Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 148, Issue 1–2, pp 135–150 | Cite as

Economic impacts of non-indigenous species: Miconia and the Hawaiian economy

  • Brooks A. Kaiser
Article

Summary

Imperfect scientific information regarding potential invasiveness, differences between private and public outcomes for individual decisions regarding planting, and inadequate prevention activity combine to impose costs through a change in native ecosystems susceptible to invasion by hardy, rapidly reproducing non-indigenous species. Concepts and tools from economic theory that may improve policy decisions are explored through the specific example of Miconia calvescens in Hawaii. Rapid expansion of M. calvescens, an ornamental tree introduced to several Pacific Islands over the last century, threatens local watersheds, endangered species, and recreational and aesthetic values in the Hawaiian and Society Islands. Potential welfare losses from the unchecked spread of Miconia in Hawaii are illustrated. Policy options investigated include accommodation of these losses, efforts at containment, or eradication. Estimates are determined through an optimal control model describing the potential expansion of the weed and its control costs and damages. Results suggest that cost-effective policies will vary with the level of invasion as well as the expected net benefits from control efforts.

Key Words

economic consequences of invasive species invasive species Miconia calvescens 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asquith, A., 1995. Alien species and the extinction crisis of Hawaii's invertebrates. Endangered Species Update 12(6).Google Scholar
  2. Carlton, J. & J.B. Geller, 1993. Ecological roulette: The global transport of nonindigenous marine organisms. Science 261(5117): 78–83.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, C., 1990. Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Conant, P. & G. Nagai, 1998. Control of infestations originating from single Miconia calvescens plants on O'ahu and Kauaí, Hawaií. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Conference on Miconia Control, August 26–29, 1997, Papeete, Tahiti, Gouvernement de Polynésie frančaisc/University of Hawaii at Manoa/Centre ORSTROM de Tahiti.Google Scholar
  5. Costanza, R., R. de Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton & M. van der Belt, 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diamond, P.A. & J.A. Hausman, 1994. Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? J Econ Perspect 8(4): 45–64.Google Scholar
  7. Eiswerth, M.E. & W.S. Johnson, 2002. Managing nonindigenous invasive species: Insights from dynamic analysis. Environ Resour Econ 23: 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, G.M. & A.C. Fisher, 1987. Valuing the environment as input. J Environ Manage 25: 149–56.Google Scholar
  9. new Freeman, A.M., 2003. The measurement of environmental and resource value: theory and methods. Washington D.C. Resources for the Future, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  10. Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP), 2003. Headquarters: Kirstenbosch Botanical Gardens, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gisp.org.
  11. Graf, A.B., 1974. Exotica: Pictorial Cyclopedia of Exotic Plants. Roehrs Company, Rutherford, NJ.Google Scholar
  12. Graf, A.B., 1986. Tropica: Color Cyclopedia of Exotic Plants and Trees. Roehrs, Rutherford, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Grambsch, A.E., R.G. Michaels, et al., 1993. Taking stock of nature: Environmental accounting for Chesapeake Bay. In: E. Lutz (Ed.), Toward Improved Accounting for the Environment, pp. 184–197. The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Haigh, L., 2001. Whacking Wattles for Water. Science in Africa. Retrieved fromhttp://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2001/june/wfw.htm.
  15. Hanemann, W.M., 1994. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect 8(4): 19–43.Google Scholar
  16. Kaiser, B. & J. Roumasset, 2000. Water management and the valuation of indirect services. Interdiscip Environ Rev Anthol 2000 II(2): 102–122.Google Scholar
  17. Kaiser, B. & J. Roumasset, 2002. Valuing indirect ecosystem services: The case of tropical watersheds. Environ Dev Econ 7(4): 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolstad, C.D., 1999. Environmental Economics. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Loomis, J.B. & D.S. White, 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis. Ecol Econ 18: 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loope, L.L., 1997. HNIS Report for Miconia Calvescens. USGS/BRD, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  21. McMillan, H.F., H.S. Barlow, et al., 1991. Tropical Planting and Gardening. Malayan Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  22. Medeiros, A.C., L.L. Loope, et al., 1997. Status, ecology and management of the invasive plant, Miconia calvescens DC (Melastomataceae) in the Hawaiian Islands. Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48: 23–36.Google Scholar
  23. Medeiros, A.C., L.L. Loope, et al., 1998. Interagency efforts to combat Miconia calvescens on the island of Maui, Hawaií. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Conference on Miconia Control, August 26–29, 1997, Papeete, Tahiti, Gouvernement de Polynésie frančaisc/University of Hawaii at Manoa/Centre ORSTROM de Tahiti.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, J.-Y., 1998. Epidemiology of the invasion by Miconia calvescens and reasons for a spectacular success. In: Proceedings of the First Regional Conference on Miconia Control, August 26–29, 1997, Papeete, Tahiti, Gouvernement de Polynésie frančaisc/University of Hawaii at Manoa/Centre ORSTROM de Tahiti.Google Scholar
  25. Perrings, C., M. Williamson, et al. (Eds.), 2000. The Economics of Biological Invasions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Portney, P.R., 1994. The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care. J Econ Perspect 8(4): 3–17.Google Scholar
  27. Service, U.S. F. a. W., 2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Reopening of Comment Period and Notice of Availability of the Draft Economic Analysis for Proposed Critical Habitat for the Oahu Elepaio. Department of the Interior, pp. 40960–40962.Google Scholar
  28. Staff, 2001. Oheo Gulch Entrance Fee to Help Miconia Eradication Program. Maui News, Maui, HI.Google Scholar
  29. Tavares, K. & G. Santos, 2002. Big Island Invasive Species Committee Emergency Environmental Workforce Hilo, April 15, 2002, Final Report. Operation Miconia, Hilo, HI.Google Scholar
  30. Van Kooten, C.G. & E.H. Bulte, 2001. The Economics of Nature: Managing Biological Assets. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Weitzman, M.L. & K.-G. Lofgren, 1997. On the welfare significance of green accounting as taught by Parable. J Environ Econ Manage 32: 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilcove, D.S., D. Rothstein et al., 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48(8): 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Working for Water Programme, 2003. South African Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Retrieved fromhttp://www.dwaf.gov.za/wfw.

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGettysburg CollegeGettysburgUSA

Personalised recommendations