Religion, Religiousness and Fertility in the US and in Europe

Religion, religiosité et fécondité aux Etats-Unis et en Europe
Article

Abstract

This article aims to assess the role of religion and religiousness in engendering higher US fertility compared to Europe. Religion is important in the life of one-half of US women, whereas not even for one of six Europeans. By every available measure, American women are more religious than European women. Catholic and Protestant women have notably higher fertility than those not belonging to any denomination in the US and across Europe. In all European regions and in the United States as well as among all denominations the more devout have more children. However, women in Northern and Western Europe who are the least religious have equivalent or even higher fertility than women in the US, and notably higher fertility than those in Southern Europe. This suggests that forces other than religion and religiousness are also important in their impact on childbearing. A multivariate analysis demonstrates that relatively “traditional” socio-economic covariates (age, marital status, residence, education, and income) do not substantially change the positive association of religiousness and fertility. Finally, if Europeans were as religious as Americans one might theoretically expect a small fertility increase for Europe as a whole, but considerably more for Western Europe.

Keywords

Religion Religiousness Fertility Comparative analysis United States Europe 

Résumé

Religion, religiosité et fécondité aux Etats-Unis et en Europe. L’objectif de cet article est d’évaluer les rôles de la religion et de la religiosité comme déterminant du taux de fécondité plus élevé aux Etats-Unis qu’en Europe. La religion occupe une place importante dans la vie de la moitie des femmes américaines, tandis qu’elle n’est importante que pour 1 européenne sur 6. Quelque soit l’indicateur utilisé, les américaines sont plus religieuses que les européennes. Les femmes catholiques et protestantes ont une fécondité significativement plus élevée que celles sans affiliation religieuse aux Etats-Unis et en Europe. Dans toutes les régions de l’Europe et aux Etats-Unis, ainsi qu’à travers toutes les pratiques religieuses, les plus croyants ont plus d’enfants. Toutefois, les femmes d’Europe du Nord et de l’Ouest, qui sont les moins religieuses, ont une fécondité équivalente ou supérieure aux femmes américaines, et significativement plus élevée que leurs consœurs d’Europe du Sud. Ce constat suggère que des forces autres que la religion ou la religiosité ont aussi un impact important sur la fécondité. Une analyse multivariée montre que les variables socioéconomiques classiquement considérées (âge, statut marital, lieu de résidence, éducation et revenus) ne changent pas substantiellement l’association positive entre religiosité et fécondité. Au final, si le niveau de religiosité des Européennes était équivalent à celui les Américaines, on pourrait théoriquement attendre une légère augmentation de la fécondité en Europe en général, mais de manière beaucoup plus prononcée en Europe de l’Ouest.

Mots clés

Religion Religiosité Fécondité Analyse comparative Etats-Unis Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The major effort for the whole project is supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to the Population Resource Center. Thanks are further due to the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, for partial financial support for Tomas Frejka. The authors appreciate the many useful comments provided by two anonymous reviewers and by the EJP editor. They also acknowledge the help of Judie Miller and Dawn Koffman of the Office of Population Research, Princeton University for secretarial and computing assistance.

References

  1. Adsera, A. (2004). Marital fertility and religion: Recent changes in Spain. Discussion paper, no. 1399, IZA (Institute for the Study of Labor), Bonn.Google Scholar
  2. Bélanger, A., & Ouellet, G. (2002). A comparative study of recent trends in Canadian and American fertility, 1980–1999. In A. Bélanger (Ed.), Report on the demographic situation in Canada (pp. 107–136), 2001. Statistics Canada, Cat. No. 91-209-XPE. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P. (2005). Statement at roundtable “Secular Europe and religious America: Implications for transatlantic relations”. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, April 21, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  4. Billings, J. S. (1889). Vital statistics of the Jews in the United States. Census Bulletin, 19, 4–9.Google Scholar
  5. Caldwell, J., & Schindlmayr, T. (2003). Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities. Population Studies, 57(3), 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coale, A. J., & Zelnick, M. (1963). New estimates of fertility and population in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. DellaPergola, S. (1980). Patterns of American Jewish fertility. Demography, 17(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frejka, T. (2004). The ‘curiously high’ fertility of the USA. Population Studies, 58(1), 88–92.Google Scholar
  9. Frejka, T., & Sardon, J.-P. (2004). Childbearing trends and prospects in low-fertility countries: A cohort analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Goldscheider, C. (1967). Fertility of the Jews. Demography, 4(1), 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernization, and social structure. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Goldscheider, C. (1999). Religious values, dependencies, and fertility: Evidence and implications from Israel. In R. Leete (Ed.), Dynamics of values in fertility change (pp. 310–330). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goldscheider, C. (2006). Religion, family, and fertility: What do we know historically and comparatively? In R. Derosas & F. van Poppel (Eds.), Religion and the decline of fertility in the western world (pp. 41–57). Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Goldscheider, C., & Mosher, W. D. (1991). Patterns of contraceptive use in the United States: The importance of religious beliefs. Studies in Family Planning, 22, 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein, J. R., Lutz, W., & Testa M.-R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement fertility ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review Policy Review, 22(5–6), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greeley, A. M. (2002). Religion in Europe at the end of the second millenium: A sociological profile. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Greeley, A. M. (2004). Religious decline in Europe? America. The National Catholic Weekly, 190(1), 16–19.Google Scholar
  18. Hobcraft, J., & Kiernan, K. (1995). Becoming a parent in Europe. Evolution or revolution in European population. In Proceedings of the European population conference, Milano.Google Scholar
  19. Iannaccone, L. R. (1998). Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(3), 1465–1495.Google Scholar
  20. Iannaccone, L. R. (1991). The Consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society, 3(2), 156–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iannaccone, L. R., Finke, R., & Stark, R. (1997). Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state. Economic Inquiry 35(2), 350–364.Google Scholar
  22. Iannaccone, L. R., Stark, R., & Finke, R. (1998). Rationality and the ‘religious mind’. Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Immerman, R. S., & Mackey, W. C. (2003). Religion and fertility. The Mankind Quarterly, XLIII(4), 377–405.Google Scholar
  24. John Paul, II (2003). Ecclesia in Europa (The Church in Europe). Published in L’Osservatore Romano (English weekly edition), July 2Google Scholar
  25. Hart, D. B. (2004). Religion in America: Ancient and modern. New Criterion, March, 5–18.Google Scholar
  26. Kertzer, D. (2006). Religion and the decline of fertility: Conclusions. In R. Derosas & F. van Poppel (Eds.), Religion and the decline of fertility in the western world (pp. 259–269). Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lesthaeghe, R., & Moors, G. (2000). Recent trends in fertility and household formation in the industrialized west. Review of Population and Social Policy, 9, 121–170.Google Scholar
  28. Macura, M., & MacDonald, A. L. (2003). Fertility and fertility regulation in Eastern Europe: From the socialist to the post-socialist era. In I. Kotowska & Jóźwiak (Eds.), Population of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw: Challenges and Opportunities.Google Scholar
  29. McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mead, W. R. (2005). Statement at roundtable “Secular Europe and religious America: Implications for transatlantic relations. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, April 21, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40(4), 589-603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B., & Johnson, D. P. (1992). Religion and fertility in the United States: New patterns. Demography, 29(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Observatoire Démographique Européen. (2006). Personal communications.Google Scholar
  35. Pew Research Center. (2002). Among wealthy Nations U.S. stands alone in its embrace of religion (http://people-press.org/).Google Scholar
  36. Pew Research Center. (2003). Anti-Americanism: Causes and characteristics. (http://people-press.org/).Google Scholar
  37. Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2004). American religious landscapes and political attitudes. http://pewforum.org/docs/index.php?DocID=55Google Scholar
  38. Sardon, J.-P. (2004). Recent demographic trends in the developed countries. Population, 59(2), 263–314 (English edition).Google Scholar
  39. Sobotka, T., & Adigüzel, F. (2003). Religiosity and spatial demographic differences in the Netherlands. SOM Research Report 02F65, University of Groningen (www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/som/f/02F65/02F65.pdf).Google Scholar
  40. Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and the second demographic transition (STD) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3, Article 3 (www.demographic-research.org).Google Scholar
  41. van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–57.Google Scholar
  42. Warner, R. S. (1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1044–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weigel, G., (2005). The Cube and the Cathedral: Europe, America, and politics without God. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Westoff, C. F., & Bumpass, L. (1973). The revolution in birth control practices of U.S. Roman Catholics. Science, 179, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Westoff, C. F., & Jones, E. F. (1979). The end of ‘Catholic’ fertility. Demography, 16(2), 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Westoff, C. F., & Ryder, N. B. (1977). The contraceptive revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wetrogan, S. (2003). Overview. In U.S. Census Bureau conference: The direction of fertility in the United States (pp. 1–2). Washington, DC: Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics (COPAFS).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ConsultantSanibelUSA
  2. 2.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations