Interspecific hybrid Intergeneric hybrids Meiosis analysis Pollen viability Seed set 


  1. Belanger FC, Plumley KA, Day PR, Meyer WA (2003a) Interspecific hybridization as a potential method for improvement of Agrostis species. Crop Sci 43:2172–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belanger FC, Meagher TR, Day PR, Plumley K, Meyer WA (2003b) Interspecific hybridization between Agrostis stolonifera and related Agrostis species under field conditions. Crop Sci 43:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorkman SO (1954) Chromosome studies in Agrostis. II. Heriditas 40:254–258Google Scholar
  4. Bjorkman SO (1960) Studies in Agrostis and related genera. Symb Bot Ups 17:1–112Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw AD (1958) Natural hybridization of Agrostis tenuis Sibth. and A. stolonifera L. New Phytol 57:66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen JF, Luo XD, Staub JE, Jahn MM, Qian CT, Zhuang FY, Ren G (2003) An allotriploid derived from an amphidiploid × diploid mating in Cucumis–I: production, micropropagation and verification. Euphytica 131:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christoffer PM (2003) Glyphosate resistant creeping bentgrass: studies in pollen-mediated transgene flow. M.Sc. Thesis Washington State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulibaly I, Louarn J, Lorieux M, Charrier A, Hamon S, Noirot M (2003) Pollen viability restoration in a Coffea canephora P. and C-heterocalyx Stoffelen backcross. QTL identification for marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet 106:311–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies WE (1953) The breeding affinities of some British species of Agrostis. Br Agric Bull 5:313–315Google Scholar
  10. Gardner DS, Danneberger TK, Nelson EK (2004) Lateral spread of glyphosate-resistant transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) lines in established turfgrass swards. Weed Technol 18:773–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hancock JF, Grumet R, Hokanson SC (1996) The opportunity for escape of engineered genes from transgenic crops. Hortscience 31:1080–1085Google Scholar
  12. Jones K (1956a) Species differentiation in Agrostis II. The significance of chromosome pairing in the tetraploid hybrids of Agrostis canina subsp. montana Hartm., A. tenuis Sibth. and A. stolonifera L. J Genet 54:377–393Google Scholar
  13. Jones K (1956b) Species differentiation in Agrostis III. Agrostis gigantea Roth. and its hybrids with A. tenuis Sibth. and A. stolonifera L. J Genet 54:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones K (1956c) Species differentiation in Agrostis. II. The significance of chromosome pairing in the tetraploid hybrids of Agrostis canina subsp. montana Hartmn., A. tenuis Sibth and A. stolonifera L. J Genet 54:377–393Google Scholar
  15. Kruse A (1973) Hordeum × Triticum hybrids. Hereditas 73:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stuckey IH, Banfield WG (1946) The morphological variations and the occurrence of aneuploids in some species of Agrostis in Rhode Island. Am J Bot 33:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wipff JK, Fricker CR (2000) Determining gene flow of transgenic creeping bentgrass and gene transfer to other bentgrass species. Diversity 16:36–39Google Scholar
  18. Wipff JK, Fricker CR (2001) Gene flow from transgenic creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) in the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 9:224–242Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations