The Decline in Marriage in Israel, 1960–2007: Period or Cohort Effect?
- 125 Downloads
Over the past four decades, the more developed countries have experienced a marked decline in the marriage rates of both men and women. The reasons for the decline remain a debated issue. Three explanations predict that the decline in marriage is a period effect, while two predict that it is a birth cohort effect. To determine whether the decline is a period or a cohort effect, this study performed an age–period–cohort analysis. Using data from Israel, our results show that both cohort replacement and period factors were important. Until 1990–1994 the decline in marriage was a period effect, whereas after 1990–1994 the decline was a cohort effect. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our results for the three major explanations of the decline in marriage.
KeywordsMarriage Second demographic transition Age–period–cohort model Israel
The research for this paper was supported by a grant from the National Insurance Institute of Israel. Earlier versions were presented at a colloquium at the Vienna Institute of Demography, August 2012, and at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, April 2013. We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their comments.
- Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival analysis using the SAS ® system: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
- Bachrach, C., Hindin, M. J., & Thomson, E. (2000). The changing shape of ties that bind: An overview and synthesis. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 3–16). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Ben-Moshe, E. (1989). Marriage squeeze and marriage patterns in Israel. In U. O. Schmelz & S. Dellapergola (Eds.), Papers in Jewish demography 1985 (pp. 87–95). Jerusalem: The Institute of Contemporary Jewry, Hebrew University.Google Scholar
- Billari, F., Liefbroer, A. C., & Philipov, D. (2006). The postponement of childbearing in Europe: Driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Ermisch, J. (1979). The relevance of the ‘Easterlin Hypothesis’ and the ‘New Home Economics’ to fertility movements in Great Britain. Population Studies, 33(1), 39–58.Google Scholar
- European Social Survey. (2010). Round 5. Data file edition 3.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway.Google Scholar
- Goldin, C. (2004). From the valley to the summit: The quiet revolution that transformed women’s work. NBER Working paper No. 10335.Google Scholar
- Haskey, J. (2001). Cohabitation in Great Britain: Past, present and future. Trends and attitudes. Population Trends, 103, 3–25.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe, R., & van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? In R. Lesthaeghe & J. Van de Kaa (Eds.), Groei of Krimp, book volume of Mens en Maatschappij (pp. 9–24). Deventer: Van Loghum-Slaterus.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.Google Scholar
- Oppenheimer, V. K., & Lew, V. (1995). American marriage formation in the 1980s: How important was women’s economic independence? In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 105–138). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- State of Israel. (1960–2014). Statistical abstract of Israel (Vols. 11–65).Google Scholar
- State of Israel. (2012). Household and families: Demographic characteristics 2009–2010. Publication number 1490.Google Scholar
- Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.Google Scholar