Euphytica

, Volume 151, Issue 3, pp 291–302

Identification of Gsr1 in Arabidopsis thaliana: A locus inferred to regulate gene expression in response to exogenous glutamine

  • R. Meyer
  • J. Yuan
  • J. Afzal
  • M. J. Iqbal
  • Mengxia Zhu
  • G. Garvey
  • David A. Lightfoot
Original Article

Abstract

An altered response to methylamine (MA) has been used to identify genes involved in nitrogen metabolism in many microbes and as an uncoupler of proton motive force in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The aim of this study was to attempt the use of MA to identify critical genes for response to exogenous nitrogen sources in Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress). EMS mutagenesis and selection on MA were used to identify a series of mutants that showed increased sensitivity to MA but failed to identify any MA resistant mutants. The eight sensitive mutants were allelic as judged by segregation and map location so one mutant, gsr1-1, was selected for intensive analysis. Co-segregation of gsr1 with DNA markers showed the gene was on chromosome 5 between markers CA72 and nga151, an interval of about 0.42 Mbp. The co-segregating mutant phenotypes associated with gsr1 included; yellow color caused by a reduction in chloroplast number; reduced chlorophyll content; decreased nitrate reductase (EC 1.7.1.3) activity in the root; and increased glutamate dehydrogenase (EC 1.4.1.2) activity in root and shoot. Decreased transcripts included those encoding several nitrogen metabolism enzymes. In contrast, the mutation increased only 4 and 7 transcript abundances by more than two fold. RT-PCR showed that in the dark, regulation of transcript abundance by exogenously applied glutamine and to a lesser extent sucrose were altered. Gene action of the gsr1 mutant was recessive for chloroplast number but co-dominant for transcript abundances and co-dominant for enzyme activities. Supplementary data from the analysis of preliminary microarray data from AFGC used 10,560 targets and two reverse labeled slides to show that more than 351 ESTs were increased in transcript abundance by more than 2 fold in the green plants. In yellow plants only seventy-three ESTs were up-regulated in transcript abundance by more than 2 fold. Therefore, the gsr1 locus may regulate responses to endogenous and exogenous glutamine in an organ-specific fashion that could coordinately regulate the activity of genes enzymes and metabolic pathways that determine cellular nitrogen, carbon and bioenergetic (redox) status.

Keywords

Arabidopsis Glutamine Chloroplast Methylamine Chromosome 5 Proton motive force Redox potential 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AGI ‘The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative’ (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant. Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameziane R, Bernhard K, Lightfoot DA (2000) Expression of the Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase gene in Nicotiana tabacum causes resistance to the herbicide phosphinothricin and exogenous ammonium chloride. Plant and Soil 221:45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AFGC (2000) Arabidopsis Functional Genomics Consortium. http://afgc.stanford.edu/
  4. Chang YL, Tao Q, Scheuring C, Ding K, Meksem K, Zhang HB (2001) An integrated map of Arabidopsis thaliana for functional analysis of its genome sequence. Genetics 159:1231–1242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Coruzzi G, Bush DR (2001) Nitrogen and carbon nutrient and metabolite signaling in plants. Plant Physiol 125:61–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coruzzi GM, Zhou L (2001) Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants, emerging ‘matrix effects’. Curr Oppin Plant Biol 4:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giersch C (1981) Stimulation of photophosphorylation by low concentrations of uncoupling amines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 100(2):666–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godon C, Krapp A, Leydecker MT, Daniel-Vedele F, Caboche M (1996) Methylammonium-resistant mutants of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia are affected in nitrate transport. Mol Gen Genet 250(3):357–366PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutierrez RA, Ewing RM, Cherry JM, Green PJ (2002) Identification of unstable transcripts in Arabidopsis by cDNA microarray analysis: rapid decay is associated with a group of touch- and specific clock-controlled genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11513–11518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huala E, Dickerman AW, Garcia-Hernandez M, Weems D, Reiser L, LaFond F, Hanley D, Kiphart D, Zhuang M, Huang W, Mueller LA, Bhattacharyya D, Bhaya D, Sobral BW, Beavis W, Meinke DW, Town CD, Somerville C, Rhee SY (2001) The Arabidopsis information resource (TAIR): a comprehensive database and web-based information retrieval, analysis, and visualization system for a model plant. Nucleic Acids Res 29:102–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iqbal J, Afzal J, Yaegashi S, Ruben E, Triwitayakorn K, Njiti N, Ahsan R, Wood J, Lightfoot DA (2002) A pyramid of loci for partial resistance to Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines maintains Myo-inositol-1-phosphate synthase expression in soybean roots. Theor Appl Genet 105(8):1115–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaiser BN, Finnegan PM, Tyerman SD, Whitehead LF, Bergersen FJ, Day DA, Udvardi MK (1998) Characterization of an ammonium transport protein from the peribacteroid membrane of soybean nodules. Science 281:1202–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lam HM, Peng SS, Coruzzi GM (1994) Metabolic regulation of the gene encoding glutamine-dependent asparagine synthetase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 106(4):1347–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lam HM, Chiu J, Hsieh MH, Meisel L, Oliveira IC, Shin M, Coruzzi G (1998) Glutamate-receptor genes in plants. Nature 396:125–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lightfoot DA, Long LM, Vidal ME (1999) Plants containing the gdhA gene and methods of use thereof. US Patent # 5,998,700Google Scholar
  16. Limami A, Phillipson B, Ameziane R, Pernollet N, Jiang Q, Roy R, Deleens E, Chaumont-Bonnet M, Gresshoff PM, Hirel B (1999) Does root glutamine synthetase control plant biomass production in Lotus japonicus L.? Planta 209:495–502Google Scholar
  17. Lloyd JC, Zakhleniuk OV (2004) Responses of primary and secondary metabolism to sugar accumulation revealed by microarray expression analysis of the Arabidopsis mutant, pho3. J Exp Bot 55:1221–1230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lukowitz W, Gillmor CS, Scheible WR (2000) Positional cloning in Arabidopsis. Why it feels good to have a genome initiative working for you. Plant Physiol 23:795–805Google Scholar
  19. Maguire LT, Grimmond S, Forrest A, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Meksem K, Gresshoff P (2002) Tissue-specific gene expression in soybean (Glycine max) detected by cDNA microarray analysis. J Plant Physiol 159:1361–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Marra M, Kucaba T, Sekhon M, Hillier L, Martienssen R, Chinwalla A, Crockett J, Fedele J, Grover H, Gund C, McCombie WR, McDonald K, McPherson J, Mudd N, Parnell L, Schein J, Seim R, Shelby P, Waterston R, Wilson R (1999) zA map for sequence analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Nature Genet 22:265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melo-Oliveira R, Oliveira IC, Coruzzi G (1996) Arabidopsis mutant analysis and gene regulation define a non-redundant role for glutamate dehydrogenase in nitrogen assimilation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4718–4723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer R (1997) A genetic analysis of response to ammonium and methylammonium in Arabidopsis thaliana. MS Thesis. SIUC, Carbondale IL, p 118Google Scholar
  24. Mozo T, Dewar K, Dunn P, Ecker JR, Fischer S, Kloska S, Lehrach H, Marra M, Martienssen R, Meier-Ewert S, Altmann T (1999) A complete BAC-based physical map of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. Nature Genet 22:271–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mungur R, Glass AD, Goodenow D, Lightfoot DA (2005) Metabolite fingerprint changes in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum altered by the Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase gene. J Biomed Biotech 2:198–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noctor G, Novitskaya L, Lea PJ, Foyer CH (2002) Co-ordination of leaf minor amino acid contents in crop species, significance and interpretation. J Exp Bot 53:939–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noctor G, Dutilleul C, De Paepe R, Foyer CH (2004) Use of mitochondrial electron transport mutants to evaluate the effects of redox state on photosynthesis, stress tolerance and the integration of carbon/nitrogen metabolism. J Exp Bot 55(394):49–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nolan DP, Voorheis HP (2000) Hydrogen ion gradients across the mitochondrial, endosomal and plasma membranes in bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei solving the three-compartment problem. Eur J Biochem 267:4601–4614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pevsner J (2003) Bioinformatics and functional fenomics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Rawat SR, Silim SN, Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM (1999) AtAMT1 gene expression and NH4+ uptake in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for regulation by root glutamine levels. Plant J 19:143–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schachtman DP, Schroeder JI, Lucas WJ, Anderson JA, Gaber RF (1992) Expression of a inward rectifying potassium channel by the Arabidopsis KAT1 cDNA. Science 258:1654–1658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaffer R, Landgraf J, Accerbi M, Simon V, Larson M, Wisman E (2001) Microarray analysis of diurnal and circadian-regulated genes in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 13:113–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheible WR, Fry B, Kochevenko A, Schindelasch D, Zimmer L, Somerville S, Loria R, Somerville CR (2003) An Arabidopsis mutant resistant to thaxtomin A, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor from Streptomyces species. The Plant Cell 15:1781–1794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schenk PM, Kazan K, Wilson I, Anderson JP, Richmond T, Somerville SC, Manners JM (2000) Coordinated plant defense responses in Arabidopsis revealed by microarray analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11655–11660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Specht JE, Hume DJ Kumudini SV (1999) Soybean yield potential: a genetic and physiological perspective. Crop Sci 39:1560–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stitt M, Muller C, Matt P, Gibon Y, Carillo P, Morcuende R, Scheible, W-R, Krapp A (2002) Steps towards an integrated view of nitrogen metabolism. J Exp Bot 53:959–970PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang R, Guegler K, LaBrie ST, Crawford NM (2000) Genomic analysis of a nutrient response in Arabidopsis reveals diverse expression patterns and novel metabolic and potential regulatory genes induced by nitrate. Plant Cell 12:1491–1510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang R, Tischner R, Gutierrez RA, Hoffman M, Xing X, Chen M, Coruzzi G, Crawford NM (2004) Genomic analysis of the nitrate response using a nitrate reductase-null mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 136:2512–2522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Meyer
    • 1
  • J. Yuan
    • 1
  • J. Afzal
    • 1
  • M. J. Iqbal
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mengxia Zhu
    • 2
  • G. Garvey
    • 1
  • David A. Lightfoot
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural SystemsSouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceSouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA
  3. 3.IALRBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations