Family Trajectories and Health: A Life Course Perspective

Article

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of family trajectory, i.e., the whole sequence of family events during the life course of early adults in shaping their health outcomes. Union formation and childbearing are jointly considered, since the two life domains are highly connected and their intersections may have an effect on health outcomes. Data come from wave I and wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) in the United States. The paper is divided in two parts. The first part focuses on family transitions and investigates if changes in timing (when events happen), quantum (what and how many transitions), and ordering (in what order), have an effect on the health of young women. In the second part, life course trajectories are classified into six groups representing different ideal-types of family trajectories and the association of these trajectories with health outcomes is explored. Results suggest that family trajectories play an important role on different health outcomes. Controlling for selection and background characteristics, precocious and “non-normative” transitions are associated with lower self-reported health and higher propensity of smoking and drinking.

Keywords

Sequence analysis Life course analysis Health outcomes Transition to adulthood 

Trajectoires familiales et santé: une approche sous l’angle de parcours de vie

Résumé

Cet article étudie le rôle des trajectoires familiales, i.e., la totalité des séquences d’évènements familiaux survenus au cours de la vie de jeunes adultes, sur l’état de santé de ces derniers. La formation d’union et la procréation sont pris en compte conjointement car ces deux dimensions sont étroitement liées et leurs croisements peuvent avoir un effet sur la santé. Les données sont issues des vagues 1 et 4 de l'enquête longitudinale nationale sur la santé des adolescents (Add Health) réalisée aux Etats-Unis. Cet article est subdivisé en deux parties. La première partie s’intéresse aux transitions familiales et examine si des changements dans le calendrier (quand les événements arrivent-ils), le type et le nombre (quelles transitions et combien) et l’ordre (dans lequel elles surviennent) ont un effet sur la santé des jeunes femmes. Dans la deuxième partie, les trajectoires de vie sont classées en six catégories représentant les idéal-types des trajectoires familiales, et les associations entre ces trajectoires et l’état de santé sont étudiées. Les résultats indiquent que les trajectoires familiales jouent un rôle important sur l’état de santé. En contrôlant les effets de sélection et les caractéristiques individuelles, les transitions précoces et non normatives sont associées à un moins état de santé auto-déclaré et une tendance plus élevée de consommation de tabac et d’alcool.

Mots-clés

Analyse de séquence Analyse de parcours de vie État de santé Transition vers l’âge adulte 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 other federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due to Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis.

