Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 152, Issue 3, pp 339–349 | Cite as

Analysis of bulked and redundant accessions of Brassica germplasm using assignment tests of microsatellite markers

  • Von Mark V. Cruz
  • John D. Nason
  • Richard Luhman
  • Laura F. Marek
  • Randy C. Shoemaker
  • E. Charles Brummer
  • Candice A. C. GardnerEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine if Brassica germplasm bulks created and maintained by the USDA-ARS North Central Plant Introduction Station (NCRPIS) were made with genetically indistinguishable component accessions and to examine newly identified putative duplicate accessions to determine if they can be bulked. Using ten microsatellite primer pairs, we genotyped two bulks of B. rapa L. ssp. dichotoma (Roxb.) Hanelt comprising four accessions and three bulks of B. rapa L. ssp. trilocularis (Roxb.) Hanelt comprising fourteen accessions, as well as four pairs of putatively duplicate accessions of B.␣napus L. Assignment tests on ten individual plants per accession were conducted using a model-based clustering method to arrive at probabilities of likelihood of accession assignment. The assignment tests indicated that one of the two bulks of B. rapa ssp. dichotoma involves genetically heterogeneous accessions. It was observed in the B. rapa ssp. trilocularis bulks that the component accessions could be differentiated into groups, with misassignments observed most frequent within groups. In B. napus, only one of the four pairs of putative duplicates showed significant genetic differentiation. The other three pairs of putative duplicates lack differences and support the creation of bulks. The results of the assignment tests were in agreement with cluster analyses and tests of population differentiation. Implications of these results in terms of germplasm management include the maintenance and/or re-creation of some Brassica germplasm bulks by excluding those accessions identified as being unique in this study.

Keywords.

Brassica Duplicate Individual assignment Genetic resources SSRs Rapeseed Rationalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This is a journal paper of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, Project No. 1018, and was supported by Hatch Act and the State of Iowa. The authors wish to thank Ms. Jody Hayes and Ms. Lori Lincoln (USDA-ARS Corn Insect and Crop Genetics Research Unit) for help in the laboratory, and Dr. Mark P. Widrlechner for reviewing the draft manuscript. Mention of commercial brand names in this paper does not constitute an endorsement of any product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture or cooperating agencies.

References

  1. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and evaluation of two tests for detecting recent bottlenecks. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cruz VMV (2006) Molecular genetic analysis of oilseed Brassica: determination of life forms and germplasm management strategies by using microsatellite markers and FLOWERING LOCUS C gene sequences. PhD dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies N, Villablanco FX, Roderick GK (1999) Determining the source of individuals: multilocus genotyping in nonequilibrium population genetics. TREE 14(1):17–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean RE, Dahlberg JA, Hopkins MS, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S (1999) Genetic redundancy and diversity among ‘Orange’ accessions in the U.S. national sorghum collection as assessed with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Crop Sci 39:1215–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eastham K, Sweet J, (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): the significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. EEA Environmental Issue Report No. 28. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  6. Hintum TJL, Knüpffer H (1995) Duplication within and between germplasm collections. I. Identifying duplication on the bases of passport data. Genet Res Crop Evol 42:127–133Google Scholar
  7. Hintum TJL, Visser DL (1995) Duplication within and between germplasm collections. II. Duplication in four European barley collections. Genet Res Crop Evol 42:135–145Google Scholar
  8. Hintum TJL, Boukema IW, Visser DL (1996) Reduction of duplication in a Brassica oleracea germplasm collection. Genet Res Crop Evol 43:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houmiel KL, Slater S, Broyles D, Casagrande L, Colburn S, Gonzalez K, Mitsky TA, Reiser SE, Shah D, Taylor NB (1999) Poly(beta-hydroxybutyrate) production in␣oilseed leukoplasts of Brassica napus. Planta 209:547–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khachatourians GG, Summer AK, Phillips PWB (2001) An introduction to the history of canola and the scientific basis of innovation. In: Phillips PWB, Khachatourians GG (eds) The biotechnology revolution in global agriculture. CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp␣33–47Google Scholar
  11. Kimber DS, McGregor DI (1995) The species and their origin, cultivation and world production. In: Kimber DS, McGregor DI (eds), Brassica oilseeds: production and utilization. CABI, Oxon, UK, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  12. Lund B, Ortiz R, Skovgaard IM, Waugh R, Anderson SB (2003) Analysis of potential duplicates in barley gene bank collections using re-sampling of microsatellite data. Theor Appl Genet 106:1129–1138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McNaughton IH (1995) Swedes and rapes – Brassica napus (Cruciferae). In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, London, UK pp 68–75Google Scholar
  14. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106:283–392Google Scholar
  15. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354Google Scholar
  17. Phippen WB, Kresovich S, Candelas FG, McFerson JR (1997) Molecular characterization can quantify and partition genetic variation among genebank holdings: a case study with phenotypically similar accessions of Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. (cabbage) ‘Golden Acre’. Theor Appl Genet 94:227–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Primmer CR, Koskinen MT, Piironen J (2000) The one that did not get away: individual assignment using microsatellite data detects a case of fishing competition fraud. Proc R Soc Lond 267:1699–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rakow G, Woods D (1987) Outcrossing in rape and mustard in Saskatchewan prairie conditions. Can J Plant Sci 67:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Heredity 86:248–249Google Scholar
  22. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rohlf FJ (2005) NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, ver. 2.2. Exeter Software, Setauket, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Snowdon RJ, Friedt W (2004) Molecular markers in Brassica oilseed breeding: current status and future possibilities. Plant Breed 123:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Treuren R, Hintum TJL (2003) Marker-assisted reduction of redundancy in germplasm collections: genetic and economic aspects. Acta Hort 623:139–149Google Scholar
  26. Treuren R, Soest LMJ, Hintum TJL (2001) Marker-assisted rationalization of genetic resources collections: a case study in flax using AFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 103:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waser PM, Strobeck C (1998) Genetic signatures of interpopulation dispersal. TREE 13(2):43–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Von Mark V. Cruz
    • 1
  • John D. Nason
    • 2
  • Richard Luhman
    • 1
  • Laura F. Marek
    • 1
  • Randy C. Shoemaker
    • 1
    • 3
  • E. Charles Brummer
    • 1
  • Candice A. C. Gardner
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.USDA-ARS Corn Insect and Crop Genetics Research UnitAmesUSA
  4. 4.USDA-ARS Plant Introduction Research Unit and North Central Regional Plant Introduction StationAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations