European Journal of Population

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 1–31 | Cite as

Maternal Repartnering: Does Father Involvement Matter? Evidence from United Kingdom



Maternal repartnering may have benefits for mothers and children. Yet, mothers with coresident children face more difficulty repartnering than other adults. Despite that shared physical custody and father involvement have increased over time, few studies have examined whether nonresidential father involvement and financial support are associated with subsequent maternal repartnering. Using data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study, we found a negative relationship between nonresident father involvement and subsequent maternal repartnering among mothers who were neither married nor cohabiting at childbirth. A potential explanation is that these parents may be engaged in fluid and uncertain relationships, and that the ambiguity thereof may discourage maternal repartnering. We found no association between father involvement and maternal repartnering for mothers who were cohabiting with or married to the father at the time of birth. Finally, we found no association between child support (maintenance) receipt and maternal repartnering, regardless of parental relationship status at the birth.


Separation Divorce Repartnering Custody Children Millennium Cohort Study 



We thank the Millennium Cohort Study families for their time and cooperation, as well as the MCS team at the Institute of Education. This work was supported in part by the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.


This research was partly supported by NICHD Grant Number K01HD054421 (to Berger) and by funding from the Institute for Research on Poverty and the Waisman Center (NICHD Grant Number P30 HD03352) at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on the cognitive, social, and emotional well-being of the next generation. The Future of Children, 15(2), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint custody versus sole custody arrangement: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender, W. N. (1994). Joint custody: The option of choice. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, L. M., Brown, P., Joung, E. H., Melli, M. S., & Wimer, L. (2008). The stability of child physical placements following divorce: Descriptive evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. R. (2012). Maternal re-partnering and new-partner fertility: Associations with non-resident father investments in children. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 426–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrington, A., & McGowan, T. (eds.). (2014). The changing demography of lone parenthood in the UK. ESRC Centre for Population Change Working Paper Series, 48. Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Bracke, S., & Schoors, K. J. L. (2013). Gender differences in the probability of post-divorce and the quality of the new match. Available at SSRN: or doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2279498.
  8. Bzostek, S. H., McLanahan, S. S., & Carlson, M. J. (2012). Mothers’ repartnering after a nonmarital birth. Social Forces, 90, 817–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cancian, M., Meyer, D., Brown, P., & Cook, S. (2014). Who gets custody now? Dramatic changes in children’s living arrangements after divorce. Demography, 51(4), 1381–1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cloutier, R., & Jacques, C. (1998). Evolution of residential custody arrangements in separated families: A longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 28, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Culliney, M., Haux, T., & McKay, S. (2014). Family structure and poverty in the UK: An evidence and policy review. Report to The Joseph Rowntree Foundation. University of Lincoln, Lincoln.
  13. de Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2003). Alternative routes in the remarriage market: Competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces, 81, 1459–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewilde, C., & Uunk, W. (2008). Remariage as a way to overcome the Financial Consequences of Divorce—A test of the Economic Need Hypothesis for European Women. European Sociological Review, 24, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dex, S., & Joshi, H. (2005). Children of the 21st Century: From birth to nine months. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  16. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  17. Ermisch, J. (2002). Trying again: Repartnering after dissolution of a union. ISER Working Paper 2002-19. Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  18. Furstenberg, F. F., & Cherlin, A. J. (1991). Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goldscheider, F., & Sassler, S. (2006). Creating stepfamilies: Integrating children into the study of union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hagenaars, A., de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1994). Poverty statistics in the late 1980s: Research based on micro-data. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  21. Hughes, M. E., & Waite, L. J. (2009). Marital biography and health at mid-life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., & Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population, 29, 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jansen, M., Mortelmans, D., & Snoeckx, L. (2009). Repartnering and (re)employment: Strategies to cope with the economic consequences of partnership dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 1271–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jarvis, S., & Jenkins, S. P. (1999). Marital splits and income changes: Evidence from the British household panel survey. Population Studies, 53, 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiernan, K. (2004). Cohabitation and divorce across nations and generations. In P. L. Chase-Lansdale, K. Kiernan, & R. Friedman (Eds.), Human development across lives and generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kline, M., Tschann, J. M., Johnston, J. R., & Wallerstein, J. S. (1989). Children’s adjustment in joint and sole physical custody families. Developmental Psychology, 23, 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Le Bourdais, C., Desrosiers, H., & Laplante, B. (1995). Factors related to union formation among single mothers in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 410–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maccoby, E. E., & Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. McIntosh, S., & Steedman, H. (1999). Qualifications in the United Kingdom 1985–1999. London: Londson School of Economics Research Laboratory Data Service.Google Scholar
  30. McNamee, C. B., Amato, P., & King, V. (2014). Nonresident father involvement with children and divorced women’s likelihood of remarriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2015). Non-resident parent-child contact after marital dissolution and parental repartnering: Evidence from Italy. Demographic Research, 33(40), 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Osborne, C., Berger, L. M., & Magnuson, K. A. (2012). Family structure transitions and changes in maternal resources and well-being. Demography, 49, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panico, L., Bartley, M., Kelly, Y., McMunn, A., & Sacker, A. (2010). Changes in family structure in early childhood in the Millenium Cohort Study. Population Trends, 142, 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peacey, V., & Hunt, J. (2009). I’m not saying it was easy: Contact problems in separated families. Gingerbread.Google Scholar
  36. Pearson, J., & Thoennes, N. (1990). Custody after divorce: Demographic and attitudinal patterns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pevalin, D. J., & Ermisch, J. (2004). Cohabiting unions, repartnering and mental health. Psychological Medicine, 34(8), 1553–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowlingson, K., & McKay, S. (1998). The growth of lone parenthood: Diversity and dynamics (Vol. 850). London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Ruggeri, K., & Bird, C. E. (2014). Single parents and employment in Europe: Short statistical Report No. 3. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  40. Schmiege, C. J., Richards, L. N., & Zvonkovic, A. M. (2001). Remarriage: For love or money? Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 36, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schnor, C., Pasteels, I., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). Physical custody arrangement and repartnering: Evidence from a policy promoting joint custody.
  42. Schoon, I., Jones, E., Cheng, H., & Maughan, B. (2012). Family hardship, family instability, and cognitive development. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(8), 716–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shafer, K., & James, S. L. (2013). Gender and socioeconomic status differences in first and second marriage formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shafer, K., & Jensen, T. M. (2013). Remarital chances, choices, and economic consequences: Issues of social and personal welfare. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 40, 77–101.Google Scholar
  45. Shafer, K., Jensen, T. M., Pace, G. T., & Larson, J. H. (2013). Former spouse ties and postdivorce relationship quality: Relationship effort as a mediator. Journal of Social Service Research, 39, 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spruijt, E., & Duindam, V. (2009). Joint physical custody in the Netherlands and the well-being of Children. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 51, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tach, L., Mincy, R., & Edin, K. (2010). Parenting as a ‘package deal’: Relationships, fertility and nonresident father involvement among unmarried parents. Demography, 47, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Theunis, L., Pasteels, I., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). Educational assortative mating after divorce: Persistence or divergence from first marriages? Journal of Family Research, 27(2), 183–202.Google Scholar
  49. Townsend, N. W. (2002). The package deal: Marriage, work and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Turunen, Jani. (2011). Entering a stepfamily: Children’s experience of family reconstitution in Sweden 1970–2000. Journal of Family Research, 23, 154–172.Google Scholar
  51. Uunk, W. (2004). The economic consequences of divorce for women in the European Union: The impact of welfare state arrangements. European Journal of Population, 20(3), 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zabel, Cordula. (2012). Employment characteristics and partnership formation among lone mothers in Russia. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 24, 344–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research on Poverty and School of Social WorkUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Institut National d’Etudes Demographiques (INED)Paris Cedex 20France

Personalised recommendations