Abstract
Time to flowering and maturity is an important adaptive feature in annual crops, including cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). In West and Central Africa, photoperiod is the most important environmental variable affecting time to flowering in cowpea. The inheritance of time from sowing to flowering (f) in cowpeas was studied by crossing a photoperiod-sensitive genotype Kanannnado to a photoperiod-insensitive variety IT97D-941-1. Sufficient seed of F1, F2, F3 and backcross populations were generated. The parental, F1, F2, F3 and the backcross populations were screened for f under long natural days (mean daylength 13.4 h per day) in the field and the parents, F1, F2 and backcross populations under short day (10 h per day) conditions. The result of the screening showed that photoperiod in the field was long enough to delay flowering of photoperiod-sensitive genotypes. Photoperiod-sensitivity was found to be partially dominant to insensitivity. Frequency distribution of the trait in the various populations indicated quantitative inheritance. Additive (d) and additive × dominance (j) interactions were the most important gene actions conditioning time to flowering. A narrow sense heritability of 86% was estimated for this trait. This will result in 26 days gain in time to flowering with 5% selection intensity from the F2 to F3 generation. At least seven major gene pairs, with an average delay of 6 days each, were estimated to control time to flowering in this cross.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken, Y., 1974. Flowering time climate and genotype: The adaptation of agricultural species to climate through flowering responses. pp. 10. Melbourne University Press. Australia.
Allard, R.W., 1967. Principles of Plant Breeding, pp. 15–78. Wiley, New York.
Bernier, G., A. Havelange, C. Houssa, A. Petitjean & P. Lejeune, 1993. Physiological signals that induce flowering. Plant Cell 5: 1147–1155
Bernard, R.L., 1971. Two major genes for time of flowering and maturity in soyabeans. Crop Sci 11: 242–244.
Buzzell, R.I., 1971. Inheritance of a soyabean flowering response to fluorescent-daylength conditions. Canad J Genet Cytol 13: 703–707.
Buzzell, R.I. & H.D. Voldeng, 1980. Inheritance of insensitivity to long daylength. Soyabean Genet Newsl 7: 26–29.
Capinpin, J.M. & T.A. Irabogon, 1950. A genetic study of pod and seed characters in Vigna. Philippine Agriculturist 33: 263–277.
Cavalli, L.L., 1952. An analysis of linkage in quantitative genetics. In: C.R. Rieve & C.H. Waddington (Eds.), Quantitative Inheritance, pp. 135–144. HSMO, London.
Coyne, D.P. & R.H. Matson, 1964. Inheritance of flowering and length of blooming period in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J Ame Soc Hort Sci 85: 366–373.
Craufurd, P.Q., Q. Aiming, R.J. Summerfield, R.H. Ellis, & E.H. Roberts, 1996. Development in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). III. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on time to flowering in photoperiod-sensitive genotypes and screening for photothermal responses. Expl Agric 32: 29–40.
Ehlers, J.D. & A.E. Hall, 1997. Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Field Crops Research 53: 187–204.
Ellis, R.H., R.J. Lawn, R.J. Summerfield, A. Qi, E.H. Roberts, P.M. Chay, J.B. Bouwer, J.L. Rose & S.J. Yeates, 1994. Towards the reliable prediction of time to flowering in six annual crops. III. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Exptl Agric 30: 17–29.
Hadley, P., E.H. Roberts, R.J. Summerfield, & F.R. Minchin, 1983. A quantitative model of reproductive development in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] in relation to photoperiod and temperature and implications for screening germplasm. Ann Bot 51: 531–543.
Hayman, B.I., 1958. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means Heredity 12: 173–196.
Ishiyaku, M.F., 1997. Inheritance of time to flowering in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Reading U.K
Ishiyaku, M.F. & B.B. Singh, 2003. Genetics of Juvenile phase in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. J Food Agric Env 1: 133–136.
Koornneef, M., C.J. Hanhart & J.H. van der Veen, 1991. A genetic and physiological analysis of late-flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 229: 57–66.
Kornegay, J., J.W. White, J.R. Dominquez, G. Tejada & C. Cajiao, 1993. Inheritance of photoperiod response in Andean and Mesoamerican common bean Crop Sci 33, 5: 977–984.
Lawrence, M.J. & J.L. Jinks, 1973. Quantitative Genetics. In: P.H. Sheppard (Ed.), Practical Genetics, pp. 88–129. Wiley, New York.
Levy, Y.Y. & C. Dean, 1998. The transition to flowering. Plant Cell 10: 1973–1989.
Leyna, H.K., S.S. Korban & D.P. Coyne, 1982. Changes in patterns of inheritance of flowering time of dry beans in different environments. J Hered 73: 306–308.
Mak, G. & T.C. Yap, 1980. Inheritance of seed protein content and other agronomic characteristics in long bean (Vigna sesquipedalis). Theor Appl Genet 56: 233–239.
McBlain, B.A. & R.L. Bernard, 1987. A new gene affecting the time of flowering in soyabeans. J Hered 78: 160–162.
Nishida, H., H. Inoue, Y. Okumoto & T. Tanisaka, 2002. A Novel Gene ef1-h Conferring an Extremely Long Basic Vegetative Growth Period in Rice. Crop Sci 42: 348–354.
Njoku, E., 1958. Photoperiodic responses of some Nigerian plants. J W Africa Sci Assoc 4: 99–111.
Ojomo, O.A., 1971. Inheritance of flowering date in cowpeas [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]. Trop Agric (Trinidad) 48: 277–282.
Pouteau, S., D. Nicholls, F. Tooke, E. Coen & N. Battey, 1997. The induction and maintenance of flowering in Impatiens. Development 124: 3343–3351.
Ray, J.D., K. Hinson, J.E.B. Mancono & M. Malo, 1995. Genetic control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean. Crop Sci 35: 1001–1006.
Roberts, E.H., R.J. Summerfield, R.H. Ellis & Q. Aiming, 1993. Adaptation of flowering in crops to climate. Outlook Agric 22: 105–110.
Roy, R.S. & R.H. Richharia, 1948. Breeding and inheritance studies on cowpea V. sinensis. J Ame Soc Agron 40: 479–489.
Sene, O., 1967. Determinisme genetique de la precocite’ chez Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp Agron Trop 22: 309–318.
Shapiro, S.S. & M.B. Wilk, 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4): 591–611.
Singh, B.B., 1993. Cowpea breeding. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Crop Improvement Division Archival Report, Part1 (1988–1992). IITA Publication. Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 65.
Slafer, G.A. & H.M. Rawson, 1995. Phyllochron in wheat as affected by photoperiod under two temperature regimes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24(2): 151–158.
Steele, W.M., 1972. Cowpeas In Nigeria. Ph D Thesis. The University of Reading. U.K.
Tiwari, A.S. & S. Ramanujam, 1976. Genetics of flowering response in mungbean. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 36: 418–419.
Vergara, B.S. & T.T. Chang, 1985. The flowering response of the rice plant to photoperiod. 4th ed. IRRI, Manila, the Philippines.
Vince-Prue, D., 1975. Photoperiodism in Plants. McGraw Hill. London. pp. 444.
Wienk, J.F., 1963. Photoperiodic effects in Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Ph D. Thesis. Medelingen Van de Landbouwhogeschool te Wageningen, Netherlands. pp. 82.
Wien, H.C. & R.J. Summerfield, 1980. Adaptation of cowpeas in West Africa: Effects of photoperiod and temperature responses in cultivars of diverse origin. In: R.J. Summerfield & A.H. Bunting (Eds.), Advances in Legume Science, pp. 405–417. HMSO. London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishiyaku, M.F., Singh, B.B. & Craufurd, P.Q. Inheritance of time to flowering in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Euphytica 142, 291–300 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-2435-0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-2435-0