Maternal Repartnering: Does Father Involvement Matter? Evidence from United Kingdom
- 369 Downloads
Maternal repartnering may have benefits for mothers and children. Yet, mothers with coresident children face more difficulty repartnering than other adults. Despite that shared physical custody and father involvement have increased over time, few studies have examined whether nonresidential father involvement and financial support are associated with subsequent maternal repartnering. Using data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, we found a negative relationship between nonresident father involvement and subsequent maternal repartnering among mothers who were neither married nor cohabiting at childbirth. A potential explanation is that these parents may be engaged in fluid and uncertain relationships, and that the ambiguity thereof may discourage maternal repartnering. We found no association between father involvement and maternal repartnering for mothers who were cohabiting with or married to the father at the time of birth. Finally, we found no association between child support (maintenance) receipt and maternal repartnering, regardless of parental relationship status at the birth.
KeywordsSeparation Divorce Repartnering Custody Children Millennium Cohort Study
We thank the Millennium Cohort Study families for their time and cooperation, as well as the MCS team at the Institute of Education. This work was supported in part by the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
This research was partly supported by NICHD Grant Number K01HD054421 (to Berger) and by funding from the Institute for Research on Poverty and the Waisman Center (NICHD Grant Number P30 HD03352) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Berrington, A., & McGowan, T. (eds.). (2014). The changing demography of lone parenthood in the UK. ESRC Centre for Population Change Working Paper Series, 48. Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
- Culliney, M., Haux, T., & McKay, S. (2014). Family structure and poverty in the UK: An evidence and policy review. Report to The Joseph Rowntree Foundation. University of Lincoln, Lincoln. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/14958/.
- Dex, S., & Joshi, H. (2005). Children of the 21st Century: From birth to nine months. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Ermisch, J. (2002). Trying again: Repartnering after dissolution of a union. ISER Working Paper 2002-19. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Furstenberg, F. F., & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1994). Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on micro-data. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
- Kiernan, K. (2004). Cohabitation and divorce across nations and generations. In P. L. Chase-Lansdale, K. Kiernan, & R. Friedman (Eds.), Human development across lives and generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- McIntosh, S., & Steedman, H. (1999). Qualifications in the United Kingdom 1985–1999. London: Londson School of Economics Research Laboratory Data Service.Google Scholar
- Peacey, V., & Hunt, J. (2009). I’m not saying it was easy: Contact problems in separated families. Gingerbread.Google Scholar
- Rowlingson, K., & McKay, S. (1998). The growth of lone parenthood: Diversity and dynamics (Vol. 850). London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
- Ruggeri, K., & Bird, C. E. (2014). Single parents and employment in Europe: Short statistical Report No. 3. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Schnor, C., Pasteels, I., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). Physical custody arrangement and repartnering: Evidence from a policy promoting joint custody. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/298408758_PHYSICAL_CUSTODY_ARRANGEMENT_AND_REPARTNERING_EVIDENCE_FROM_A_POLICY_PROMOTING_JOINT_CUSTODY.
- Shafer, K., & Jensen, T. M. (2013). Remarital chances, choices, and economic consequences: Issues of social and personal welfare. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40, 77–101.Google Scholar
- Theunis, L., Pasteels, I., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). Educational assortative mating after divorce: Persistence or divergence from first marriages? Journal of Family Research, 27(2), 183–202.Google Scholar
- Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Turunen, Jani. (2011). Entering a stepfamily: Children’s experience of family reconstitution in Sweden 1970–2000. Journal of Family Research, 23, 154–172.Google Scholar
- Zabel, Cordula. (2012). Employment characteristics and partnership formation among lone mothers in Russia. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 24, 344–359.Google Scholar