References

  1. Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: A sequence analysis of young British women’s work–family trajectories. European Journal of Population, 23(3–4), 369–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence analysis: New methods for old ideas. Annual Review of Sociology, 21(1), 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: Review and prospect. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acs, G. (2007). Can we promote child well-being by promoting marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1326–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison, P. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amato, P. (2007). Strengthening marriage is an appropriate social policy goal. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 952–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amato, P., Landale, N., & Havasevich-Brooks, T. (2008). Precursors of young women’s family formation pathways. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1271–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amato, P. R., & Kane, J. B. (2011). Life course pathways and the psychosocial adjustment of young adult women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(1), 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Barban, N., & Billari, F. (2012). Classifying life course trajectories: A comparison of latent class and sequence analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 61(5), 765–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ben-Shlomo, Y., & Kuh, D. (2002). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: Conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(2), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Billari, F. C. (2001). The analysis of early life courses: Complex descriptions of the transition to adulthood. Journal of Population Research, 18(2), 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Billari, F. C. (2005). Life course analysis: Two (complementary) cultures? Some reflections with examples from the analysis of the transition to adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Billari, F. C., Fürnkranz, J., & Prskawetz, A. (2006). Timing, sequencing, and quantum of life course events: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Population, 22(1), 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bumpass, L., Martin, T., & Sweet, J. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cairney, J., Boyle, M., Offord, D., & Racine, Y. (2003). Stress, social support and depression in single and married mothers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 442–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cherlin, A. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. The Future of Children, 15(2), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duncan, G., Bessie, W., & Paula, E. (2006). Cleaning up their act: The effects of marriage and cohabitation on licit and illicit drug use. Demography, 43(4), 691–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dupre, M. E., Beck, A. N., & Meadows, S. O. (2009). Marital trajectories and mortality among US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170(5), 546–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elder, G. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elder, G. H. (1985). Life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions, 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ Press.Google Scholar
  23. Elzinga, C., & Liefbroer, A. (2007). De-standardization of family–life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population, 23(3), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elzinga, C., Rahmann, S., & Wang, H. (2008). Algorithms for subsequence combinatorics. Theoretical Computer Science, 409(3), 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ermisch, J., & Pevalin, D. (2005). Early motherhood and later partnerships. Journal of Population Economics, 18(3), 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferree, M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 866–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Francesconi, M., Jenkins, S. P., & Siedler, T. (2010). The effect of lone motherhood on the smoking behavior of young adults. Health Economics, 19(11), 1377–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Furstenberg, F. F. (1976). Unplanned parenthood: The social consequences of teenage childbearing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Furstenberg, F. F. (1998). When will teenage childbearing become a problem? The implications of western experience for developing countries. Studies in Family Planning, 29(2), 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). Non-normative life course transitions: Reflections on the significance of demographic events on lives. Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. George, L. K. (2009). Conceptualizing life course trajectories. In G. H. Elder & J. Z. Giele (Eds.), The craft of life course research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Giele, J. Z., & Elder, G. H. (1998). Methods of life course research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Gove, W. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, marital status, and mental illness. Social Forces, 51(1), 34–44.Google Scholar
  34. Halfon, N., & Hochstein, M. (2002). Life course health development: An integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. The Milbank Quarterly, 80(3), 433–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, K. M., & Eileen, B. (2010). An integrative approach to health. Demography, 47(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, K. M., Lee, H., & Deleone, F. (2010). Marriage and health in the transition to adulthood: Evidence for African Americans in the Add Health study. Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1106–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hogan, D. (1978). The variable order of events in the life course. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Horwitz, A., & White, H. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnston, D. (1995). Alternative methods for the quantitative analysis of panel data in family research: Pooled time-series models. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(4), 1065–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koball, H., Moiduddin, E., & Henderson, J. (2010). What do we know about the link between marriage and health? Journal of Family Issues, 31(8), 1019–1040.Google Scholar
  41. Lamb, K., Lee, G., & DeMaris, A. (2003). Union formation and depression: Selection and relationship effects. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(4), 953–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lehrer, E. (1988). Determinants of marital instability: A Cox-regression model. Applied Economics, 20(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lesnard, L. (2006). Setting cost in optimal matching to uncover contemporaneous socio-temporal patterns. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 389–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Levenshtein, V. I. (1965). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady, 10, 707–710.Google Scholar
  45. Lichter, D., Graefe, D., & Brown, J. (2003). Is marriage a panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lillard, L., & Waite, L. (1993). A joint model of marital childbearing and marital disruption. Demography, 30(4), 653–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Macmillan, R. (2005). The structure of the life course: Classic issues and current controversies. Advances in Life Course Research, 9, 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin, T., & Bumpass, L. (1989). Recent trends in marital disruption. Demography, 26(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McLanahan, S. (2007). Should government promote marriage? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 951–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McVicar, D., & Anyadike-Danes, M. (2002). Predicting successful and unsuccessful transitions from school to work by using sequence methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 165(2), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meadows, S. (2009). Family structure and fathers’ well-being: Trajectories of mental health and self-rated health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(2), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miech, R., & Shanahan, M. (2000). Socioeconomic status and depression over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41(2), 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mirowsky, J. (2002). Parenthood and health: The pivotal and optimal age at first birth. Social Forces, 81(1), 315–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mirowsky, J. (2005). Age at first birth, health, and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46(1), 32–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mouw, T. (2005). Sequences of early adult transitions: A look at variability and consequences. In R. Settersten, F. Furstenberg, & R. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage, and trajectories in well-being and relationships. NSFH Working Paper No. 93. Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research, UCLA. Retrieved from http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/34f1h2nt.
  57. Nock, S. (1981). Family life-cycle transitions: Longitudinal effects on family members. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(3), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nock, S. (2005). Marriage as a public issue. The Future of Children, 15(2):13–32. Marriage and Child Wellbeing.Google Scholar
  59. O’Connell, M., & Rogers, C. (1984). Out-of-wedlock births, premarital pregnancies and their effect on family formation and dissolution. Family Planning Perspectives, 16(4), 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Oxford, M., Gilchrist, L., Gillmore, M., & Lohr, M. (2006). Predicting variation in the life course of adolescent mothers as they enter adulthood. J Adolescent Health, 39(1), 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Peters, A., & Liefbroer, A. (1997). Beyond marital status: Partner history and well-being in old age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 687–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Piccarreta, R., & Billari, F. C. (2007). Clustering work and family trajectories by using a divisive algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, 170(4), 1061–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rendall, M. S., Weden, M. M., Favreault, M. M., & Waldron, H. (2011). The protective effect of marriage for survival: A review and update. Demography, 48(2), 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rindfuss, R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rindfuss, R., Swicegood, C., & Rosenfeld, R. (1987). Disorder in the life course: How common and does it matter? American Sociological Review, 52, 785–801.Google Scholar
  67. Schoen, R., Landale, N., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44(4), 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schoenborn, C. (2004). Marital status and health: United States, 1999–2002. Advance data.Google Scholar
  69. Seltzer, J. (2004). Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship, and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 921–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shanahan, M. (2000). Pathways to adulthood in changing societies: Variability and mechanisms in life course perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 667–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Soons, J., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). Is marriage more than cohabitation? Well-Being differences in 30 European countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1141–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Soons, J., Liefbroer, A., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(5), 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teachman, J. (2002). Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors. Demography, 39(2), 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Umberson, D., Pudrovska, T., & Reczek, C. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 612–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2006). You make me sick: Marital quality and health over the life course. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waite, L. J., & Bachrach, C. (2000). The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  77. Waldron, I., Hughes, M., & Brooks, T. (1996). Marriage protection and marriage selection—Prospective evidence for reciprocal effects of marital status and health. Social Science & Medicine, 43(1), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Widmer, E. D., & Ritschard, G. (2009). The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal?. Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1–2), 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams, K., & Umberson, D. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wood, R., Goesling, B., & Avellar, S. (2007). The effects of marriage on health: A synthesis of recent research evidence. Technical report, Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  82. Wu, L. (2000). Some comments on “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect”. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu, Z., & Hart, R. (2002). The effects of marital and nonmarital union transition on health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations