European Journal of Population

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 293–321 | Cite as

Second Unions Now More Stable than First? A Comparison of Separation Risks by Union Order in France

Article

Abstract

The frequency of union dissolutions increased sharply over the past 40 years in Western Europe and North America, resulting in a rapid growth in the number of persons living with a second partner. In studies of the 1980s, primarily conducted within the context of marriage, second partnerships were generally found to be less stable than first unions, but more recent studies provide more conflicting evidence. Taking the example of France, we study whether the relationship between first and second union stability indeed reversed between the 1970s and the 2000s, and how union and individual characteristics contributed to changes over time. The analysis presented here is based on the French Generations and Gender Survey (2005). The article first provides an overview of the differences in marriage, childbearing and breakup behaviours in first and second unions. Second, a piecewise linear model for repeated events is used to compare women’s dissolution risks in first and second unions. The results show that over time, the higher instability of second compared to first unions disappeared. Further, women in second unions adopted unmarried cohabitation as a living arrangement more often across the whole period and were more likely to have stepchildren, which was associated with less stable unions. Taking into account this diversity of family situations, i.e. controlling for family form and children, second unions were more stable than first unions, even during the past. At both union orders, marriage breakup risks tended to stabilise despite a continuing increase in the prevalence of separation, which suggests that cohabitation increasingly acts as a filter for marriage.

