European Journal of Population

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 55–85 | Cite as

Educational Enrolment, Double-Status Positions and the Transition to Motherhood in Hungary

Article

Abstract

It is well known that participation in education is incompatible with the transition to motherhood. However, enrolment is overwhelmingly treated as a single status even though participation in education may be combined with employment—resulting in double-status positions, and the fertility implications of double-status positions are less clear-cut. Relying on normative and economic approaches, we develop original and competing hypotheses regarding the effect of double-status positions on the transition to motherhood. We also speculate on how the post-communist transition and institutional context might influence the hypothesised effects. The hypotheses are tested using event history data from the Hungarian Generations and Gender Survey. We employ event history methods, which take into account the potential endogeneity of employment and enrolment decisions. We find robust evidence that first birth rates are higher among women in double-status positions than among women who are merely enrolled, but that difference is smaller in younger cohorts than in older ones. We also find some evidence that first birth rates are lower in double-status positions than among women who are employed but not enrolled. Our findings suggest that the conflict between participation in education and motherhood is mitigated in double-status positions, especially among members of the oldest cohort. Since double status is prevalent in modern societies, but has different meanings in different contexts according to educational system and welfare state, we argue for future research on this issue.

Keywords

Fertility Transition to motherhood Education Educational expansion Post-communist fertility 

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Spéder, Zs. (2006). Societal transition, policy changes and family formation: Evidence from Hungary. European Journal of Population, 22(2), 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adsera, A. (2004). Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labour market institutions. Journal of Population Economics, 17(1), 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, G. (2000). The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behaviour: Pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s. European Journal of Population, 16(4), 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population, 29(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartus, T., & Roodman, D. (2014). Estimation of multiprocess survival models with cmp The Stata Journal, 14(4), 756–777.Google Scholar
  6. Bartus, T., Murinkó, L., Szalma, I., & Szél, B. (2013). The effect of education on second births in Hungary: A test of the time-squeeze, self-selection and partner-effect hypotheses. Demographic Research, 28(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beerkens, M., Mägli, E., & Lill, L. (2011). University studies as a side job: Causes and consequences of massive student employment in Estonia. Higher Education, 61(6), 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blossfeld, H. P. (1995). Changes in the process of family formation and women’s growing economic independence: A comparison of nine countries. In H. P. Blossfeld (Ed.), The new role of women: Family formation in modern societies (pp. 3–23). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investment or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunello, G., Crivellaro, E., & Rocco, L. (2010). Lost in transition? The returns to education acquired under communism 15 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall. IZA Discussion Papers 5409, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA).Google Scholar
  11. Buchmann, M. C., & Kriesi, I. (2011). Transition to adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darmody, M., & Smith, E. (2008). Full-time students? The growth of employment among higher education students in Ireland. Journal of Education and Work, 21(4), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elder, G., Jr. (1974). Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frejka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 5: Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25(4), 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gustafsson, S. (2001). Optimal age at motherhood. Theoretical and empirical considerations of postponement of maternity in Europe. Journal of Population Economics, 14(2), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoem, J. (1986). The impact of education on modern family-union initiation. European Journal of Population, 2(2), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huinink, J. (1995). Warum noch Familie? Zur Attraktivität von Partnerschaft und Elternschaft in unserer Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Impicciatore, R., & Billari, F. C. (2012). Secularization, union formation practices, and marital stability: Evidence from Italy. European Journal of Population, 28(2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kantorová, V. (2004). Education and entry into motherhood: The Czech Republic during state socialism and the transition period (1970–1997). Demographic Research Special Collection, 3, 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kertesi, G., & Köllő, J. (2002). Economic transformation and the revaluation of human capital—Hungary, 1986–1999. In A. de Grip, J. Van Loo, & K. Mayhew (Eds.), The economics of skills obsolescence: Theoretical innovations and empirical applications (Vol. 21, p. 235). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Research in labour economics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kézdi, G. (2005). Education and labour market success. In K. Fazekas & J. Varga (Eds.). The Hungarian labour market: Review and analysis 2005 (pp 31–37). Budapest: Institute of Economics, HAS and Hungarian Employment Foundation, Budapest. http://econ.core.hu/doc/mt/2005/en/infocus.pdf.
  24. Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F. C., & Ortega, J. A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Korintus, M. (2010). Hungary. In P. Moss (Ed.), International review of leave policies and related research 2010 (pp. 115–141). London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  26. Kornai, J. (1980). Economics of shortage. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  27. Lalive, R., & Zweimüller, J. (2009). How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1363–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lappegard, T., & Ronsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liefbroer, A. C., & Billari, F. C. (2010). Bringing norms back. A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance for understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place, 16(4), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liefbroer, A., & Corijn, M. (1999). Who, what, where and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population, 15(1), 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lucas, S. R., Fucella, P. N., & Berends, M. (2011). A neo-classical education transitions approach: A corrected tale for three cohorts. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(3), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013). The impact of family policies on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, 29(4), 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Makay, Z. (2015). Family support system, childraising, employment. In J. Monostori, P. Őri, Z. Spéder (Eds.), Demographic portrait of Hungary, 2015 (pp. 57–74). Budapest: Hungarian Demographic Research Institute. On-line: http://demografia.hu/en/publicationsonline/index.php/demographicportrait/article/view/885/647.
  34. Makay, Z., & Blaskó, Z. (2012). Family support system—childraising—employment. In P. Őri, Z. S. Spéder (Eds.). Demographic portrait of Hungary 2012 (pp 45–56). Budapest: Demographic Research Institute. On-line: http://demografia.hu/en/publicationsonline/index.php/demographicportrait/article/view/817/274.
  35. Martin-Garcia, C., & Baizan, P. (2006). The impact of the type of education and of educational enrolment on first births. European Sociological Review, 22(3), 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matyisak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2008). Fertility and women’s employment: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Population, 24(4), 363–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer, K. U. (2001). The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies: Life course patterns in advanced societies. In A. E. Woodward & M. Kohli (Eds.), Inclusions and exclusions in European societies (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Mills, M. (2007). Individualization and the life course: Towards a theoretical model and empirical evidence. In C. Howard (Ed.), Contested individualization: Political sociologies of contemporary personhood (pp. 61–79). London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Neels, K. & De Wachter, D. (2010). Postponement and recuperation of Belgian fertility: How are they related to rising female educational attainment? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 8, 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ní Bhrolcháin, M. N., & Beaujouan, E. (2012). Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies, 66(3), 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rindfuss, R.R., & Brewster, K.L. (1996). Childrearing and fertility. Population and Development Review, 22, Supplement: Fertility in the United States: New Patterns, New Theories, 258–289.Google Scholar
  42. Róbert, P., & Saar, E. (2012). Learning and working: The impact of the ‘double status position’ on the labour market entry process of graduates in CEE Countries. European Sociological Review, 28(6), 742–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roodman, D. (2011). Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. The Stata Journal, 11(2), 159–206.Google Scholar
  44. Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sobotka, T. (2002). Ten years of rapid fertility changes in the European post-communist countries. Evidence and interpretation. University of Groningen, Population Research Centre, Working Paper Series 02-1, p. 53.Google Scholar
  46. Sobotka, T. (2011). Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe after 1989: Collapse and gradual recovery. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(2), 246–296.Google Scholar
  47. Spéder, Zs., Kapitány, B., & Neumann, L. (2010). Life-course transitions and the Hungarian employment model before and after the societal transformation. In D. Anxo, G. Bosch, & J. Rubery (Eds.), The welfare state and life transitions (pp. 287–327). Cheltenham—Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  48. Szeleva, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thornton, A., & Philipov, D. (2009). Sweeping changes in marriage, cohabitation and childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New insights from the developmental idealism framework. European Journal of Population, 25(2), 123–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrolment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 762–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2002). Nonmarital childbearing: Influences of education, marriage, and fertility. Demography, 39(2), 311–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vikat, A., Spéder, Zs., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, Ch., Désesquelles, A., et al. (2007). Generation and Gender Survey (GGS), towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research, 17, 389–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wolbers, M. H. J. (2003). Learning and working: double statuses in youth transitions. In W. Müller & M. Gangl (Eds.), Transitions from education to work in Europe (pp. 131–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hungarian Demographic Research InstituteBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Corvinus University BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations