Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 371–382 | Cite as

The need for characterisation and evaluation of germplasm: kiwifruit as an example

  • A. Ross FergusonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Genetic diversity provides the raw material for breeding and plant improvement. Breeders of plant species that have little or no history of improvement tend to make the greatest use of collections of raw or unimproved germplasm. Kiwifruit (Actinidia) are one such crop in that they have been subjected to little selection pressure and are still very similar to plants in the wild. To take advantage of the diversity in the genus Actinidia, breeders need to know the extent of the diversity and also need to be able to identify the plants with which they are working. Voucher specimens should be prepared for all plants used in experimental studies. A good understanding of the reproductive biology of Actinidia should facilitate incorporation of wild germplasm into kiwifruit breeding programmes. The HortResearch Actinidia collection has already proved its worth with the development of valuable new kiwifruit cultivars.

Keywords

Actinidia Breeding Germplasm Kiwifruit Reproductive biology Ploidy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge helpful discussions with RA Beatson, G Cipriani, PM Datson, LG Fraser, H-W Huang, the late C-F Liang, RG Lowe, MA McNeilage, BG Murray, T Paterson, AG Seal, R Testolin, J-H Wu and G-J Yan. I thank FA Gunson and C Kingston for reading the manuscript.

The HortResearch Actinidia germplasm collection is supported by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, the HortResearch Kiwifruit Royalties Investment Programme and ZESPRI International Ltd.