Keywords

Separation Divorce Partnerships Marriage Stepchildren Second unions 

References

  1. Aaberge, R., Kravdal, Ø., & Wennemo, T. (1989). Unobserved heterogeneity in models of marriage dissolution. Discussion paper 42. Oslo: Central Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. Aalen, O. O. (1988). Heterogeneity in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 1121–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguirre, B., & Parr, W. (1982). Husbands’ marriage order and the stability of first and second marriages of white and black women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(3), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaujouan, É. (2009). Les séparations au fil des unions. Répétition, apprentissage? In A. Régnier-Loilier (Ed.), Portraits de familles, l’enquête Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles (pp. 113–141). Paris: Ined.Google Scholar
  5. Beaujouan, É. (2011). Second-union fertility in France: Partners’ age and other factors. Population (English Edition), 66(2), 239–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beaujouan, É. (2012). Repartnering in France: The role of gender, age and past fertility. Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaujouan, É., & Ní Bhrolcháin, M. (2011). Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends, 145, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beaujouan, É., & Solaz, A. (2013). Racing against the biological clock? Childbearing and sterility among men and women in second unions in France. European Journal of Population—Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(1), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. The Journal of Political Economy, 85(6), 1141–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blayo, C., & Festy, P. (1976). Les divorces en France: Evolution récente et perspectives. Population (French Edition), 31(3), 617–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breton, D., & Prioux, F. (2009). Observer la situation et l’histoire familiale des enfants. In A. Régnier-Loilier (Ed.), Portraits de familles, l’enquête Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles (pp. 143–162). Paris: Ined.Google Scholar
  12. Caradec, V. (1996). Les formes de la vie conjugale des “jeunes” couples “âgés”. Population (French Edition), 51(4–5), 897–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castro-Martín, T., & Bumpass, L. L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84(3), 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  16. Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1994). Stepfamilies in the United States: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiswick, C. U., & Lehrer, E. L. (1990). On marriage specific human capital: Its role as a determinant of remarriage. Journal of Population Economics, 3(3), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, S. C., & Wilson, B. F. (1994). The relative stability of remarriages. A cohort approach using vital statistics. Family Relations, 43(5), 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coleman, D. A. (1989). The contemporary pattern of remarriage in England and Wales. In E. Grebenik, C. Hohn, & R. Mackensen (Eds.), Later phases of the family cycle: Demographic aspects (pp. 83–119). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Fine, M. A. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(November), 1288–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coppola, L., & Di Cesare, M. (2008). How fertility and union stability interact in shaping new family patterns in Italy and Spain. Demographic Research, 18, 117–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Courgeau, D., & Lelièvre, É. (2001). L’analyse démographique des biographies. In Démographie: analyse et synthèse (pp. 503–517). Paris: Ined.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, K. (2001). Late life widowhood, selfishness and new partnership choices: A gendered perspective. Ageing and Society, 21, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce: A comparison of marriage cohorts in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 561–572. doi:10.1093/esr/jcl010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Guibert-Lantoine, C. (2002). Remise en couple après rupture de la première union. In Vivre plus longtemps, avoir moins d’enfants, quelles implications? Actes du 10e colloque international de l’AIDELF (pp. 217–229). Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  26. De Jong Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: Partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(February), 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dewilde, C., & Uunk, W. (2008). Remarriage as a way to overcome the financial consequences of divorce—A test of the economic need hypothesis for European women. European Sociological Review, 24(3), 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erlangsen, A., & Andersson, G. (2001). The impact of children on divorce risks in first and later marriages. MPIDR working paper. Rostock: Max-Planck-Institut für demografische Forschung.Google Scholar
  29. Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furstenberg, F. F., & Spanier, G. B. (1984). The risk of dissolution in remarriage: An examination of Cherlin’s hypothesis of incomplete institutionalization. Family Relations, 33(3), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gelissen, J. (2004). Assortative mating after divorce: A test of two competing hypotheses using marginal models. Social Science Research, 33(3), 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haskey, J. (1992). Patterns of marriage divorce and cohabitation in the different countries of Europe. Population Trends, 69, 27–36.Google Scholar
  33. Haskey, J. (1995). Trends in marriage and cohabitation: The decline in marriage and the changing pattern of living in partnerships. Population Trends, 80, 5–15.Google Scholar
  34. Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1214–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hewitt, B., & De Vaus, D. (2009). Change in the association between premarital cohabitation and separation, Australia 1945–2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(2), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C., & Poortman, A.-R. (2014). Understanding diversity in the meaning of cohabitation across Europe. European Journal of Population—Revue Européenne de Démographie, 30(4), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hiekel, N., Liefbroer, A. C., & Poortman, A.-R. (2015). Marriage and separation risks among German cohabiters: Differences between types of cohabiters. Population Studies, 69(2), 237–251. doi:10.1080/00324728.2015.1037334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ivanova, K., Kalmijn, M., & Uunk, W. (2013). The effect of children on men’s and women’s chances of re-partnering in a European context. European Journal of Population—Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(4), 417–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jalovaara, M. (2013). Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. European Journal of Population—Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(2), 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jamieson, L., Wasoff, F., & Simpson, R. (2009). Solo-living, demographic and family change: The need to know more about men. Sociological Research Online, 14(2–3). http://socresonline.org.uk/14/2/5.html.
  41. Kalmijn, M., De Graaf, P. M., & Janssen, J. P. G. (2005). Intermarriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands: The effects of differences in religion and nationality, 1974–94. Population Studies, 59(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kennedy, S., & Ruggles, S. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51, 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kiernan, K. E. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kulu, H. (2014). Marriage duration and divorce: The seven-year itch or a lifelong itch? Demography, 51(3), 881–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Le Gall, D., & Martin, C. (1993). Transitions familiales, logiques de recomposition et modes de régulation conjugale. In Les recompositions familiales aujourd’hui (pp. 137–158). Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
  46. Lehrer, E. L., & Chen, Y. (2013). Delayed entry into first marriage and marital stability. Demographic Research, 29, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lesthaeghe, R. J. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70(4), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2), 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liefbroer, A. C., Poortman, A.-R., & Seltzer, J. A. (2015). Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe. Demographic Research, 32(8), 251–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lillard, L. A., Brien, M. J., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: A matter of self-selection? Demography, 32(3), 437–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lyngstad, T. H., & Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research, 23, 257–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martin, V., Le Bourdais, C., & Lapierre-Adamcyk, E. (2011). Stepfamily instability in Canada—The impact of family composition and union type. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 23(2), 196–218.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, C., & Théry, I. (2001). The PACS and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 14(3), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Matysiak, A., Styrc, M., & Vignoli, D. (2013). The educational gradient in marital disruption: A meta-analysis of European research findings. Population Studies, 68(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mazuy, M., Barbieri, M., & D’Albis, H. (2014). Recent demographic trends in France: The number of marriages continues to decrease. Population (English Edition), 69(3), 313–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCarthy, J. (1978). A comparison of the probability of the dissolution of first and second marriages. Demography, 15(3), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milewski, N., & Kulu, H. (2014). Mixed marriages in Germany: A high risk of divorce for immigrant-native couples. European Journal of Population—Revue européenne de Démographie, 30(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neels, K., Vermant, G., & De Winter, T. (2011). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. In GGP user conference. Budapest.Google Scholar
  61. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parisi, L. (2009). The hazards of partnership dissolution in Britain: A comparison of second and first marriages. Spring Meeting of young economists, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  63. Poortman, A.-R., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2007). Dissolution risks in first and higher order marital and cohabiting unions. Social Science Research, 36(4), 1431–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Prioux, F. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage and separation: contrasts in Europe. Population and Societies, 422.Google Scholar
  65. Prioux, F. (2009). Les couples non mariés en 2005: Quelles différences avec les couples mariés ? Politiques Sociales et Familiales, 96, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prioux, F., & Barbieri, M. (2012). Recent demographic developments in France: Relatively low mortality at advanced ages. Population, 67(4), 493–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rault, W., & Régnier-Loilier, A. (2015). First cohabiting relationships: Recent trends in France. Population & Societies, 521.Google Scholar
  68. Régnier-Loilier, A. (2006). Présentation, questionnaire et documentation de l’ “Etude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles” (ERFI): Version française de l’enquête “Generations and gender survey” (GGS). Documents de travail de l’Ined, 133.Google Scholar
  69. Régnier-Loilier, A., Beaujouan, É., & Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (2009). Neither single, nor in a couple. A study of living apart together in France. Demographic Research, 21, 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Régnier-Loilier, A., & Prioux, F. (2009). Comportements familiaux et pratique religieuse en France. In A. Régnier-Loilier (Ed.), Portraits de familles, l’enquête Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles (pp. 397–421). Paris: Ined.Google Scholar
  71. Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography, 47(3), 719–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reneflot, A. (2006). A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabitating couples. Demographic Research, 15, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Safi, M. (2008). Intermarriage and assimilation: Disparities in levels of exogamy among immigrants in France. Population (English Edition), 63(2), 239–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sardon, J.-P. (2005). L’évolution du divorce en France. In La population de la France: évolutions démographiques depuis 1946 (Vol. 2, pp. 217–252). Pessac: CUDEP.Google Scholar
  75. Sardon, J.-P. (2006). Évolution Démographique Récente Des Pays Développés. Population, 61(3), 227–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schaller, J. (2013). For richer, if not for poorer? Marriage and divorce over the business cycle. Journal of Population Economics, 26(3), 1007–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schnor, C. (2015). Does waiting pay off for couples? Demographic Research, 33(September), 611–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schoen, R. (1992). First unions and the stability of first marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(2), 281–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demographic Research, 19(Special Collection 7), 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Solaz, A. (2001). Formation, devenir et organisation des couples confronteś au chômage. Doctoral dissertation. University Paris 10.Google Scholar
  81. Spanier, G. B., & Furstenberg, F. F. (1982). Remarriage after divorce: A longitudinal analysis of well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44(3), 709–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Steele, F., Kallis, C., & Joshi, H. (2006). The formation and outcomes of cohabiting and marital partnerships in early adulthood: The role of previous partnership experience. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 169(4), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Teachman, J. D. (2008). Complex life course patterns and the risk of divorce in second marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70(2), 294–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Theunis, L., Pasteels, I., & Bavel, J. Van. (2015). Educational assortative mating after divorce. Persistence or divergence from patterns in first marriages? Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 27, 183–202.Google Scholar
  85. Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., Spielauer, M., & Prskawetz, A. (2012). Union instability as an engine of fertility? A microsimulation model for France. Demography, 49(1), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Toulemon, L. (1995). The place of children in the history of couples. Population an English Selection, 7, 163–186.Google Scholar
  87. Toulemon, L. (1997). Cohabitation is here to stay. Population an English Selection, 9, 11–46.Google Scholar
  88. Van Bavel, J. (2012). The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 10, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Van Bavel, J., Jansen, M., & Wijckmans, B. (2012). Has divorce become a pro-natal force in Europe at the turn of the 21st century? Population Research and Policy Review, 31(5), 751–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vanassche, S., Corijn, M., & Matthijs, K. (2015). Post-divorce family trajectories of men and women in Flanders. Demographic Research, 32(May), 859–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. I. (1985). Heterogeneity’s ruses: Some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. The American Statistician, 39(3), 176–185.Google Scholar
  92. Vermunt, J. K. (1996). Log-linear event history analysis: A general approach with missing data, latent variables, and unobserved heterogeneity. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Vikat, A., Spéder, Z., Beets, G., Billari, F. C., Bühler, C., Désesquelles, A., et al. (2007). Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a better understanding of relationships and processes in the life course. Demographic Research, 17, 389–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vikat, A., Thomson, E., & Hoem, J. M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies, 53(2), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Villeneuve-Gokalp, C. (1991). Du premier au deuxième couple: les différences de comportement conjugal entre hommes et femmes. In La nuptialité: évolution récente en France et dans les pays développés. Actes du IXe Colloque National de Démographie (pp. 181–192). Paris.Google Scholar
  96. Wagner, M., & Weiss, B. (2006). On the variation of divorce risks in Europe: Findings from a meta-analysis of European Longitudinal Studies. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. White, L., & Booth, A. (1985). The quality and stability of remarriages: The role of stepchildren. American Sociological Review, 50(5), 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Human CapitalVienna Institute of Demography/Austrian Academy of SciencesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations