Self-Rated Health in the Baltic Countries, 1994–1999

Santé subjective dans les Pays Baltes, 1994–1999
Article

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the explanations of mortality fluctuations in the former USSR during the last decade of the twentieth century—a time of considerable political and socio-economic changes—but fewer studies have considered the health of these populations during this period. Using individual data from the Norbalt surveys held in 1994 and 1999 in the three Baltic countries, we examine the determinants of self-rated health in the three countries and for the two periods, by way of Bayesian structural equation modelling and directed acyclic graphs. The model takes into account, as possible determinants, alcohol consumption, physical health, psychological distress, education, locus of control, and social support. A major result is the remarkable stability of the model’s parameters whatever the country, year, gender, ethnicity, or age-group. Particular attention is given to the role of alcohol consumption and to the association observed between better self-assessed health and higher drinking.

Keywords

Self-rated health Baltic countries Structural equation modelling Alcohol consumption 

Résumé

De nombreuses études se sont intéressées aux causes possibles des fluctuations de mortalité observées en ex-URSS au cours de la dernière décennie du 20e siècle, période de grands bouleversements politiques et socio-économiques, mais peu se sont penchées sur la santé de ces populations durant cette période. A partir des données individuelles des enquêtes Norbalt qui se sont déroulées en 1994 et 1999 dans les trois pays Baltes, les déterminants de la santé subjective sont examinés dans les trois pays et pour les deux périodes, à l’aide d’un modèle structurel Bayésien à équations multiples et de graphes acycliques dirigés. Les déterminants possibles inclus dans le modèle sont la consommation d’alcool, la santé physique, la détresse psychologique, l’instruction, le locus de contrôle et le soutien social. On constate une remarquable stabilité des paramètres du modèle quels que soient le pays, l’année, le sexe, l’appartenance ethnique ou le groupe d’âge. Le rôle de la consommation d’alcool et l’existence d’une association entre une meilleure santé subjective et une consommation d’alcool plus élevée font l’objet d’une attention particulière.

Mots-clés

Santé subjective pays Baltes modèle structurel à équations multiples consommation d’alcool 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Among others, comments by the Editors, and by Domantas Jasilionis, Peter Jozan, Michel Loriaux and two anonymous reviewers, are gratefully acknowledged. The Norbalt data have been obtained thanks to The Institute for Applied Social Science in Oslo (FAFO).

References

  1. Aasland, A., Behmane, M., Jacobsen, B., Priede, Z., Svarckopfa, A., Vasaraudze, I. (1996). Latvia: The impact of the transformation, The Norbalt Living Conditions Project (Aadne Aasland Ed.). Fafo Report 188, Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  2. Aasland, A., & Tyldum, G. (2002). The Norbalt project: comparative studies of living conditions in the three Baltic countries. Social Indicators Research, 58, 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appels, A., Bosma, H., Grabauskas, V., Gostautas, A., & Sturmans, F. (1996). Self-rated health and mortality in Lithuanian and Dutch population. Social Science and Medicine, 42(5), 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuckle, J. (2006). Amos 7.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SPSS.Google Scholar
  5. Arbuckle, J., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, C., & Bloom, D. (1998). The demographic crisis in the former Soviet Union. World Development. Special Issue: The Demographic Crisis in the Former Soviet Union, 26(11), 1913–1919.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, D., Idson T. (1992). The practical importance of sample weights. 1991 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 620–624. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  8. Bobak, M., & Marmot, M. (1996). East–west mortality divide and its potential explanations: proposed research agenda. British Medical Journal, 312, 421–425.Google Scholar
  9. Bobak, M., Pikhart, H., Rose, R., Hertzman, C., & Marmot, M. (2000). Socioeconomic factors, material inequalities, and perceived control in self-rated health: cross-sectional data from seven post-communist countries. Social Science and Medicine, 51(9), 1343–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brainerd, E. (1998). Market reform and mortality in transition economies. World Development. Special Issue: The Demographic Crisis in the Former Soviet Union, 26(11), 2013–2027.Google Scholar
  11. Brunovskis, A., & Ugland, T. (2003). Alcohol consumption in the Baltic States, Fafo-paper 2003. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  12. Carlson, P. (2004). The European health divide: a matter of financial or social capital? Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1985–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen, L., Wittgenstein, F., & McKeon, E. (1996). The upsurge of mortality in Russia: Causes and policy implications. Population and Development Review, 22(3), 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chenet, L., Britton, A., Kalediene, R., & Petrauskiene, J. (2001). Daily variations in deaths in Lithuania: The possible contribution of binge drinking. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 743–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cockerham, W., Hinote, B., & Abbott, P. (2006a). Psychological distress, gender, and health lifestyles in Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. Social Science and Medicine, 63(9), 2381–2394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cockerham, W., Hinote, B., Cockerham, G., & Abbott, P. (2006b). Health lifestyles and political ideology in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1799–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox, D. R. (1992). Causality: Some statistical aspects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 155(2), 291–301.Google Scholar
  18. Dietz, J., Einasto, M., Flotten, T., Grogaard, J., Jacobsen, B., Kutsar, D., et al. (1996). Estonia in the Grip of Change, (Aadne Aasland Ed.), Fafo Report 190. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  19. Dunson, D., Palomo, J., Bollen, K. (2005). Bayesian structural equation modeling. Technical Report #2005-5. Statistical and Applied Mathematical Sciences Institute, Research Triangle Park.Google Scholar
  20. Feunekes, G. I., van’t Veer, P., van Staveren, W. A., & Kok, F. J. (1999). Alcohol intake assessment: The sober facts. American Journal of Epidemiology, 150(1), 105–112.Google Scholar
  21. Fontaine, O., Kulbertus, H., & Etienne, A.-M. (1996). Stress et cardiologie. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
  22. Gaumé, C. (2009). Les déterminants de la santé subjective dans les pays baltes au cours des années 1990. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
  23. Gourbin, C., & Wunsch, G. (2006). Health, illness and death. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. Wunsch (Eds.), Demography, Analysis and Synthesis, Vol. II (pp. 5–12). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harpham, T., Grant, E., & Thomas, E. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues. Health Policy and Planning, 17(1), 106–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helasoja, V., Lahelma, E., Prättälä, R., Kasmel, A., Klumbiene, J., & Pudule, I. (2006). The sociodemographic patterning of health in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Finland. European Journal of Public Health, 16(1), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Helasoja, V., Lahelma, E., Prättälä, R., Petkeviciene, J., Pudule, I., & Tekkel, M. (2007). The sociodemographic patterning of drinking and binge drinking in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Finland, 1994–2002. BMC Public Health, 7, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hernes, G., & Knudsen, K. (1991). Lithuania living conditions. A sociological study. Fafo Report 129. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  28. Jylhä, M. (2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kasmel, A., Helasoja, V., Lipand, A., Prättälä, R., Klumbiene, J., & Pudule, I. (2004). Association between health behaviour and self-reported health in Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Lithuania. European Journal of Public Health, 14(1), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 78(3), 458–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennedy, B., Kawachi, I., & Brainerd, E. (1998). The role of social capital in the Russian mortality crisis. World development. Special Issue: The Demographic Crisis in the Former Soviet Union, 26(11), 2029–2043.Google Scholar
  32. Kircaldy, B. D., Shephard, R. J., & Furnham, A. F. (2002). The influence of type A behaviour and locus of control upon job satisfaction and occupational health. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(8), 1361–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knudsen, K. (1996). Lithuania in a period of transition. Fafo Report 186. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Structural equation modelling: A bayesian approach. Indianapolis: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leinsalu, M. (2002). Social variation in self-rated health in Estonia: A cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 847–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leinsalu, M., Stirbu, I., Vågerö, D., Kalediene, R., Kovács, K., Wojtyniak, B., et al. (2009). Educational inequalities in mortality in four Eastern European countries: Divergence in trends during the post-communist transition from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(2), 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manor, O., Matthews, S., & Power, C. (2000). Dichotomous or categorical response? Analysing self-rated health and lifetime social class. International Journal of Epidemiology, 29(1), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKee, M., Pomerleau, J., Robertson, A., Pudule, I., Grinberga, D., Kadziauskiene, K., et al. (2000). Alcohol consumption in the Baltic Republics. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(5), 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meng, X.-L. (1994). Posterior predictive p-values. The Annals of Statistics, 22(3), 1142–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meslé, F., Hertrich, V. (1999). The health crisis in the Baltic countries: a common and varied experience. Paper presented at the European Population Conference, 30 August 3 September, 1999, The Hague.Google Scholar
  41. Monden, C. W. S. (2004). Socioeconomic health inequalities in Latvia: A cross-sectional study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 32(3), 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Monden, C. W. S. (2005). Changing social variations in self-assessed health in times of transition? The Baltic States 1994–1999. The European Journal of Public Health, 15(5), 498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mouchart, M., Russo, F., & Wunsch, G. (2009). Structural modelling, exogeneity, and causality. In H. Engelhardt, H. P. Kohler, & A. Prskawetz (Eds.), Causal analysis in population studies: Concepts, methods, applications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. O’Connor, J. S., & Bankauskaite, V. (2008). Public health development in the Baltic countries (1992–2005): From problems to policy. The European Journal of Public Health, 18(6), 586–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poikolainen, K., Vartiainen, E., & Korhonen, J. (1996). Alcohol intake and self-rated health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 144(4), 346–350.Google Scholar
  46. Psillos, S. (2004). A glimpse of the secret connexion: Harmonizing mechanisms with counterfactuals. Perspectives on Science, 12(3), 288–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reitan, T.C. (2000). Does alcohol matter? Public health in Russia and the Baltic countries before, during, and after the transition. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27/Fall, 511–560.Google Scholar
  48. Scheines, R., Hoijtink, H., & Boomsma, A. (1999). Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models. Psychometrika, 64(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shapiro, J. (1997). The hypothesis of stress as a leading explanatory variable, International Population Conference/Congrès International de la Population: Beijing, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population [IUSSP], pp. 529–553. Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
  50. Shkolnikov, V., Cornia, G., Leon, D., & Meslé, F. (1998). Causes of the Russian mortality crisis: evidence and interpretations. World development. Special Issue: The Demographic Crisis in the Former Soviet Union, 26(11), 1995–2011.Google Scholar
  51. Shumaker, S., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 11–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, A. M. A., Shelley, J. M., & Dennerstein, L. (1994). Self-rated health: Biological continuum or social discontinuity? Social Science and Medicine, 39(1), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spector, P. (1992). Sumated rating scale construction. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Stankaitis, J. A. (1982). Heart disease in the Baltic States: A perspective. Lithuanian Quarterly Journal of Arts and Sciences, 28(4), 5–11.Google Scholar
  55. Stankuniene, V., Jasilionis, D., & Krumins, J. (1999). Social differences in mortality, morbidity, and health-related behaviour during transition: Research findings in the three Baltic countries. Revue Baltique, 14, 9–36.Google Scholar
  56. Vågerö, D. (2010). The east–west health divide in Europe: Growing and shifting eastwards. European Review, 18(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walberg, P., McKee, M., Shkolnikov, V., Chenet, L., & Leon, D. (1998). Economic change, crime, and mortality crisis in Russia: Regional analysis. British Medical Journal, 317, 312–318.Google Scholar
  58. WHO. (1958). The first ten years. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  59. Wunsch, G., Russo, F., & Mouchart, M. (2010). Do we necessarily need longitudinal data to infer causal relations? Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 106(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  60. Zvidriņs, P., & Krumiņs, J. (1993). Morbidity and mortality in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 1980’s. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 21(3), 150–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DemographyUniversity of LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium

Personalised recommendations