European Journal of Population

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 559–583 | Cite as

Migrating with Special Needs? Projections of Flows of Migrant Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Toward Europe 2016–2030

Article

Abstract

Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a rising issue in western societies as a consequence of international migration. Our paper presents demography-driven projections of female flows with FGM/C from each practicing country to each EU28 member state for the 3 sub-periods 2016–2020, 2021–2025, and 2026–2030, with the aim of supporting resource planning and policy making. According to our projections, the EU28 countries will receive a flow of around 400,000 female migrants between 2016 and 2020, and around 1.3 million female migrants between 2016 and 2030 from FGM/C practicing countries. About one-third of them, corresponding to an estimated 127,000 between 2016 and 2020, and more than 400,000 between 2016 and 2030 will have undergone FGM/C before migration. Among these female flows, slightly more than 20% is expected to be made up of girls aged 0–14. According to the expected age at arrival, 20% of these girls are expected to have already undergone FGM/C, while slightly less than 10% are to be considered potentially at risk of undergoing FGM/C after migration. As the number of women with FGM/C in Europe is expected to rise at quite a fast rate, it is important to act timely by designing targeted interventions and policies at the national and at the European level to assist cut women and protect children. Such measures are particularly compelling in France, Italy, Spain, UK, and Sweden that are expected to be the most affected countries by migration from FGM/C practicing countries.

Keywords

Female genital mutilation/cutting Public health Female migration Europe Projections Violence against women 

Supplementary material

10680_2017_9426_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (453 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 452 kb)

References

  1. Abdulcadir, J., Rodriguez, M. I., & Say, L. (2015). Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: An analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 122(3), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adepoju, A. (2011). Reflections on international migration and development in sub-Saharan Africa. African Population Studies, 25(2), 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. African Union. (2006). African common position on migration and development. Banjul, The Gambia: African Union. Internet resource. Accessed Nov 2016. http://www.un.org/en/africa/osaa/pdf/au/cap_migrationanddev_2006.pdf.
  4. Ahmed, S. A., Cruz, M., Go, D. S., Maliszewska, M., & Osorio-Rodarte, I. (2014). How significant is Africa’s demographic dividend for its future growth and poverty reduction? World Bank policy research working paper 7134. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Andro, A., Cambois, E., & Lesclingand, M. (2014). Long-term consequences of female genital mutilation in a European context: Self perceived health of FGM women compared to non-FGM women. Social Science and Medicine, 106, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, R., & Denison, E. (2012). Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, R., & Denison, E. (2013). A tradition in transition: Factors perpetuating and hindering the continuance of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) summarized in a systematic review. Health Care for Women International, 34(10), 837–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bijak, J., Disney, G., & Wisniowski, A. (2015). How to forecast international migration. CPC briefing paper 28. Southampton: ESRC Centre for Population Change.Google Scholar
  9. Blangiardo, G. C. (2014). Scenarios of migration inflows to the EU-28 members according to push factors related to the labor market in the countries of origin. KING project—demography unit overview paper no 11, Oct 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Bossard, L. (2009). The future of international migration to OECD countries regional note West Africa. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  11. Boswell, C. (2002). Addressing the causes of migratory and refugee movements: The role of the European Union. New issues in refugee research. Working paper no. 73. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, C., Beecham, D., & Barrett, H. (2013). The applicability of behaviour change in intervention programmes targeted at ending female genital mutilation in the EU: Integrating social cognitive and community level approaches. Obstetrics and Gynecology International Article ID 324362, 12 p.Google Scholar
  13. Cappon, S., L’Ecluse, C., Clays, E., Tency, I., & Leye, E. (2015). Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitude and practices of Flemish midwives. Midwifery, 31(3), e29–e35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chibber, R., El-Saleh, E., & El-Harmi, J. (2011). Female circumcision: Obstetrical and psychological sequelae continues unabated in the 21st century. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 24(6), 833–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clemens, M. A. (2014). Does development reduce migration? In R. B. L. Lucas (Ed.), International handbook on migration and economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Cross, C., Gelderblom, D., Roux, N., & Mafukidze, J. (2006). Views on migration in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Proceedings of an African migration alliance workshop. Cape Town: HSCR Press.Google Scholar
  17. Czaika, M., & De Haas, H. (2012). The role of internal and international relative deprivation in global migration. Oxford Development Studies, 40(4), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Czaika, M., & Vothknecht, M. (2012). Migration as cause and consequence of aspirations DEMIG project paper 13. Oxford: IMI Working Papers Series.Google Scholar
  19. De Haas, H. (2008a). Migration and development. A theoretical perspective. IMI working paper no. 9. Oxford: IMI. https://www.imi.ox.ac.uk/pdfs/wp/wp-09-08.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016.
  20. De Haas, H. (2008b). The myth of invasion: The inconvenient realities of African migration to Europe. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1305–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Haas, H. (2010). Migration transitions: A theoretical and empirical inquiry into the developmental drivers of international migration, DEMIG, working paper no. 24, International Migration Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. De Haas, H. (2011). The determinants of international migration. Conceptualising policy, origin and destination effects DEMIG project paper 2. Oxford: IMI Working Papers Series.Google Scholar
  23. DHS. (2015). The DHS program. Tool and resources. Resource document. http://www.dhsprogram.com/. Accessed Nov 2016.
  24. EIGE—European Institute for Gender Equality. (2013a). Female genital mutilation in the European Union and Croatia Vilnius: EIGE.Google Scholar
  25. EIGE—European Institute for Gender Equality. (2013b). Good practices in combating female genital mutilation Vilnius: EIGE.Google Scholar
  26. EIGE—European Institute for Gender Equality. (2015). Estimation of girls at risk of female genital mutilation in the European Union: EIGE.Google Scholar
  27. European Parliament. (2014). European parliament resolution of 6 February 2014 on the commission communication entitled ‘Towards the elimination of female genital mutilation’. Resource document. European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2014-0105&language=EN#def_1_10. Accessed Nov 2016.
  28. Eurostat. (2017). Database. Internet resource. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed 6 Sep 2017.
  29. Fargues, P. (2008). Emerging demographic patterns across the mediterranean and their implications for migration through 2030. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Fargues, P. (2011). International migration and the demographic transition: A two-way interaction. International Migration Review, 45, 588–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Farina, P., & Ortensi, L. E. (2014). The mother to daughter transmission of female genital cutting in emigration as evidenced by Italian survey data. Genus, 70(2–3), 111–137.Google Scholar
  32. Fassmann, H. (2014). Estimating migration potential: Egypt, Morocco and Turkey. In M. Bommes, H. Fassmannn, & W. Sievers (Eds.), Migration from the Middle East and North Africa to Europe. Past developments, current status and future potentials. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Fassmann, H., & Sievers, W. (2014). Introduction. In M. Bommes, H. Fassmannn, & W. Sievers (Eds.), Migration from the Middle East and North Africa to Europe. Past developments, current status and future potentials. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Flahaux, M.-L., & De Haas, H. (2016). African migration: Trends, patterns, drivers. Comparative Migration Studies, 4, 1. doi:10.1186/s40878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fleury, A. (2016). Understanding women and migration: A literature review. KNOMAD working paper 8. New York: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Foldès, P., Cuzin, B., & Andro, A. (2012). Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet, 380, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilardoni, G., D’Odorico, M., & Carrrillo, D. (2015). KING. Knowledge for INtegration governance. Evidence on migrants’ integration in Europe. Milan: ISMU.Google Scholar
  38. Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (2003). Demographic and economic pressure on emigration out of Africa. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105, 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hugo, G. (2007). Indonesia’s labor looks abroad. MPI—Migration Information Source. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/indonesias-labor-looks-abroad. Accessed Nov 2016.
  40. IMI [International Migration Institute], & RMMS [Regional Mixed Migration Secretariat]. (2012). Global migration futures. Using scenarios to explore future migration in the Horn of Africa and Yemen. Project report. November 2012. Oxford & Nairobi: IMI & RMMS. https://www.imi.ox.ac.uk/publications/global-migration-futures-using-scenarios-to-explore-future-migration-in-the-horn-of-africa-yemen. Accessed Nov 2016.
  41. IOM. (2014). Supporting the abandonment of female genital mutilation in the context of migration. Geneva: IOM.Google Scholar
  42. ISMU. (2015). KING—Knowledge for INtegration governance. Resource document. ISMU. http://king.ismu.org/. Accessed Nov 2016.
  43. Jamie, F. O. M. (2013). Gender and migration in Africa: Female Ethiopian migration in post-2008. Sudan Journal of Politics and Law, 6(1), 186–192.Google Scholar
  44. Johnsdotter, S., Kontiemoussa, A. R., & Essen, B. (2009). Never my daughters’: A qualitative study regarding attitude change toward female genital cutting among Ethiopian and Eritrean families in Sweden. Health Care Women International, 30(1–2), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson, K., Grant, M., Khan, S., Moore, Z., Armstrong, A., & Sa, Z. (2009). Fieldwork-related factors and data quality in the demographic and health surveys program., DHS analytical studies no. 19 Calverton: ICF Macro.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan-Marcusan, A., Torán-Monserrat, P., Moreno-Navarro, J., Castany Fàbregas, M. J., & Muñoz-Ortiz, L. (2009). Perception of primary health professionals about female genital mutilation: From healthcare to intercultural competence. BMC Health Services Research, 9, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leye, E., Mergaert, L., Arnaut, C., & O’Brien Green, S. (2014). Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: Interpreting existing evidence in all EU member states. Genus, LXX(1), 99–121.Google Scholar
  48. Leye, E., Powell, R. A., Nienhuis, G., Claeys, P., & Temmerman, M. (2006). Health care in Europe for women with genital mutilation. Health Care for Women International, 27, 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leye, E., Ysebaert, I., Deblonde, J., Claeys, P., Vermeulen, G., Jacquemyn, Y., et al. (2008). Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 13(2), 182–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindstrom, D. P., & Ramírez, A. (2010). Pioneers and followers: Migrant selectivity and the development of US migration streams in latin America. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lucas, R. E. B. (2006). Migration and economic development in Africa: A review of evidence. Journal of African Economies, volume 15, AERC supplement, 2, 337–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mackie, G., & Lejeune, J. (2009). Social dynamics of abandonment of harmful practices: A new look at the theory. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Martin, P. L. (2009). Demographic and economic trends: Implications for international mobility. Human development research paper 2009/19 UNDP.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, P. L., & Taylor, J. E. (1996). The anatomy of a migration hump. In J. E. Taylor (Ed.), Development strategy, employment, and migration: Insights from models (pp. 43–62). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  55. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2005). Worlds in motion. Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  56. McArthur, J. W. (2014). Pushing the employment frontiers for Africa’s rural and urban youth in Brookings Africa growth initiative-foresight Africa. Top priorities for the continent in 2014. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  57. McKenzie, D., & Rapoport, H. (2010). Self-selection patterns in Mexico-US migration: The role of migration networks. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(4), 811–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morison, L., Dirir, A., Elmi, S., Warsame, J., & Dirir, S. (2004). How experience and attitudes relating to female circumcision vary according to age on arrival in Britain: A study among young Somalis in London. Ethnicity and Health, 9(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mukherjee, A. (2014). Female genital mutilation in Egypt (Compared to Burkina Faso) scholarly horizons: University of Minnesota. Morris Undergraduate Journal, 1(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  60. Naudé, W. (2010). The determinants of migration from Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of African Economies, 19(3), 330–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. NRC [National Research Council]. (2000). Beyond six billion. Forecasting the world’s population. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  62. Nyberg–Sørensen, N., Van Hear, N., & Engberg-Pedersen, P. (2002). The migration-development nexus evidence and policy options state-of-the-art overview. International Migration, 40(5), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD. (2009). The future of international migration to OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. O’Neill, B. C., Balk, D., Brickman, M., & Ezra, M. (2001). A guide to global population projections. Demographic Research, 4, 203–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Orchid Project. (2012). Female genital cutting in Egypt. Resource document. The orchid project. http://orchidproject.org/female-genital-cutting-in-egypt/. Accessed Nov 2016.
  66. Ortensi, L. E., Farina, P., & Menonna, A. (2015). Improving estimates of the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among migrants in Western countries. Demographic Research, 32, 543–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Page, J. (2012). Youth, jobs, and structural change: Confronting Africa’s “Employment Problem”. African Development Bank Group working paper series no. 155. Tunis: African Development Bank.Google Scholar
  68. Powell, R. A., Leye, E., Jayakody, A., Mwangi-Powell, F. N., & Morison, L. (2004). Female genital mutilation, asylum seekers and refugees: The need for an integrated European Union agenda. Health Policy, 70, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. PRB—Population Reference Bureau. (2001). Understanding and using population projections. Measure communication policy brief. Resource document. PRB. http://www.prb.org/pdf/UnderStndPopProj_Eng.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016.
  70. PRB—Population Reference Bureau. (2009). Population reference bureau: World population data sheet 2009. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau Website.Google Scholar
  71. Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S., Özden, C., Plaza, S., Shaw, W., & Shimeles, A. (2011). Leveraging migration for Africa remittances, skills, and investments. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Raymer, J., & Rogers, A. (2008). Applying model migration schedules to represent age-specific migration flows. In J. Raymer & F. Willekens (Eds.), International migration in Europe. Data, models and estimates. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Reig-Alcaraz, M., Siles-González, J., & Solano-Ruiz, C. (2016). A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to female genital mutilation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reynolds, R. R. (2006). Professional Nigerian women, household economy, and immigration decisions. International, 44(5), 167–188.Google Scholar
  75. Rogers, A., & Castro, L. (1981). Age patterns of migration: Cause-specific profiles. In A. Rogers (Ed.), Advances in multiregional demography (pp. 125–159). Luxemburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  76. Schoumaker, B., Flahaux, M. L., Schans, D., Beauchemin, C., Mazzucato, V., & Sakho, P. (2015). Changing patterns of African Migration: A comparative analysis. In C. Beauchemin (Ed.), Migration between Africa and Europe: Trends, factors and effects. New-York: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Shaw, W. (2007). Migration in Africa: A Review of the economic literature on international migration in 10 countries. Development prospects group. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  78. Spadavecchia, C. (2013). Migration from Sub-Saharan Africa to Europe: The role of highly skilled women. Sociología y tecnociencia/Sociology and Technoscience, 3(3), 96–116.Google Scholar
  79. Sudan Federal Ministry of Health and Central Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Sudan household and health survey. National report. Khartoum: Federal Ministry of Health and Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  80. Surico, D., Amadori, R., Gastaldo, L. B., Tinelli, R., & Surico, N. (2015). Female genital cutting: A survey among healthcare professionals in Italy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35(4), 393–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thomas, K. J. A., & Logan, I. (2012). African female immigration to the United States and its policy implications. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 46(1), 87–107.Google Scholar
  82. UNFPA. (2015). Demographic perspectives on female genital mutilation. New York: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  83. UNHCR. (2014). Too much pain: Female genital mutilation & asylum in the European union—A statistical update. Internet resource. UNHCR. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5316e6db4.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016.
  84. UNICEF. (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).Google Scholar
  85. UNICEF. (2014a). Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS). Statistics and monitoring. Resource document. UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/statistics/index_24302.html. Accessed 24 Sep 2015. Accessed Nov 2016.
  86. UNICEF. (2014b). Female genital mutilations/cutting: what might the future hold?. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).Google Scholar
  87. UNICEF. (2016). Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).Google Scholar
  88. Union, African. (2011). Decisions adopted during the 17th African Union Summit, 23 June–1 July 2011. Malabo: African Union.Google Scholar
  89. Van Baelen, L., Ortensi, L. E., & Leye, E. (2016). Estimates of first-generation women and girls with female genital mutilation in the European Union, Norway and Switzerland. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care. doi:10.1080/13625187.2016.1234597.Google Scholar
  90. Vogler, M., & Rotte, R. (2000). The effects of development on migration: Theoretical Issues and new empirical evidence. Journal of Population Economics, 13, 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. WHO. (2008). Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. New York: WHO.Google Scholar
  92. Wouterse, F., & van den Berg, M. (2011). Heterogeneous migration flows from the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso: The role of natural and social capital. The Geographical Journal, 177(4), 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yaro, J. A. (2008). Migration in West Africa: Patterns, issues and challenges. Centre for Migration Studies. Legon: University of Ghana.Google Scholar
  94. Yoder, P. S., & Shanxiao, W. (2013). Female genital cutting: The interpretation of recent DHS sata. DHS comparative reports no. 33. Calverton: ICF International.Google Scholar
  95. Yoder, P. S., Wangs, S., & Johansen, E. (2013). Estimates of female genital mutilation/cutting in 27 African Countries and Yemen. Studies in Family Planning, 44(2), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zaidi, N., Khalil, A., Roberts, C., & Browne, M. (2007). Knowledge of female genital mutilation among healthcare professionals. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 27(2), 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zurynski, Y., Sureshkumar, P., Phu, A., & Elliott, E. (2015). Female genital mutilation and cutting: A systematic literature review of health professionals’ knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 15, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social Research Building U7University of Milan – BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.ISMU FoundationMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations