, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 75–83 | Cite as

Effect of environment and genotype on bread-making quality of spring-sown spring wheat cultivars in China

  • Zhang Yong
  • He Zhonghu
  • Guoyou Ye
  • Zhang Aimin
  • Maarten Van Ginkel


Improvement of end-use quality in bread wheat depends on a thorough understanding of current wheat quality and the influences of genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) on quality traits. Thirty-nine spring-sown spring wheat (SSSW) cultivars and advanced lines from China were grown in four agro-ecological zones comprising seven locations during the 1998 and 1999 cropping seasons. Data on 12 major bread-making quality traits were used to investigate the effect of G, E, and G × E on these traits. Wide range variability for protein quantity and quality, starch quality parameters and milling quality in Chinese SSSW was observed. Genotype and environment were found to significantly influence all quality parameters as major effects. Kernel hardness, flour yield, Zeleny sedimentation value and mixograph properties were mainly influenced by the genetic variance components, while thousand kernel weight, test weight, and falling number were mostly influenced by the environmental variance components. Genotype, environment, and their interaction had important effects on test weight, mixing development time and RVA parameters. Cultivars originating from Zone VI (northeast) generally expressed high kernel hardness, good starch quality, but poor milling and medium to weak mixograph performance; those from Zone VII (north) medium to good gluten and starch quality, but low milling quality; those from Zone VIII (central northwest) medium milling and starch quality, and medium to strong mixograph performance; those from Zone IX (western/southwestern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau) medium milling quality, but poor gluten strength and starch parameters; and those from Zone X (northwest) high milling quality, strong mixograph properties, but low protein content. Samples from Harbin are characterized by good gluten and starch quality, but medium to poor milling quality; those from Hongxinglong by strong mixograph properties, medium to high milling quality, but medium to poor starch quality and medium to low protein content; those from Hohhot by good gluten but poor milling quality; those from Linhe by weak gluten quality, medium to poor milling quality; those from Lanzhou by poor bread-making and starch quality; those from Yongning by acceptable bread-making and starch quality and good milling quality; and those from Urumqi by good milling quality, medium gluten quality and good starch pasting parameters. Our findings suggest that Chinese SSSW quality could be greatly enhanced through genetic improvement for targeted well-characterized production environments.

baking quality bread wheat genotype by environment interaction genetic improvement Triticum aestivum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American Association of Cereal Chemists, 1983. Approved methods of the AACC. AACC, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  2. Atlin, G.N., R.J. Baker, K.B. McRae & X. Lu, 2000. Selection response in subdivided target regions. Crop Sci 40: 7–13.Google Scholar
  3. Baenziger, P.S., R.L. Clements, M.S. McIntosh, W.T. Yamazaki, T.M. Starling, D.J. Sammons & J.W. Johnson, 1985. Effects of cultivar, environment and their interaction and stability analyses on milling and baking quality of soft red winter wheat. Crop Sci 22: 5–8.Google Scholar
  4. Collaku, A., S.A. Harrison, P.L. Finney & D.A. Van Sanford, 2002. Clustering of environments of southern soft red winter wheat region for milling and baking quality attributes. Crop Sci 42: 58–63.Google Scholar
  5. Graybosch, R.A., C.J. Peterson, D.R. Shelton & P.S. Baenziger, 1996. Genotypic and environmental modification of wheat flour protein composition in relation to end-use quality. Crop Sci 36: 296–300.Google Scholar
  6. He, Z.H., R.J. Pena & S. Rajaram, 1992. High molecular weight glutenin subunit composition of Chinese bread wheats. Euphytica 64: 11–20.Google Scholar
  7. He, Z.H., 1999. Wheat production and quality requirements in China. In: Proceedings of the 9th Assembly of Wheat Breeding Society of Australia. Peter Williamson, Phillip Banks, Ian Haak, John Thompson & Anna Campbellpp (Eds.), pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
  8. He, Z.H., S. Rajaram, Z.Y. Xin & G.Z. Huang (eds.), 2001. A history of wheat breeding in China. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  9. He, Z.H., A.H. Liu, R.J. Pena & S. Rajaram, 2003. Suitability of Chinese wheat cultivars for production of northern style Chinese steamed bread. Euphytica 131: 155–163.Google Scholar
  10. Konik, C.M., L.M. Mikkelsen, R. Moss & P.J. Gore, 1994. Relationships between physical starch properties and yellow alkaline noodle quality. Starch 46: 292–299.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, J.J., Z.H. He, Z.D. Zhao, R.J. Pena & S. Rajaram, 2003. Wheat quality traits and quality parameters of cooked dry white Chinese noodles. Euphytica 131: 147–154.Google Scholar
  12. Mikhaylenko, G.G., Z. Czuchajowska, B.K. Baik & K.K. Kidwell, 2000. Environmental influences on flour composition, dough rheology, and baking quality of spring wheat. Cereal Chem 77: 507–511.Google Scholar
  13. Perretant, M.R., T. Cadalen, G. Charmet, P. Sourdille, P. Nicolas, C. Boeuf, M.H. Tixier, G. Branlard & S. Bernard, 2000. QTL analysis of bread-making quality in wheat using a doubled haploid population. Theor Appl Genet 100: 1167–1175.Google Scholar
  14. Peterson, C.J., R.A. Graybosch, P.S. Baenziger & A.W. Grombacher, 1992. Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Sci 32: 98–103.Google Scholar
  15. Peterson, C.J., R.A. Graybosch, D.R.Shelton & P.S. Baenziger, 1998. Baking quality of hard winter wheat: Response of cultivars to environment in the Great Plains. Euphytica 100: 157–162.Google Scholar
  16. SAS Institute, 1985. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  17. Wang, L.K., N.X. Zhao, J. Lan, A.H. Cheng, X.H. Gu, X.B. Zhang & H. Shan, 1998. Investigation on wheat quality in Heilongjiang province during 1994 to 1996. Heilongjiang Agric Sci 3: 69–72 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Zhang, H.G., J.X. Chen & X.L. Zhao, 1995. HMW-GS compositions of spring wheat cultivar on Qinghai plateau. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentails Sinica 4(4): 6–10 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Zhang, Y., Z.H. He, G.Y. Zhou & D.S. Wang, 1999a. Genotype and environment effects on major quality characters of winter-sown Chinese wheat. J Chinese Cereals Oils Assoc 14(5): 1–5 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Zhang, Y., Z.H. He, C.X. Ma, Y. Zhang, G.Y. Zhou & D.S. Wang, 1999b. The high molecular weight (HMW) glutenin subunit composition of spring-sown Chinese wheat and its association with bread-making quality. ACTA Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, Special Issue of Chinese Spring Wheat 14:2–9 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  21. Zhang, Y., Z.H. He, G.Y. Zhou & D.S. Wang, 2002a. Blending performance of hard wheat cultivar Zhongyou 9507. J Triticeae Crops 22(1): 1–4 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Zhang, Y., Z.H. He, M.F. Wang, G.Y. Zhou, D.S. Wang & Y. Zhang, 2002b. Investigation on milling and baking quality of Chinese spring-sown wheat. J Triticeae Crops 22(1): 27–32 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, Y. & Z.H. He, 2002c. Investigation on pasting property of spring-sown Chinese wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 35(5): 471–475 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  24. Zhuang, Q.S. (Eds.), 2003. Chinese wheat breeding and pedigree analysis. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhang Yong
    • 1
  • He Zhonghu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guoyou Ye
    • 3
  • Zhang Aimin
    • 4
  • Maarten Van Ginkel
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Crop Breeding and Cultivation, National Wheat Improvement Center/Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Breeding, Ministry of AgricultureChinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences (CAAS)BeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.CIMMYT-China Office, c/o CAASBeijingP.R. China
  3. 3.School of Land and FoodThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Genetics and Developmental BiologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingP.R. China
  5. 5.CIMMYTMexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations