European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 77–102 | Cite as

Is There a North–South Divide in Integration Outcomes? A Comparison of the Integration Outcomes of Immigrants in Southern and Northern Europe

  • Hector Cebolla-BoadoEmail author
  • Claudia Finotelli


Integration models are often viewed as a necessary tool for framing integration policies, and for measuring integration efficiency. While “old” European immigration countries in Europe account for a systematic framework of integration policies embedded in a given integration philosophy, new immigration countries (particularly Italy, Greece, Portugal and Spain) have lacked a coherent set of integration policies and practices and, it goes without saying, a philosophical approach to integration. This vacuum has often been seen as a source of marginalization and ‘differential exclusion’, suggesting the existence of a North–South divide in integration matters, and more importantly, outcomes. However, there is still a striking lack of appropriate comparative empirical evidence backing or dismissing this divide. The objective of this article is to explore national-level differences in the real performance of immigrants in selected European countries of immigration along key indicators of integration outcomes, including school attainment and labor market participation. We here discuss the position of Italy, Spain, Greece and Portugal as a coherent cluster of countries and compare the performance of their migrants with that of other foreign-born workers settled in the West of Europe. Our evidence provides little support for the idea that the Southern countries are a unique cluster and that they homogeneously lag behind in terms of integration outcomes.


Integration policies Education Literacy Labor market Unemployment Southern Europe 


  1. Arango, J., & Baldwin-Edwards, M. (Eds.). (2000) Immigrants and the informal economy in Southern Europe. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  2. Altinok, N., & Murseli, H. (2007). International database on human capital quality. Economics Letters, 96(2), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banton, M. (2001). National integration in France and Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernardi, F., Garrido, L., & Miyar, M. (2011). The recent fast upsurge of immigrants in Spain and their employment patterns and occupational attainment. International Migration, 49(1), 148–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in Western society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Calavita, K. (2005). Immigrants at the margins: Law, race, and exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calavita, K. (2007). Law, immigration and exclusion in Italy and Spain. Papers, 85, 95–108.Google Scholar
  8. Caponio, T., & Borckert, M. (2010). The local dimension of migration policymaking. Amsterdam: AUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carling, J. (2007). Migration control and migrant fatalities at the Spanish-African borders, International Migration Review, 41(2), 316–343.Google Scholar
  10. Cebolla-Boado, H. (2011). Primary and Secondary effects in the explanation of immigrant’s educational disadvantage. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(3), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cebolla-Boado, H., & Finotelli, C. (2011). Integration beyond models: An empirical outlook to the impact of integration models. In Estudios = Working papers/Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones, Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales 2011/264. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales.Google Scholar
  12. Cheung, S.-Y., & Heath, A. (2007). Nice work if you can get it: Ethnic penalties in Great Britain. In A. Heath & S. Cheung (Eds.), Unequal chances: Ethnic minorities in western labour markets (pp. 505–548). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, K. (1988). Social sciences approaches to international migration. Population and Development Review, 14, 245–261.Google Scholar
  14. De los Reyes, P., & Kamali, M. (2005). Bortom Vi och Dom: Teoretiska reflektioner om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering. Rapport av Utredningen om makt, integration och strukturell diskriminering. Stockholm: SOU.Google Scholar
  15. Ersanilli, E., & Koopmans, R. (2011). Do immigrant integration policies matter? A three country comparison among Turkish immigrants. West European Politics, 34(2), 208–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fanning, B., & Mutwarasibo, F. (2007). Nationals/non-nationals. Immigration, citizenship and politics in the Republic of Ireland. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(3), 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Favell, A. (2003). Integration nations: The nation-state and research on immigrants in Western Europe in the multicultural challenge. Comparative Social Research, 22, 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finotelli, C. (2009). The North–South myth revised: A comparison of the Italian and German migration Regimes. West European Politics, 32(5), 886–903. Google Scholar
  19. Finotelli, C., & Michalowski, I. (2012). The heuristic potential of Models of Citizenship and Immigrant Integration Reviewed. Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 10(3), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleischmann, F., & Dronkers, J. (2010). Unemployment among immigrants in European labour markets: An analysis of origin and destination effects. Work, Employment and Society, 26, 396–411.Google Scholar
  21. Freemann, G. (2004). Immigrant incorporation in Western democracies. International Migration Review, 38(3), 945–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedrich, L., & Waibel, W. (2013). Local integration concepts in Germany—Diffusion of an integration model? Imis Beiträge, 41, 53–72.Google Scholar
  23. Fullin, G., & Reyneri, E. (2011). Low unemployment and bad jobs for new immigrants in Italy. International Migration, 49(1), 118–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagelund, A. (2002). Problematizing culture: Discourses on integration in Norway. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 3(3–4), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagelund, A., & Brochmann, G. (2010). From rights to duties? Welfare and citizenship for immigrants and refugees in Scandinavia. In P. Baert, S. Koniordos, G. Procacci, & C. Ruzza (Eds.), Conflict, citizenship and civil society. London: Routledge/ESA Studies in European Societies.Google Scholar
  26. Heath, A., & Birnbaum, Y. (Eds.). (2007). The new second generation. Ethnicities, 7(special issue).Google Scholar
  27. Heath, A., & Cheung, S. (2007). Unequal chances: Ethnic minorities in western labour markets (hardback). Series: Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: British Academy/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Heath, A. F., Rothon, C., & Kilpi, E. (2008). The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 211–235.Google Scholar
  29. Holm, G., & Lunde, M. (2010). The discourse on multicultural education in Finland: Education for whom? Intercultural Education, 21(2), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen, T. G. (2008). To be ‘Danish’, becoming ‘Muslim’: Contestations of national identity? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(3), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonsson, J. O., & Rudolphi, F. (2011). Weak performance—Strong determination. School achievement and educational choice among children of immigrants in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 27, 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joppke, C. (2005). Selecting by origin. Ethnic migration in the liberal state. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Joppke, C. (2007). Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Joppke, C. (2009). Limits of integration policy: Britain and her Muslims. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(3), 453–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kestila, E. (2006). Is there demand for radical right populism in the Finnish electorate? Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(3), 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King, R., Lazaridis, G., & Tsardanidis, C. (Eds.). (2000). Eldorado or Fortress? Migration in South Europe. Basingstoke: McMillan.Google Scholar
  37. Koopmans, R. (2008). Tradeoffs between equality and difference immigrant integration, multiculturalism, and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Berlin: Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB discussion paper; SP IV 2008–701).
  38. Koopmans, R. (2010). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koopmans, R., Michalowski, I., & Waibel, S. (2012). Citizenship rights for immigrants. National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 1202–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship. Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, J., & Barro, R. J. (2001). Schooling quality in a cross-section of countries. Economica, 68(272), 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loobuyck, P., & Jacobs, D. (2009). Migration and integration policy in Belgium and Flanders in Belgian society and politics 2009—The diversity challenge for the left. Annual Review, 3, 19–27.Google Scholar
  43. Marks, G. N. (2005). Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(5), 925–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Massey, D. S. (1999). International migration at the dawn of the Twenty-first Century: The role of the state. Population and Development Review, 25(2), 303–322.Google Scholar
  45. Monzini, P., Pastore, F., & Sciortino, G. (2006). Schengen’s soft underbelly? Irregular migration and human smuggling across land and sea borders to Italy. International Migration, 44(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  46. OECD Education Ministerial Meeting. (2010). Tackling the effects of the crisis on education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  47. Peixoto, J., Arango, J., Bonifazi, C., Finotelli, C., Sabino, C., Strozza, S., et al. (2012). The southern European model of immigration. In M. Okolski (Ed.), European immigration. Trends, structures and policy implications (pp. 149–157). Amsterdam: AUP.Google Scholar
  48. Pitkänen, M., & Kouki, S. (2002). Meeting foreign cultures: A survey of the attitudes of Finnish authorities towards immigrants and immigration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rydgren, J. (2004). Mechanisms of exclusion: Ethnic discrimination in the Swedish labour market. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(4), 697–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stanat, P., & Christensen, G. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed—A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  51. Triandafyllidou, A., & Gropas, R. (2009). Constructing difference: The mosque debates in Greece. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(6), 957–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Mijs, J. J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 407–428. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102538.
  53. Van Den Breemer, R., & Maussen, M. (2012). On the viability of state-church models: Muslim burial and mosque building in France and the Netherlands. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 10(3), 279–298.Google Scholar
  54. van Tubergen, F., Maas, I., & Flaap, H. (2004). The economic incorporation of immigrants in 18 western societies: Origin, destination, and community effects. American Sociological Review, 13, 390–412.Google Scholar
  55. Zapata-Barrero, R. (2010). Managing Diversity in Spanish Society: A practical approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(4), 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zincone, G. (2000). A model of ‘Reasonable Integration’. International Migration Review, 40(1), 104–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Sociología II, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y SociologíaUNEDMadridSpain
  2. 2.Dept. Sociología II, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y SociologíaUCMMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations