Advertisement

Overcrowded Housing and Relationship Break-up

  • Maike van DammeEmail author
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

To what extent is there an association between crowding and relationship break-up? And if so, is it a causal relationship? Housing space may affect the probability of separation because of stress, lower subjective well being, and poor mental health, any of which could put pressure on the relationship with the partner and eventually cause a break-up. Using the Luxembourgish PSELL 2003–2011, we operationalize crowding with a subjective measure. We check for the following confounding factors: financial difficulties, home ownership, nationality, and type of household member. We find that there is no significant association between crowding and separation once confounders are taken into account, not to mention causality. Instead, home ownership turns out to be of the utmost importance in explaining the bivariate association between crowding and union dissolution.

Keywords

Divorce Housing Crowding Spuriousness Union dissolution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Matthias Kuepie and Laureen Vanni for their help with the data at various stages of the data manipulation and analyses. I would also like to thank Stéfanie André, Marie-Sophie Callens, Alessio Fusco, Amparo Nagore Garcia, Julien Licheron, Andrea Mercatanti, Javier Oliviera, and Alex Theloudis for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Funding

The author did not receive any funding for this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. André, S., DeWilde, C., & Muffels, R. (2017). Do housing wealth and tenure (change) moderate the relationship between divorce and subjective wellbeing? HOWCOME Working paper Series, (19). Tilburg University.Google Scholar
  2. Baldassare, M. (1983). Residential crowding and social behavior. In J. S. Pipkin, M. E. LaGory, & J. R. Blau (Eds.), Remaking the city. Social science perspectives on urban design (pp. 148–161). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, A., & Koman, S. (1976). Differential responses to anticipated crowding: Psychological effects of social and spatial density. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 526–536.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.526.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, A., & Paulus, P. B. (1987). Crowding. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (p. 533). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Becker, G., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1141.Google Scholar
  6. Bodson, L., & Segura, J. (2010). Le divorce au Luxembourg: en droit et en chiffres. Les cahiers du ceps/instead. nr. 2010-01. Esch-sur-Alzette.Google Scholar
  7. Boertien, D., & Härkönen, J. (2018). Why does women’s education stabilize marriages? The role of marital attraction and barriers to divorce. Demographic Research, 38, 1241–1276.Google Scholar
  8. Breen, R., & Karlson, K. B. (2014). Education and social mobility: New analytical approaches. European Sociological Review, 30(1), 107–118.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jct025.Google Scholar
  9. Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(2), 164–191.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113494572.Google Scholar
  10. Brons, M. D., & Härkönen, J. (2018). Parental education and family dissolution: A cross-national and cohort comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(2), 426–443.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12461.Google Scholar
  11. Brüderl, J., & Kalter, F. (2001). The dissolution of marriages: The role of information and marital-specific capital. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(4), 403–421.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990262.Google Scholar
  12. De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce: A comparison of marriage cohorts in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 561.Google Scholar
  13. Dewilde, C. (2008). Divorce and the housing movements of owner-occupiers: A European comparison. Housing Studies, 23(6), 809–832.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802423151.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission. (2016). MISSOC: Social protection in the Member States of the European Union. Situation on 1 January 1998–2006 and evolution. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_protection/missoc_tables_en.htm. Accessed January 16, 2017.
  15. EUROSTAT. (2014). Housing statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Housing_statistics. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
  16. EUROSTAT. (2016). Housing statistics. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Housing_statistics. Accessed 11 Mar 2019.
  17. Evans, G. W., & Lepore, S. J. (1993). Household crowding and social support: A quasiexperimental analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 308–316.Google Scholar
  18. Feijten, P., & van Ham, M. (2010). The impact of splitting up and divorce on housing careers in the UK. Housing Studies, 25(4), 483–507.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673031003711477.Google Scholar
  19. Foye, C. (2016). The relationship between size of living space and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9732-2.Google Scholar
  20. Fuller, T. D., Edwards, J. N., Vorakitphokatorn, S., & Sermsri, S. (1996). Chronic stress and psychological well-being: Evidence from Thailand on household crowding. Social Science and Medicine, 42(2), 265–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00089-5.Google Scholar
  21. Fusco, A. (2015). The relationship between income and housing deprivation: A longitudinal analysis. Economic Modelling, 49, 137–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.04.002.Google Scholar
  22. Gambaro, L., Joshi, H., & Lupton, R. (2017). Moving to a better place? Residential mobility among families with young children in the Millennium Cohort Study. Population, Space and Place, 23(8), e2072.  https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2072.Google Scholar
  23. González, L., & Viitanen, T. K. (2009). The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe. European Economic Review, 53, 127–138.Google Scholar
  24. Goode, W. J. (1962). Marital satisfaction and instability: A cross-cultural class analysis of divorce rates. International Social Science Journal, 14, 507–526.Google Scholar
  25. Goux, D., & Maurin, E. (2005). The effect of overcrowded housing on children’s performance at school. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 797–819.Google Scholar
  26. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Galle, O. R. (1979). Overcrowding in the home: An empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences. American Sociological Review, 44(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
  27. Graff-Reed, R. (2004). Positive effects of stressful life events: Psychological growth following divorce. Oxford, OH: Miami University.Google Scholar
  28. Guio, A.-C. (2018). Monoparentalité = Précarité? Paper presented at the Café-scientific Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  29. Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl011.Google Scholar
  30. Högnäs, R. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2010). Intergenerational relationships and union stability in fragile families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 72(5), 1220–1233.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00760.x.Google Scholar
  31. Jalovaara, M. (2001). Socio-economic status and divorce in first marriages in Finland 1991–93. Population Studies, 55(2), 119–133.Google Scholar
  32. Jalovaara, M. (2002). Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage. Demographic Research.  https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2002.7.16.Google Scholar
  33. Janssen, J. (2001). Do opposites attract divorce? Dimensions of mixed marriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  34. Karlson, K. B., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit. Sociological Methodology, 42(1), 286–313.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012444861.Google Scholar
  35. Kaya, N., & Weber, M. J. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of crowding and privacy regulation: American and Turkish students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 301–309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00087-7.Google Scholar
  36. Killewald, A. (2016). Money, work, and marital stability. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 696–719.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416655340.Google Scholar
  37. Kitson, G. C., & Morgan, L. A. (1990). The multiple consequences of divorce: A decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4, Family Research in the 1980s: The Decade in Review), 913–924.Google Scholar
  38. Krapf, S., & Wagner, M. (unpublished work). Housing affordability, housing tenure status and household density—Are housing characteristics associated with union dissolution?Google Scholar
  39. Kurz, K., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2004). Home ownership and social inequality in comparative perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Interpretation of statistical relations as research operation. In P. F. Lazarsfeld & M. Rosenberg (Eds.), The language of social research. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lersch, P. M., & Luijkx, R. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of homeownership in Europe: Revisiting the socialisation hypothesis. Social Science Research, 49, 327–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.010.Google Scholar
  42. Lersch, P. M., & Vidal, S. (2014). Falling out of love and down the housing ladder: A longitudinal analysis of marital separation and home ownership. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 512–524.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu055.Google Scholar
  43. Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2), 203–221.Google Scholar
  44. Matysiak, A., Styrc, M., & Vignoli, D. (2014). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies, 68(2), 197–215.Google Scholar
  45. Mikolai, J., & Kulu, H. (2018). Divorce, separation, and housing changes: A multiprocess analysis of longitudinal data from England and Wales. Demography, 55(1), 83–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0640-9.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Housing. (2017). Observatoire de l’Habitat. http://observatoire.liser.lu/.
  47. Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82.  https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006.Google Scholar
  48. Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 281–298.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-006-9050-9.Google Scholar
  49. Mulder, C. H., Dewilde, C., van Duijn, M., & Smits, A. (2015). The association between parents’ and adult children’s homeownership: A comparative analysis. European Journal of Population = Revue Europeenne de Demographie, 31(5), 495–527.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-015-9351-3.Google Scholar
  50. Nieuwenhuis, R., & Maldonado, L. (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment and policies. In R. Nieuwenhuis & L. Maldonado (Eds.), The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment and policies to improve well-being. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  51. Notten, G., & De Neubourg, C. (2011). Monitoring absolute and relative poverty: “Not enough” is not the same as “much less”. Review of Income and Wealth, 57(2), 247–269.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2011.00443.x.Google Scholar
  52. O’Connor, T., Pickering, K., & Dunn, J. (1999). Frequency and predictors of relationship dissolution in a community sample in England. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(3), 436–449.Google Scholar
  53. Palisi, B. J. (1984). Household crowding and well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 14(1), 17–31.Google Scholar
  54. Papp, L. M., Cummings, E. M., & Goeke-Morey, M. C. (2009). For richer, for poorer: Money as a topic of marital conflict in the home. Family Relations, 58(1), 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00537.x.Google Scholar
  55. Poortman, A.-R. (2005). How work affects divorce: The mediating role of financial and time pressures. Journal of Family Issues, 26(2), 168–195.Google Scholar
  56. Sierminska, E., & Doorley, K. (2013). To own or not to own? Household portfolios, demographics and institutions in a cross-national perspective. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research, nr. 611. DIW Berlin.Google Scholar
  57. Solari, C. D., & Mare, R. D. (2012). Housing crowding effects on children’s wellbeing. Social Science Research, 41(2), 464–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.012.Google Scholar
  58. Thomas, M. J., Mulder, C. H., & Cooke, T. J. (2017). Linked lives and constrained spatial mobility: The case of moves related to separation among families with children. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), 597–611.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12191.Google Scholar
  59. UN Statistics Division. (2017). Demographic Yearbook 2015. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2.htm.
  60. van Damme, M. (2019). The negative female educational gradient of union dissolution: Towards an explanation in six European countries. In: D. Mortelmans (Ed.), Divorce in Europe. Berlin: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  61. Wagner, M., & Mulder, C. H. (2015). Spatial mobility, family dynamics, and housing transitions. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 67(1), 111–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-015-0327-4.Google Scholar
  62. Wells, N. M., & Harris, J. D. (2007). Housing quality, psychological distress, and the mediating role of social withdrawal: A longitudinal study of low-income women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 69–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political and Social SciencesUniversitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations