Advertisement

European Journal of Population

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

How Migration Affects the Timing of Childbearing: The Transition to a First Birth Among Polish Women in Britain

  • Christiane LübkeEmail author
Article

Abstract

Views differ on how migration affects the timing of childbearing. Whereas migration has long been considered a break in the life course, hindering family formation, this disruption hypothesis has recently been challenged. New findings indicating that there is often an acceleration of childbearing shortly after migration have led to the formulation of the interrelation hypothesis. Examining the childbearing behaviour of Polish women, this study extends previous research by combining information from the countries of origin and of destination. Using retrospective data from Poland (derived from the European Social Survey) and Britain (derived from the Labour Force Survey), discrete-time event history methods are applied to study the transition to a first birth in relation to the timing of migration. The results show that there is a disruption of childbearing prior to migration, as well as an acceleration of fertility in the years immediately following the move.

Keywords

Polish migration Migrant fertility Great Britain Disruption Interrelation Own-child method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Marcel Erlinghagen, Karsten Hank, Thorsten Schneider, the anonymous reviewers, and the editors of the European Journal of Population for their valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., & McDonald, P. (2002). A comparison of fertility patterns of European immigrants in Australia with those in the countries of origin. Genus, 58(1), 53–76.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, G. (2004). Childbearing after migration: Fertility patterns of foreign-born women in Sweden. International Migration Review, 38(2), 747–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, G., & Scott, K. (2005). Labour-market status and first-time parenthood: The experience of immigrant women in Sweden, 1981–97. Population Studies, 59(1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P., Golsch, K., & Rohwer, G. (2007). Event history analysis with Stata. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Boyle, P., Kulu, H., Cooke, T., Gayle, V., & Mulder, C. (2008). Moving and union dissolution. Demography, 45(1), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burrell, K. (2009). Polish migration to the UK in the ‘new’ European Union: After 2004. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, E. D. (1985). The impact of international migration upon the timing of marriage and childbearing. Demography, 22(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, K., & Drinkwater, S. (2008). The labour-market performance of recent migrants. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(3), 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coleman, D. A., & Dubuc, S. (2010). The fertility of ethnic minorities in the UK, 1960s–2006. Population Studies, 64(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, J., Dwyer, P., & Waite, L. (2011). The experiences of accession 8 migrants in England: Motivations, work and agency. International Migration, 49, 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubuc, S. (2009). Application of the own-child method for estimating fertility of women by ethnic groups in the UK. Journal of Population Research, 26, 2007–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Social Survey (2011). ESS-5 2010 Documentation Report.Google Scholar
  14. Eurostat. (2010). Criteria for the anonymisation of LFS microdata. Retrieved from http://circa.europa.eu/irc/dsis/employment/info/data/eu_lfs/LFS_MAIN/Anonymisation/Criteria%20for%20the%20anonymisation.pdf. Accessed July 2013.
  15. Eurostat. (2014). Demographic statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Google Scholar
  16. Ford, K. (1990). Duration of residence in the United States and the fertility of U.S. immigrants. International Migration Review, 24(1), 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, S., & Goldstein, A. (1981). The impact of migration on fertility: An ‘own children’ analysis for Thailand. Population Studies, 35(2), 265–284.Google Scholar
  18. Home Office. (2007). Accession monitoring report A8 countries: May 2004–June 2007. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100422120657/http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/reports/accession_monitoring_report/. Accessed July 2013.
  19. Home Office. (2009). Accession monitoring report A8 countries: May 2004–March 2009. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100422120657/http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/documents/aboutus/reports/accession_monitoring_report/. Accessed July 2013.
  20. Huinink, J., & Feldhaus, M. (2009). Family research from the life course perspective. International Sociology, 24(3), 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kahn, J. R. (1994). Immigrant and native fertility during the 1980s: Adaptation and expectations for the future. International Migration Review, 28(3), 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kley, S. (2011). Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework. European Sociological Review, 27(4), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kotowska, I., Józwiak, J., Matysiak, A., & Baranowska, A. (2008). Poland: Fertility decline as a response to profound societal and labour market changes? Demographic Research, 19, 795–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kulu, H. (2005). Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population, 21(1), 51–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landale, N., & Ogena, N. (1995). Migration and union dissolution among Puerto Rican women. International Migration Review, 45(1), 671–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lindstrom, D. P., & Saucedo, S. G. (2002). The short- and long-term effects of U.S. migration experience on Mexican women’s fertility. Social Forces, 80(4), 1341–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Matysiak, A. (2009). Employment first, then childbearing: Women’s strategy in post-socialist Poland. Population Studies, 63(3), 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Milewski, N. (2007). First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaption? Demographic Research, 17, 859–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Milewski, N. (2010). Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Is there a socialization effect in the transition to second and third births? European Journal of Population, 26, 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulder, C. H., & Wagner, M. (1993). Migration and marriage in the life course: a method for studying synchronized events. European Journal of Population, 9, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ng, E., & Nault, F. (1997). Fertility among recent immigrant women to Canada, 1991: An examination of the disruption hypothesis. International Migration, 35(4), 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Office for National Statistics. (2010). Parents’ country of birth 2009. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/country-of-birth-tables.xls. Accessed July 2013.
  33. Office for National Statistics. (2011). Labour force survey—User guidance: Volume 1: Background and methodology. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/labour-market-statistics/index.html. Accessed July 2013.
  34. Pollard, N., Latorre, M., & Sriskandarajah (2008). Floodgates or turnstiles? Post-EU enlargement migration flows to (and from) the UK. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
  35. Retherford, R. D., & Cho, L.-J. (1978). Age-parity-specific birth rates and birth probabilities from census or survey data on own children. Population Studies, 32(3), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan, L., Sales, R., Tilki, M., & Siara, B. (2009). Family strategies and transnational migration: Recent Polish migrants in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singley, S. G., & Landale, N. S. (1998). Incorporating origin and process in migration-fertility frameworks: The Case of Puerto Rican women. Social Forces, 76(4), 1437–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stephen, E. H., & Bean, F. D. (1992). Assimilation, disruption and the fertility of Mexican-origin women in the United States. International Migration Review, 26(1), 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trevena, P. (2009). ‘New’ Polish migration to the UK: A synthesis of existing evidence. Centre for Population Change Working Paper, 3.Google Scholar
  40. Waller, L., Berrington, A., & Ryamer, J. (2014). New insights into the fertility patterns of recent Polish migrants in the United Kingdom. Journal of Population Research (In Press).Google Scholar
  41. White, A. (2011). Polish families and migration since EU accession. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  42. White, M. J., Moreno, L., & Guo, S. (1995). The interrelation of fertility and geographic mobility in Peru: A hazards model analysis. International Migration Review, 29(2), 492–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolf, K. (2014). Fertility of Turkish migrants in Germany: Duration of stay matters. MPIDR Working Paper WP 2014-001.Google Scholar
  44. Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event history analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany

Personalised recommendations