References

  1. Anderson E, Brown WL (1952) Origin of corn belt maize and its genetic significance. In: Gowen JW (ed) Heterosis. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 12–148Google Scholar
  2. Beverland M (2001) Creating value through brands: the ZESPRI™ kiwi fruit case. Br Food J 103:383–399Google Scholar
  3. Carputo D, Aversano R, Frusciante L (2005) Breeding potato for quality traits. Acta Hort 684:55–64Google Scholar
  4. Chapman CGD (1989) Collection strategies for the wild relatives of field crops. In: Brown AHD, Frankel OH, Marshall DR, Williams JT (eds) The use of plant genetic resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 263–279Google Scholar
  5. Cipriani G, Testolin R, Morgante M (1995) Paternal inheritance of plastids in interspecific hybrids of the genus Actinidia revealed by PCR-amplification of chloroplast DNA fragments. Mol Gen Genet 247:693–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clover GRG, Pearson MN, Elliott DR, Tang Z, Smales TE, Alexander BJR (2003) Characterization of a strain of Apple stem grooving virus in Actinidia chinensis from China. Plant Pathol 52:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Committee on Managing Global Genetic Resources: Agricultural Imperatives (1993) Managing global genetic resources: agricultural crop issues and policies. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Datson PM, Beatson RA, Harris-Virgin PM (2006) Meiotic chromosome behaviour in interspecific Actinidia hybrids. Paper presented at the 13th Australasian Plant Breeding Conference, Christchurch, 18–21 April 2006Google Scholar
  9. Dehmer KJ (2003) Molecular genome analyses as tools for efficient ex situ-conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Acta Hort 623:151–160Google Scholar
  10. Douglas J (2005) Exotic plants are the lifeblood of New Zealand: less regulation is needed to allow more new species into this country. NZ Garden J 8(1):2–6Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson AR (1990a) Kiwifruit (Actinidia). Acta Hort 290:603–653Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson AR (1990b) Botanial nomenclature: Actinidia chinensis, Actinidia deliciosa, and Actinidia setosa. In: Warrington IJ, Weston GC (eds) Kiwifruit: science and management. Ray Richards Publisher and NZ Society for Horticultural Science, Auckland, pp 36–57Google Scholar
  13. Ferguson AR, Bollard EG (1990) Domestication of the kiwifruit. In: Warrington IJ, Weston GC (eds) Kiwifruit: science and management. Ray Richards Publisher and NZ Society for Horticultural Science, Auckland, pp 165–246Google Scholar
  14. Ferguson AR, O’Brien IEW, Yan G-J (1997) Ploidy in Actinidia. Acta Hort 444:67–71Google Scholar
  15. Fraser LG, Harvey CF, Crowhurst RN, De Silva HN (2004) EST-derived microsatellites from Actinidia species and their potential for mapping. Theor Appl Genet 108:1010–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garris AJ, Casa AM, Kresovich S (2004) Molecular technologies and their role in maintaining and utilizing genetic resources. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. M Dekker, New York, pp 757–759Google Scholar
  17. Geibel M, Hohlfeld B (2003) Malus germplasm from Asia and its evaluation at the German Fruit Genebank. Acta Hort 623:275–282Google Scholar
  18. Gerrish EE, Jones Q, Rick CM (1981) Dicussion to Hawkes JG Germplasm collection, preservation, and use. In: Frey KJ (ed) Plant breeding II. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 71–81Google Scholar
  19. Goldblatt P, Hoch PC, McCook LM (1992) Documenting scientific data: the need for voucher specimens. Annals Miss Bot Gard 79:969–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman MM (1995) Maize. In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, London, pp 192–202Google Scholar
  21. He Z-C, Huang H-W, Yang Z (2003) Cytogenetic study of diploid Actinidia chinensis—karyotype, morphology of sex chromosome at primary differentiation stage and evolutionary significance. Acta Hort 610:379–385Google Scholar
  22. He Z-C, Li J-Q, Cai Q, Wang Q (2005) The cytology of Actinidia, Saurauia and Clematoclethra (Actinidiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 147:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang H-W, Ferguson AR (2007) Genetic resources of kiwifruit: domestication and breeding. Hort Rev 33. In pressGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang H-W, Wang Y, Zhang Z-H, Jiang Z-W, Wang S-M (2004) Actinidia germplasm resources and kiwifruit industry in China. HortScience 39:1165–1172Google Scholar
  25. Iezzoni AF (2005) Acquiring cherry germplasm from Central and Eastern Europe. HortScience 40:304–308Google Scholar
  26. Jung Y-H, Kim S-C, Kim M, Kim K-H, Kwon H-M, Oh M-Y (2003) Chloroplast inheritance patterns in Actinidia hybrids determined by single stranded conformation polymorphism analysis. Mol Cells 15:277–282PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li H-L (1952) A taxonomic review of the genus Actinidia. J Arn Arb 33:1–61Google Scholar
  28. Li J-Q, Li X-W, Soejarto DD (2006) A revision of the genus Actinidia from China. Acta Hort. In pressGoogle Scholar
  29. Li M-Z, Lowe RG (2006) Survey of wild Actinidia from Yangtze River region in China. Acta Hort. In pressGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang C-F (1983). On the distribution of Actinidias. Guihaia 3:22–248Google Scholar
  31. Liang C-F (1984) Actinidia. In: Feng K-M (ed) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 49/2. Science Press, Beijing, pp 196–268, 309–324Google Scholar
  32. McGhie TK, Ainge GD (2002) Color in fruit of the genus Actinidia: carotenoid and chlorophyll compositions. J Agric Food Chem 50:117–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNeilage MA (1991) Sex expression in fruiting male vines of kiwifruit. Sex Plant Reprod 4:274–278Google Scholar
  34. McNeilage MA (1997) Progress in breeding hermphrodite kiwifruit cultivars and understanding the genetics of sex determination. Acta Hort 444:73–78Google Scholar
  35. McNeilage M, Marsh H, Duffy A, Hofstee B, Fraser L (2006) All together now: the development and use of hermaphrodite breeding lines in Actinidia deliciosa. Acta Hort. In pressGoogle Scholar
  36. McNeill J (2004) Nomenclature of cultivated plants: a historical botanical standpoint. Acta Hort 634:29–36Google Scholar
  37. Matsunaga S, Sakai A, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T (1996) Cytological analysis of the mature pollen of Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit). Cytologia 61:337–341Google Scholar
  38. Murray BG (2002) Trees, maps and FISH: the application of genome based technologies to the analysis of chromosome evolution. Curr Genom 3:539–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oliveira MM, Fraser LG (2005) 1.1 Actinidia spp. (kiwifruit). In: Litz RE (ed) Biotechnology of fruit and nut crops. Biotechnology in agriculture No. 29. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 2–27Google Scholar
  40. Rajapakse S (2003) Progress in application of molecular markers to genetic improvement of horticultural crops. Acta Hort 625:29–36Google Scholar
  41. Schmid R (1978) Reproductive anatomy of Actinidia chinensis (Actinidiaceae). Bot Jahrb Syst Pflanzengesch Planzengeogr 100:149–195Google Scholar
  42. Simmonds NW (1962) Variability in crop plants, its use and conservation. Biol Rev 37:422–465Google Scholar
  43. Smekalova TN, Chukhina IG, Luneva NN (2003) Specific features of the strategy for in situ conservation of wild relatives of cultivated plants in Russia. Acta Hort 623:61–68Google Scholar
  44. Stalker HT (1989) Utilizing wild species for crop improvement. In: Stalker HT, Chapman C (eds) Scientific management of germplasm: characterization, evaluation and enhancement. IBPGR Training courses: lecture series 2. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, pp 139–154Google Scholar
  45. Tsang GK, Fraser LG, McNeilage MA, De Silva HN, MacRae EA (2006) Genetic markers: their transferability and usefulness across Actinidia. Acta Hort. In pressGoogle Scholar
  46. van Treuren R, van Hintum TJL (2003) Marker-assisted reduction of redundancy in germplasm collections: genetic and economic aspects. Acta Hort 623:139–149Google Scholar
  47. Wrigley G (1995) Coffee. In: Smartt J, Simmonds NW (eds) Evolution of crop plants, 2nd edn. Longman Scientific & Technical, London, pp 438–443Google Scholar
  48. Yan G-J, Ferguson AR, McNeilage MA, Murray BG (1997) Numerically unreduced (2n) gametes and sexual polyploidization in Actinidia. Euphytica 96:267–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhen Y-Q, Li Z-Z, Huang H-W, Wang Y (2004) Molecular characterization of kiwifruit (Actinidia) cultivars and selections using SSR markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 129:374–382Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HortResearchAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations